I went through the room issues. Hapeems even with speakers pulled out into the room and setup in a very balanced way and me in the nearfeild. I matched all components methodically. It basically amounts to a perceived increase in output from the higher mF channel. Subtle but there. I even went to the trouble of switching PSU boards with main boards and still noticed it. I didnt mention it to create an OT, just to reiterate the point that there are many different variables in building an amp. THe F6 has shown us this. If you are building a "final case", I believe you should be thinking dual mono.
Two other options to full dual mono:I went through the room issues. Hapeems even with speakers pulled out into the room and setup in a very balanced way and me in the nearfeild. I matched all components methodically. It basically amounts to a perceived increase in output from the higher mF channel. Subtle but there. I even went to the trouble of switching PSU boards with main boards and still noticed it. I didnt mention it to create an OT, just to reiterate the point that there are many different variables in building an amp. THe F6 has shown us this. If you are building a "final case", I believe you should be thinking dual mono.
- Transformer with 4 secondary windings, 2 for each channel.
- Nelson's CRRCC hack, where 2 secondary windings supply the first cap banks, and each amplifier is fed from its own RC filter banks beyond that.
I think it is a splurge to some degree, but seems to be the widely held opinion of many, whatever thats worth. I will more than likely have 2 or 3 "final" amps. They will be dual mono.
You need to take your meds.😀
How is my fair lady coming along. Babydiya has to be marching with pitchforks by now.
How is my fair lady coming along. Babydiya has to be marching with pitchforks by now.
Last edited:
ook ya , I'm all meds , all the time
fell in da Kettle as a kidoe , same as Obelix
going 'morrow to Sea , for two weeks
fell in da Kettle as a kidoe , same as Obelix

going 'morrow to Sea , for two weeks
Enjoy. Make sure you wear your floaties and tie off.
Attachments
Last edited:
Which Sea? Did you know that SPF30 gives 97% protection and is fully adequate Any higher SPF values give an added 1-2% improvements and were deemed a waste of money. And one may have to use a full container [ not a tablespoon] of SPF30 during a day in the sun to get protection. Have a great time.ook ya , I'm all meds , all the time
fell in da Kettle as a kidoe , same as Obelix
going 'morrow to Sea , for two weeks
fell in da Kettle as a kidoe , same as Obelix
Pal, you fell in the sausage barrel.
Enjoy your holiday with the 2 other unshaven ones.
Make sure you wear your floaties
Now that's what I'd call a big red rubber.
(drowning dick phobia ?)
Last edited:
Here is a simplified version, with or without cascoding.
Attachments
Last edited:
Have I diverged too far from the original F6 design for this to be considered?Here is a simplified version, with or without cascoding.
If you are using reversed complementary fets on the minus side there is no actual need for the transformer.
You are re-reversing it
To be more in the spirir of F6 (same device symmetry etc) I would use the same cascode up and down and just connect rhe down part to the other transformer side
However the transformer feels a bit redundant if we use both complementary parts. It becomes more of a flavour than a practical element.
You are re-reversing it
To be more in the spirir of F6 (same device symmetry etc) I would use the same cascode up and down and just connect rhe down part to the other transformer side
However the transformer feels a bit redundant if we use both complementary parts. It becomes more of a flavour than a practical element.
Huh?
THe Jfet FE of BA3 FE is a unity gain phase splitter, sorta like a transformer. Well, if you split into two, that is what you have. Just ramblings of idle mind. I like The F6CC if it can retain the nature of F6 and improve performance.
Last edited:
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- F6 Amplifier