Modulus-86 build thread

Sorry for the disturbance... It works now! the fuses were too fast. I have replaced them with 1.6 A slow fuses, and I can read the right voltages on pin 4 and 7 of U4. Great!

Dominique


Dominique,
Thanks for this post.
Glad I found this, I just powered up the amplifier only to blow the 1a fuse immediately, twice in a row, UK mains 230/240v. I have some 1.6A fuses coming now.
 
T and slow blow are basically the same.
They survive longer when an overload is applied.
T = time delay/ed

T1A, or ordinary 1A, will allow ~240VA of continuous power into the transformer.
T1A will not allow a 240VA transformer (or motor) to start up reliably. You would need to fit a soft start to get reliable repeated start up behaviour.

I have found that limiting the start up Primary current to 2Aac (2.8Apk) allows a T1A to give reliable start ups.
You could extend this experiment to see how much current can pass and NOT blow a T1A fuse during repeated start ups.
It would be nice to have data for a series of T fuses. The manufacturers do not give this in the datasheets.

For 240Vac and 2Aac you would need ~120r of limiting resistance. i.e. I use 100r to 110r of added resistance for a T1A fuse.
 
Last edited:
But you must play a good record, with high DR (dynamic range). FLAC or similar. Orchestral mass if it is possible, please.

-> Album list - Dynamic Range Database

Something like this:
foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1
log date: 2015-04-02 19:24:26

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: Ries, Ferdinand / Symphonien Nr. 7 & 8 (Griffiths, Zürcher Kammerorchester)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR Peak RMS Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR15 -0.68 dB -21.94 dB 10:50 01-Symphonie Nr. 7 a-moll op. 181 - Allegro con spirito
DR15 -5.91 dB -28.49 dB 8:22 02-Symphonie Nr. 7 a-moll op. 181 - Larghetto con moto
DR13 -3.35 dB -23.43 dB 5:08 03-Symphonie Nr. 7 a-moll op. 181 - Scherzo. Allegro non troppo
DR13 -4.65 dB -22.78 dB 9:57 04-Symphonie Nr. 7 a-moll op. 181 - Finale: Largo - Allegro vivace
DR14 -3.91 dB -23.29 dB 13:23 05-Symphonie [Nr. 8] Es-dur WoO 30 - Adagio con moto
DR14 -7.01 dB -29.07 dB 4:41 06-Symphonie [Nr. 8] Es-dur WoO 30 - Andante con moto
DR15 -2.62 dB -25.13 dB 4:20 07-Symphonie [Nr. 8] Es-dur WoO 30 - Scherzo: Vivace
DR14 -4.27 dB -23.56 dB 10:35 08-Symphonie [Nr. 8] Es-dur WoO 30 - Finale: Allegro
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of tracks: 8
Official DR value: DR14

Samplerate: 88200 Hz
Channels: 2
Bits per sample: 24
Bitrate: 2284 kbps
Codec: FLAC
=======================================

Dynamic Range Meter - foobar2000

ComponentFree Downloads | DYNAMIC RANGE | pleasurize music!
 
Last edited:
Neurochrome.com
Joined 2009
Paid Member
But you must play a good record, with high DR (dynamic range). FLAC or similar. Orchestral mass if it is possible, please.

Actually, I think he must fix the blown fuse first... No fuse. No sound.

A 1.6 or 2.0 A slow-blow fuse should work. The inrush current will depend on the exact transformer and supply caps chosen, hence, the fuse needs to be selected for each individual case. I generally find that Ifuse = VA/Vmains, where VA is the VA rating of the transformer is a reasonable starting point. Remember, the fuse is there to protect your house from burning down. The fuse is not intended to protect any circuitry.

For smaller transformers, say <=200 VA, a soft start is usually not needed as the transformer has enough internal resistance to limit the current to a reasonable value. Larger transformers, could benefit from a soft start circuit ... or a larger fuse. Either approach is valid.

~Tom
 
DC servo

One question,

Does the use of a DC servo offer better sound than a well implemented DC?

After listening for an hour and switching from servo to non servo and back for at least 100 times, I can say that I couldn't detect any difference in sound between the two situations. So if there is any difference in sound between a servo and not servo circuit it should be under the distortions introduced by an expensive polyprop capacitor. I'm a bit shocked by the results considering how radical opinions were expressed related to this subject...

So my final conclusion is that there is no audible differece between gain blocks with DC servo and no DC servo. Also I think that direct, capacitorless coupling (with DC servo circuit) has the cleanest audio because there are no artifacts induced by the DC servo circuit and there is the advantage of eliminating a coupling cap.

I sugest anyone who can do this test in controlled condition to do it to confirm my foundings.

chrissugar
 
Last edited:
Also keep in mind that fuses are odd devices. There are applications where a standard-blow or fast-blow will take longer to blow than a slow-blow. As Tom points out, the fuse is there for safety. You don't want a 50 amp fuse but you don't need one that just barely survives a turn-on surge.
 
Neurochrome.com
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Does the use of a DC servo offer better sound than a well implemented DC?

Using a DC servo allows you to eliminate DC blocking capacitors in the signal path, which many find desirable.

A well-designed DC servo has no impact on the sound quality. A well-chosen DC blocking capacitor has no impact on the sound quality either. Key word here: well-chosen, well-designed - i.e. apply engineering, do the math, take the measurements.

Rather than asking "does this impact the sound", I suggest reading up on the purpose of the various circuit blocks. Bob Cordell's book, "Designing Power Amplifiers" is a worthwhile read. As is Douglas Self's "Small Signal Audio Design", actually. I'd recommend it over his power amp book.

~Tom
 
277 VA per channel is needed if you want to reproduce a sine wave at the highest possible output voltage swing. You may find that excessive, but physics and math don't lie...
If dual bridge rectifier and 5x3300uF per rail, 150VA~250VA per channel, or
If single bridge rectifier and 22,000uF per rail, 250VA~300VA per channel.
Notably, the center-point of that latter figure is 275VA.
Yeah, quite close to 277VA.

For a stereo Modulous86, a 22+22vac 500VA transformer seems adequate, since the capacitive load wasn't doubled--it is still pushing 22,000uF per rail.

On the board, I think that I see some power filter at the LME, and since those are individualized per right and left channels, crosstalk distortion is gone, so the stereo amp may have the same stereo separation as dual-mono. Right?
 
I found it interesting to notice my woofers fluttering around 5Hz when one section of a record rotated under the stylus. The music played loud and clear while the 5Hz came and went on each rotation. The DC servo did not affect music playback at all, even allowing a 5Hz signal to pass. I couldn't hear any difference in SQ with or without the 5Hz flutter. I was surprised to see such a LF signal get past the DC servo, but it did.
Rich
 
Actually, I think he must fix the blown fuse first... No fuse. No sound.

A 1.6 or 2.0 A slow-blow fuse should work. The inrush current will depend on the exact transformer and supply caps chosen, hence, the fuse needs to be selected for each individual case. I generally find that Ifuse = VA/Vmains, where VA is the VA rating of the transformer is a reasonable starting point. Remember, the fuse is there to protect your house from burning down. The fuse is not intended to protect any circuitry.

For smaller transformers, say <=200 VA, a soft start is usually not needed as the transformer has enough internal resistance to limit the current to a reasonable value. Larger transformers, could benefit from a soft start circuit ... or a larger fuse. Either approach is valid.

~Tom

Thanks Tom,
So right on the edge at 225 VA then.
I will get some 2A fuses too.
It might be nice to have but I really don't think a soft start is needed with a little amplifier like this having use numerous much larger amplifiers. This is a dwarf transformer compared to those in many high power Audiophile monstrosities.
 
Member
Joined 2014
Paid Member
I found it interesting to notice my woofers fluttering around 5Hz when one section of a record rotated under the stylus. The music played loud and clear while the 5Hz came and went on each rotation. The DC servo did not affect music playback at all, even allowing a 5Hz signal to pass. I couldn't hear any difference in SQ with or without the 5Hz flutter. I was surprised to see such a LF signal get past the DC servo, but it did.
Rich

5Hz !=DC. I can't recall the frequency of Tom's servo but likely to be around 0.1Hz
 
Also keep in mind that fuses are odd devices. There are applications where a standard-blow or fast-blow will take longer to blow than a slow-blow. As Tom points out, the fuse is there for safety. You don't want a 50 amp fuse but you don't need one that just barely survives a turn-on surge.

Hi BrianL,
Yes, perhaps a 2.5A will be required, to avoid random fuse deaths.
First job is to get it going, check the circuit is working happily. I will have to investigate for further potential causes if the 1.6A fuses blow immediately.
 
Member
Joined 2014
Paid Member
But you must play a good record, with high DR (dynamic range). FLAC or similar. Orchestral mass if it is possible, please.

http://www.pleasurizemusic.com/es/free-downloads

A higher dynamic range does not automatically mean a better recording. I have some orchestral recordings with the same DR from that plugin as the new Led Zep remasters. Which is a better test record is up to the person listening as its a personal experience. As time goes on I trust that plugin less and less