Naim Nait 5i Bypass issue

Hi everyone,

I'm currently facing an issue with my (beloved) Naim Nait 5i from 2005.
When in Bypass mode I have noises coming up on the speakers.

My setup:
  • Naim Nait 5i amp
  • Audio-GD 3.32 Dac
  • HT Preamp Emotiva UMC-200
  • Computer is connected using optical fibre to the Emotiva, and coaxial to the DAC
  • Synology NAS connected to DAC with USB
When using the Naim 5i as in integrated with the NAS or PC, no issues.
When in A/V mode through the HT pream (optical f and unity gain) I'm picking all noises from the PC, hard disks, mouse movements..

So far I've tried different things:
  • Changed the PC power supply to a gold X-650 Seasonic
  • Plug the Naim 5m away from the PC
  • Add some ferrite cores on the PC and amplifier power supply lines
What worries me is that those noises are there even with A/V inputs unplugged from the amplifier so it all comes through power lines. Unity gain is amplifying all defects from the power lines..

While looking for a solution I realized that I had quite some "Humming" in A/V mode with no inputs plugged. (Ground loop ..?)

And while checking I also noticed a strong odour around the power supply capacitors in the amp. Could they be dead? No bulging on these BHC 10000uF and 4700uF

MANY thanks for any help or insight.. !!

WTB Or Trade

Hi,

Looking for the 6DJ8s that HP used in their equipment.
These are the ECC88 or E88CC, I forget which.

I've got this annoying ARC SP10 pre amp that is very
difficult to find quiet tubes in the phone section and parts
of the preamp section. Hence the need for the extremely quiet types.

If you have some and know they are quiet, please let me know
as I need them. I can trade for the Mazda 6V6 tube or Philips 7581As

Cheers,

Threshold SL10 is this cap backwards?

Hello,
Recently acquired this gorgeous Threshold SL10 but it sounds flat and clinical in comparison to my Pass korg B1. Like very flat.

So I had a peak and someone has been here before me. No surprise on an amp this old. Caps need to get replaced so they were. High quality black gate and Panasonic caps used by the looks of it.
But I noticed one cap in an unusual orientation and dining a simple image comparison shows maybe just maybe one of these 47uf 50V caps is backwards.
Am I loosing my mind?

Context:
Both are driving Hypex ncore Nc400s with Klipsch Forte 3 at the helm.
Turntable is micro seiki DD40 with nagaoka MP-150.

I really thought the Threshold SL10 was going to hand it to the Pass Korg B1 but maybe I’m just super wrong.

Would love your thoughts.
Thanks and stay safe.
Jules

Attachments

  • FA472EC3-BB54-4FAE-B200-949964B40CB0.jpeg
    FA472EC3-BB54-4FAE-B200-949964B40CB0.jpeg
    357.5 KB · Views: 93
  • 8C69418A-B695-400D-BE3F-66B0A716A634.jpeg
    8C69418A-B695-400D-BE3F-66B0A716A634.jpeg
    329 KB · Views: 95
  • 6F6CDB6E-A6B2-4770-8779-1485D6374AB4.jpeg
    6F6CDB6E-A6B2-4770-8779-1485D6374AB4.jpeg
    354 KB · Views: 92
  • F6017449-D340-4603-B4EB-6268553994E6.jpeg
    F6017449-D340-4603-B4EB-6268553994E6.jpeg
    349.9 KB · Views: 86

FS a few of the most fun builds I have done

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.




These were some of the most fun builds I have done. The AO35 hammond and the B&H speaker boxes are like a blank canvas every build. The amps can be tweaked a zillion ways and you can see how creative you can be with the cabinets. If you look at the brown one you can see the patch cord reel. How awesome is that. It was of course some dry rotted speaker cable that had to be rewound with Mogami gold. I also had to put metal bottoms on the amps for shielding. These are almost dead silent but easily over driven. The brown one is also sporting a modified Newcomb TR-16. My son has been playing and collecting for 30 years and I have done tons of work on his many amps. He auditions each of these for me and every single time he is just amazed at the performance out of these compact units. No two of these ever sound the same...component, layout, tube brand and array give each amp subtle but noticeable nuances. Like I said...these are like a blank canvas and I thoroughly enjoy these builds. I know what they cost to build and 95% of the tubes are vintage but I really don't know what to ask for them. These are one off's and you will not see any others like these. Hydro dipping was expensive and they generally take about 4 - 6 hours total build time. My sons friends have all tried them out and a retired marine friend of mine played a couple local gigs a few months ago with the stars and stripes unit. I have since been inundated with requests for custom logos and configurations for different applications. Any help on pricing these units would be greatly appreciated. BTW...this site has been an immeasurable support group for tips and tricks. Thanks to all the craftsmen...one of which I am not.

500/1 LP filter does not work

My tale of woe:


About 15 years ago I purchased this 500/1 new. Installed it, worked great. That car got totaled and the amp removed about 8 years ago, and the amp has been in a drawer ever since.

I recently decided to install this amp and the 12w6v3-D4 in another vehicle. Hooked it up, no lights of any kind. Found a recommendation to toggle the signal sense switch 5-10 times. Did that, and yay it powers up. No sound though. I turned the LP filter from 12db to Off, and now it plays, but it sounds funny. Not just full range funny, not really distorted, just...not right.

I take the amp to my local car audio place, they have a repair section. The guy acts like I'm a total idiot, has this smirk on his face. Whatever. I explain that the LP filter won't work, and thus the related dials. (Bass Boost, Q, etc) don't work.

He plugs it in to his bench test setup, and, of course, the damn thing won't power on. I leave it in his tender care, he says repair will run $150-$300 if its totally smoked. Fine.

I pick it up, he charges me $160. Apparently he didn't find any failed components but did find a bunch of bad solder joints on the preamp board, gain dial, etc. I hook it up, and guess what. THE DAMN LP FILTER IS STILL INOP.

The sub now plays full range just fine, sounds good, no distortion, as long as LP filter is set to "Off". My current headunit does not have a filter I can turn on, its a junker. I'm planning on replacing it with one that has dedicated sub outs and a built in filter, so maybe its not worth messing around with the amp anymore, but I would like the damn thing to work fully.

After doing a bunch of searching here I pulled off the back cover and lifted the preamp board and pushed it back down 10 times, based on posts here that usually fixes it. It did make a kinda scratching noise the first few times which smoothed out. I put the cover back on and reinstalled it, no change. LP filter on 12db or 24db causes all output to stop. I also rotated the frequency dial fully about 10 times.

I'm already $160 into this thing, and used ones are running $200-$250 on ebay. I'm fully willing to buy a couple and return them until I get one that works. I'm leery of putting any more money in this unit, especially at a repair shop where they didn't bench test the amp for the concern I brought it in for.


So, does anyone have any advice for fixing this myself? Should I just get the better headunit and forget about repairing the amp, as it does work? If I go that route, is it okay to run the sub full range for a while, or could that cause damage? I don't have the gain very loud at all.

I'm hoping Perry Babin might have some input.

Caps 3 PC system replaced with a Hi Quality DIY Renderer

I have been using a CA caps variant PC based music system for some years. IT has a async USB card and SSD fitted with LPS for 12v and 5v components.
A year ago I returned to vinyl, heavily rebuilding a technics 1200 and building a DCT phono pre. This excercise highlighted the shortfall with my digital system- a tiring sound with a lack of fine detail highlighted in piano and violin pieces.
At the time I was working on my vinyl a friend told me of a company in Switzerland who made digital audio boards for the OEM market and sold some with an evaluation board to the DIY market -a bit like Hypex in their early days.
Two months ago he sent me his DIY board for evaluation
I was hooked at first listen, using 24/96 files from Linn library I heard crystal clear piano violins, A bit gobsmacked this unit was producing the closest Ive heard to dear old analogue from any digital equipment ive had connected to my system.
I bought one and built it.
All the family young and old ears consider this is the best so far.
Ive now built my second unit so both my systems are on the new Renderers - CAPS SB touch etc all redundant.
I have mentioned this on the CA forum but there may be more interest here in the DIY project.
The company - engineered SA - electronic, engineering and consulting
The board, which includes the Mr-Mod module, their NMR board
Cost circa 420 Swiss Francs -total cost to me with carriage and EU duty into the UK was £ 340
IT needs an ethernet network in and outputs SPDIF ( I2S is available)
a power supply at 3.3v 450 ma-750 ma
a mini 75ohm SMG coax plug with RG179 cable between board and case outlet
a case
I run it from Jriver on my NAS a with J remote on an old ipad and ipod.
Ill try and post a photo but Ive had 3 attempts so far and all I get is locked out and have to retype this, so its my last go.
If i fail ask me for any more info on the build if needed.
The final case to match my Benchmarks
zkpYnH7.jpg

The inards, PSU on the RHS REg and NMR board on the left
jDN5UZc.jpg

FS: AES Acoustic Elegance TDH12-4 12" Subwoofers - new

I have a pair of new, used, never hooked up TD12H -4ohm. The "H" version is the best for sub use and for smaller enclosures. Fs = 26

$245 each + shipping. Shipping for one should be around $31 and $51 for both. Free pickup for cash in Denver area.

These will come in the original carton with all packaging materials.

These are great-looking speakers. Would work great as subs or in a 3-way design.

Acoustic Elegance TD12H - Sealed or Vented Box Applications

The TD Series woofers are low distortion, high Xmax, wide bandwidth, bass drivers designed for sealed or vented enclosure applications. The TD12H uses a 4 layer flat wire copper coil. They have the highest BL and also highest mass. This allows them to work in smaller vented enclosures and have better low end extension. They make the best pure subwoofer drivers in the series.

TD12H Highlights:
Lambda Motor with Full Copper Faraday Sleeve (FCFS) (Apollo Option available)
Extremely low and linear inductance
Wide bandwidth and detailed midbass
High Xmax with clean suspension travel
High Efficiency upper/midbass
Designed for sealed or vented box applications
Also ideal for SQ Automotive subwoofers
The TD Series woofers are low distortion, high Xmax, wide bandwidth, bass drivers designed for sealed or vented enclosure applications. They work well in a variety of applications including subwoofers, bass/midbass drivers in 2way or 3way systems, and automotive SQ subwoofer applications. The Lambda Motor means they have very low/linear inductance with response extending cleanly to over 1000hz. The high Xmax allows them to play the lowest notes with accuracy and authority. TD woofers have been used in high end recording monitors, home theater subwoofers, and extremely high end hi-fi systems retailing for upwards of $100,000. When you want the most accurate woofer for sealed box applications, look no further than the TD Series.

So why do you have several versions? What do the different letters, M, S, X, and H mean?

The TD Series woofers come in 4 different varieties allowing for a variety of uses.
The TDM woofers are designed specifically for midbass/midrange use. They have higher efficiency and extremely clean upper end extension, playing cleanly to over 2KHz on axis. The Xmax is lower, 6mm, which is a trade off necessary to achieve the high efficiency.
The TD S, X, and H are all similar and can be used in bass/midbass applications. The core parts (cone, surround, spider, motor, and frame) are the same among all models. The only difference between the models is the wire used to wind the voice coils. All extend cleanly to over 1KHz.
The TDS use a 2 layer round wire copper coil for higher Qts. They are typically the option chosen for sealed box applications and larger vented box applications. They are often used in larger floor standing speakers.
The TDX uses a 4 layer flat wire aluminum coil. The BL is slightly higher and mass is slightly lower. They are typically used in vented enclosures where more efficiency is desired.
The TDH uses a 4 layer flat wire copper coil. They have the highest BL and also highest mass. This allows them to work in smaller vented enclosures and have better low end extension. They make the best pure subwoofer drivers in the series.

TD12H-4ohm
Fs: 26.7Hz
Qms: 3.72
Vas: 160 L
Cms: .4 mm/N
Mms: 88.6 g
Rms: 4 kg/S
Xmax: 14 mm(peak)
Xmech: 18 mm(peak)
Sd: 530 sqcm
Vd: 1.48L (p-p)
Qes: .25
Re: 3.5 ohm
Le: .3 mH
Z: 4 ohm
Bl: 14.4 T/m
Pe: 500W (cont.)
Qts: .23
1WSPL: 92.9 dB
2.83V: 96.46 dB

6aypjfT.jpg

rPDtu8X.jpg

JENc5kt.jpg

kwZVgUk.jpg

lpbSLZV.jpg

QwDHHrI.jpg

cross point suggestion

Hello,
i am looking for suggestions about crossover frequencies for my already good speakers. The drivers are seas excel W26fx001, w15ch001 and t29cf002 tweeter. Now i have them crossed at 180hz and 1980hz all LR 48db/oct and i am very happy. These days and because of the covid-19 virus i thought to play a little with the cross frequencies. The crossover is implemented using SHARC processor (IIR for the filters and FIR for driver EQ and phase correction)so any change is quite easy to implement. What do you suggest that i should try to change? Maybe going the high cross even lower? or the low cross higher? The high cross can't go higher because the 3rd harmonic of the midrange driver so it can only go lower - i think the tweeter can go lower for example at 1500Hz -48db/oct, can't it?

Help with 2 way crossover design

Hello! I am planning on building a speaker but the problem is that I have Little to no knowlage when it comes crossover design / building. I was wondering if I could get some help with picking out parts for a crossover. I was planning on using the Aurum Cantus AC-165 6-1/2" Carbon Fiber/Kevlar Woofer with the Tang Band 25-2234SE 1" tweeter. I would want a pretty bass Heavy sound almost lime the Kef ls50’s but also a good high-end sound like the Bowers & Wilkings 800’s. Could I please get some help?

Sony mds jb940

i have a mds jb940 that i have been working on,i have cured all its issues but one still remains, one of the optical inputs dosent work on the jb940 it has on the back, 1 optical output,
the analogue in and out's 1 coaxial output, 1 coaxial input and two optical inputs, optical input no2 dosent work, cant understand why,
i have service manual and followed it back, on pin 1 it should have 3.3v it has about 0.25v, on that line there are only 2 caps before it is linked
to optical input no1 which works, i have replaced c306, no change, if i remember right the other is surface mount which is possibly beyond my
soldering capabilities, pin 2 is the ground pin which is seperated from pin 1 in circuit by the same caps, that circuit serves all the jacks and ends up at a transistor and switch, then pin 3 looks like a signal pin
that goes through some components to the ic, the other optical jacks go to the same ic.
anyway logic says if the power is not getting to no2 and its getting to no1 then it can either only be 1 of the 2 caps or somehow its not switching on.
there is a button on front panel that switches through all inputs, when it gets to no2 it says c71 no signal.
i know it sounds like a bit of a jumbled up story, but if anybody can give me a pointer it would be appreciated.

Four UCD400

My current amp is:
2xUCD400;
+-50V dual linear PSU;
4x4700mkF per rail;
~500W toroid / quad secondaries;
balanced inputs;
input buffer's gain is reduced to ~18db;
PSU voltage drops to ~+-42V @ 4 Oms with 4V RMS input signal (max volume).

I'm planning to add two more UCD400s into this setup for the bi-amping.

1 there won't be any of the crossovers. Is there anything special I should implement for connecting input signals? Just to do the parallel or to add resistors in series?

2 the extra UCD will be loaded by 2 Oms speaker. Hereafter, I'm planning to add an extra filtering capacitors like 2x3300mkF per rail to the new module. Is this OK? Also, I worry that the transformer won't be powerful enough. Would you recommend to upgrade it to more powerful?

Thanks

Opa2134 Stability Dependent on Supply Voltage?

I have an individual trying to tell me that an Opa2134 will oscillate of used on 12V rails. I can't for the life of me fathom how one could come to such an arbitrary conclusion, and the circuit in question is about as basic as it gets (the first gainstage in a car amp). There are appropriate decoupling capacitors in place as well.

Is there any basis for this? I installed it and scoped the outputs of the opamp and there's no oscillation. I scoped the output of the amp and there's no oscillation. Idle current from my bench supply is super low (80mA from a 12V bench supply), but this individual is convinced that I'm missing the big picture.

Suggestions for next project

Hi guys!

I need your opinions for my next project.

What I have:
A 28 Sq. Meter living room
A class d pioneer LX58 home cinema amp
Morel solus speakers (the main speakers are 3way columns with 2x6.5 mid and midbass)
An 8inch active subwoofer

The problem:
I feel that I need smaller speakers. I really like the morels but most of the time I listen to my music at lower volumes and losing lots of detail, also I am watching movies mostly at night. Of course I've tried all the loudness etc. from the receiver but again, I feel I am losing the details.

What I have in mind:
I don't have enough experience to design my own speakers, so I have to build someone's project.
I feel that a 2way with a 5inch midbass will do the job.
I am looking at troels gravensen designs, especially at seas curv with seas drivers but also I am tempted at many sb acoustics projects but the majority are with sb17 or satori 6inch drivers.
A subwoofer is already installed so bass extension is not a problem.

My question:
Going from a 2x6.5 inch columns setup to a single 5inch/6inch will do the job when it comes to listening to lower volumes?

Do you have any suggestions on 5/6inch projects? I want to keep the budget low, so mostly seas prestige or sb acoustics.

FS: First Watt F6 boards and SMSL M8A dac

SOLDLightly used SMSL M8A DAC, original owner with all parts.SOLD

SOLDFirst Watt F6 boards assembled with matched set of Toshiba 2SK170/2SJ74 parts purchased from "Alweit" on Ebay. SOLD

Both the M8A and F6 boards are in working order.

M8A- 110usd

F6 boards- 110usd

The above prices include shipping in the USA. For sales to other countries, I will need to compute the shipping.
Payment via Paypal gift. I am a long time Ebayer under "drpro" with 100% feedback.

Questions, please PM or call 6154298373
Tnx for looking.
David

Attachments

  • SMSL-1.jpg
    SMSL-1.jpg
    289.4 KB · Views: 173
  • SMSL-2.jpg
    SMSL-2.jpg
    804.9 KB · Views: 166
  • SMSL-3.jpg
    SMSL-3.jpg
    725.3 KB · Views: 166
  • SMSL-4.jpg
    SMSL-4.jpg
    444.2 KB · Views: 162
  • F6-1.jpg
    F6-1.jpg
    321.8 KB · Views: 163
  • F6-22.jpg
    F6-22.jpg
    775 KB · Views: 105
  • F6-33.jpg
    F6-33.jpg
    970.5 KB · Views: 81
  • F6-44.jpg
    F6-44.jpg
    760.6 KB · Views: 75

KEF Daline B110 info needed

Hello fellow enthusiast.
More than 30 years ago I built a Daline transmission line speaker using the following drivers , KEF B110 woofer , KEF T15 mid and a COLES 4001g tweeter. A relative of mine was using it for the last 15 years or so and I have since gotten them back. I find the sound to be dark and not resolute and was thinking of trying some new capacitors in this 3-way crossover. I am not sure if any of these are electrolytics at all and was wondering if any one here can give me some information. The caps all seem to be from the same manufacturer (Erie ?).
Also if anyone can provide me with the construction details of the enclosures including dimensions
Thanks!

Attachments

  • 034.jpg
    034.jpg
    585.4 KB · Views: 470
  • 035.jpg
    035.jpg
    758.2 KB · Views: 457

HDMI->SPDIF extractor + WM8804 = Bad news?

I'm trying to use a Pi + a WM8804 addon board (Hifiberry Digi+ I/O) to do some realtime DSP. TOSLINK in, processing, TOSLINK straight back out again on the same clock. With the clean TOSLINK signal from my desktop motherboard, this works perfectly.

I bought a generic "HDMI->Optical" extractor device, hoping to be able to hook up my contraption to various devices that don't have SPDIF out. The TOSLINK signal from this device works fine when I feed it straight to my DAC, and it works mostly-fine when I feed it to a CM6206-based USB capture device.

But my WM8804 setup hates it. The signal errors out at least once a second, causing constant crackling which obviously isn't acceptable. Cables are known-good; tried multiple HDMI source devices.

I have the chip's "with flags" mode enabled (where various flags are appended to the audio sample itself) and the UNLOCK and/or TRANS_ERR bits are set for the affected samples. This makes me feel fairly safe in assuming the WM8804 itself is losing its grasp on the signal (as opposed to an error between the chip and Pi).

I've been looking through the driver with a fine toothed comb and haven't found anything wrong so far. It's still possible its timing is being set up incorrectly but it looks unlikely at this point (most timing configuration is ignored when the RX is active anyway, according to the datasheet).

The Hifiberry forum's guess was that the jitter/variance from the device was simply too high, perhaps as an inherent result of the audio signal being interleaved with video. However, google shows that the WM8804 has quite a good reputation for being tolerant of jittery signals.

Sadly I don't have an oscilloscope/logic analyser/etc so my ability to investigate much further is limited. Any suggestions would be much appreciated, as would recommendations for particularly tolerant SPDIF rx ICs!

(One obvious thing to do would be to try another extractor device, but aside from being a cheapskate, I'd prefer to be able to receive even questionable signals like this one- it's clearly possible since it works OK with the CM6206 and DAC)

powering two stereo TPA3255 amps using a +/-50Vdc supply

I am thinking about using some cheap TPA3255 amps in an active speaker project. These are readily available from Fleabay (choose carefully!) but come without a power supply. The tricky bit is that a power supply with the right voltage and current capability is not cheap or readily available due to the voltage and current involved.

Being a bit of a hoarder I happen to have some of the ubiquitous dual-output 500W SMPS power supplies lying around that can also be purchased on eBay. I have a pair of these with +/-50V outputs and I am wondering if they could be used to each power a PAIR of the TPA3255 stereo amps. Here is my thinking:

Normally one would need a circa 50Vdc supply for a stereo TPA3255 amp. The PS is single ended, so the inputs are capacitor coupled (reference: the typical application circuit in the datasheet). Could I not connect one of the amps to the +50V supply and PS ground, and connect the other amp between group and the -50V supply? When using the -50V supply, the ground must be connected to the amp's (+) terminal, and the -50V to the (-) terminal.

Assuming this works, I could use the PS with two amps to get 4 channels of amplification on the cheap. As long as I limit the load on any channel to a minimum of 8 Ohms the power demand for two amps should be able to be accommodated by the 500W rated PS. Seems like a very cost effective way to get 4x100W per side.

I just wanted to run this by the forum in case I am setting myself up to let out the magic smoke...

So this showed up on my Facebook page.. Any opinions?

I just had this show up on my facebook page, wondering what you guys think about it?

(No, I'm not affiliated 🙂

MV One – Davis Acoustics

Apparently its using this driver (their own product?) which costs about 785 euros a piece according to Google???

Fullrange speaker Davis Acoustics 20DE8, 8 ohm, 8.7 inch

Seems like a pretty expensive driver to me..?

low cost DSP to improve bass

Optimization of a Subwoofer Line Array with MSO - DSP, Room Correction, and Multi Channel Audio - Audiophile Style
and
Multiple Subwoofers: Optimize Them With Multi-Sub Optimizer Software

These are interesting examples of how low-cost DSP (JRiver on a midrange laptop)plus low-cost / free third party software can massively improve the bass performance of even high-end home cinema installations.

Transformer Polarity.

I think it's about time i learn how to identify transformer leads. I was doing my homework today. It was beginning to make sense until i looked at this thing.
It was a step/ step down/ 1:1 transformer. the 2 black and 2 blue , i believe were the primaries used and combinations for 110 or 220. The two small red leads went to an indicator circuit. That leave one lead for secondary. I know there is none missing. How do i test,and then use it as an isolation transformer?

Attachments

  • hh.jpg
    hh.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 178

Steering Wheel Volume & Station change without ASCW-1?

I'm planning to put a double din head unit in my older Porsche. My plan is to buy an aftermarket steering wheel and put 4 momentary switches in the aluminum webbing of the wheel, for volume up/down and radio station change. I will run these through a clock spring with sufficient terminals, which I've found for my car. I don't want any other features. I've seen a few generic head units on ebay whose description say

"Features 2: Support steering wheel control"

Does that mean there will be wires from the head unit that can be used for this?

I would rather not use a control box such as the ASCW-1.

Here is an example of one of the units ebay head unit with steering wheel control

Dipole attempt SB13PFC + LX5 Lineaum tweeter

I've had those LX5 tweeter in my drawer for 25 years I've always like the liveness they can add to the room. I've decided to use them as surround in a dipole arrangement. SB13PFC Woofer back to back sharing the same enclosure. I build the enclosure and measured the response and ended up with a 10db dip at 430hz one octave wide. It is probably mutual cancellation between the two speakers.
Before i undergo cutting the top to separate the chambers, i am looking for other solutions that would not involving woodworking.
I was thinking of running one woofer like a 2.5way, cross low and skip the BSC on the xover.
Are there solutions, any idea or past experience on similar design from you you can share to remove this dip.
Regards


Bipole Lineaum-1.jpg

DSCN1077.JPG

DSCN1076.JPG

Finally building a sub after a decade - Soundsplinter RL-P15

You will see me post this exact thread on a couple other places, because all the forums have shifted around a bit over the last decade and a half and I want as much useful feedback from a diverse crowd as possible. I've been sitting on a single Soundsplinter RL-P15D4 for about a decade now, biding my time until I finally got all the parts for a build (I got the driver, then a calibrated umik1, a db meter, and then finally for my birthday last month I got a Behringer NX3000D) I've moved in between so what was a theater in a 20x20 room morphed to an upstairs 3 wall theater with a 7.1 setup that was 11x21 to about half that because I had to build a room for my mother to move in (so it is about 11x11 now). As I am short on space, I have to make a coffee table style subwoofer with a front/rear firing (I originally was going to do a sonosub). I've already had all the mdf cut for a box that is 11.3cf (320L) with a 8" port that according to WinISD should be 41.15 inches for a 16hz tune. This will fit in the longest size of the box since the external dimensions are 50.5Lx27W.25x20H. My options for the port are evidently sonotube or sewer pipe, the sewer pipe being some super thick stuff that evidently weighs 8lbs per foot. I do have a Creality CR-10 S5 though with which I can print my own (it has a print area of 20"x20"x20").

My main concerns is the ~8 inches headspace enough for airflow (considering I think I have to add around a half inch for the flare. I have seen an alternative to a regular port, which is the Polk power port design which I've seen a couple builds on but they were all before 3d printing was possible (people had to get them turned on a lathe, or use a router to round the disc, etc). So for the same tune, according to the calcs, the port length only has to be 13.215 inches. Assuming the power port works as intended, the nice thing is I can fairly easily adjust the tuning just by increasing the internal port length (which I can do by printing the tube as a threaded two piece pipe).

Any thoughts or should I just stick with a long tube and call it a day? I'm also looking to try and find a second driver, but these things are over a decade old and finding a somewhat unused one will be hard (have to post in the wanted section and see what happens).

Eventually I'll be moving the whole theater down into the basement, but that will be a whole other project (this used to be my grandparents home). It still has a dirt floor basement but for some reason there is a huge concrete walled area in the corner that has 1'3" foot thick walls that are about 4' high and about 12'x6'. If anyone has ideas for that, let me know! The family story is she hired a Polish guy to make a Russian oven and something got lost in translation...the unfortunate thing is that there is enough concrete from that to have put a floor in the whole basement....

Shango

Sparkler Audio - model S508 "esprit" ― MC Phono Stage Amplifier

Sparkler Audio S508 Phono Stage $1,100.00







Specifications (S508v/S508i)
Power Supply: Worldwide, depend on market (IEC 3 pin AC inlet), AC110~120V, AC220~240V (factory assembled)
Input Terminals: Unbalanced RCA pin jack, frame ground terminal.
Input Impedance: 0Ω - total gain is determined by cartridge internal resistance.
Gain: 60..75dB(@1kHz) - adjustable by gain switch.
Type: MC cartridge, CR network RIAA equalizing, NF de-emphasis, current amplifier.
Line Output (S508v - voltage-mode): Unbalanced RCA pin jack, 2.2Vrms
Line Output (S508i - current-mode): Unbalanced RCA pin jack, 5.5mAp-p
Operations: Power switch, Gain switch (high/low)
Size W260×H46×D160mm - B5 size, Weight 1.46g (without power cable)
Materials: Stainless steel, hairline finished. Stainless top panel with clear acrylic.
Accessories: power cable for IEC 3 pin AC inlet, userʹs manual.

flags_1

Small Dayton PS95-8/DS135-8 Build

Hello

As i have ordered a couple of wifi/bluetooth amplifiers (Arylic Up2Stream Amp 2.0), and wanted to build my own first set of speakers for them.
I found the Dayton PS95-8 and DS135-8 to be the right size(and cheap).
So here is the idea i have come up with:
PS95-8 - full range in upper chamber.
DS135-8 as a low(ish) woofer with a DS135-PR passive radiator in the lower chamber.
The lower chamber has these internal dimensions 15cm/15cm/15cm, and the upper chamber is 15cm/15cm/10cm.
I have uploaded a quick rendering of the idea i have.
DX9s1kX

What kind of crossover(if any) would be needed? or would notch filters be enough?
Here is the curve of the 2 speakers.
PotcMIw


Link to the drivers:
Dayton Audio - PS95-8 3-1/2" Point Source Full-Range Driver 8 Ohm
Dayton Audio - DS135-8 5" Designer Series Woofer Speaker 8 Ohm
Dayton Audio - DS135-PR 5" Designer Series Passive Radiator

Kind regards

Plasterboard/dry wall/hollow wall fixings

Hi,

I am doing a little DIY at home, apologies this isnt really audio related!

I have begun to build a cabin bed for my eldest son, which I plan to hang on the wall. The room is literally the length of a single bed, so the bed will be supported on 3 sides.

On the long edge I have a brick wall, and also at one end, and I have some sturdy looking M10 anchor screws, and something like 7 or 8 anchor points along the bed frame length., and foot end, placed every 8 or 10 inches.

So I am then left with the head end of the bed, which is hollow wall.

I'm looking for some suggestions for plasterboard fixings that I can rely on to take their share of the load.


TIA for any help

Attachments

  • 20200402_172012_copy_1382x1843.jpg
    20200402_172012_copy_1382x1843.jpg
    395.6 KB · Views: 165

Identifying transformer leads

Hi all,
I have this Nad 216 THX toroidal transformer but I have no idea how this thing should be wired. It is 120V/230V.

Measurements:

Black-green 0,7ohm
Black-orange 0,7ohm
Green-Orange 0,8ohm

Black-gray 1,0ohm
Black-brown 1,0ohm
Black-red 2,6ohm
Gray-brown 0,5ohm
Gray-red 2,1ohm
Brown-red 2,0ohm

How to connect 230v?

Attachments

  • 451AFEC8-EB64-4405-B31C-8EFB94D03713.jpg
    451AFEC8-EB64-4405-B31C-8EFB94D03713.jpg
    924.1 KB · Views: 129

EL34 Internal shorts

Hi,

I've just entered into the world of DIY tube amps by bringing a old Audio Innovations gen1 800 series back to life.
Only two hours ago, It played music for the first time in years!

The amp was bought second hand for the transformers and some bundled Telsa NOS tubes, still I decided to attempt repair before scraping the original PCBs.

Anyway: The amp shows clear signs of having had at least two instances of all tubes being damaged, prior to me repairing it, now for the third time.
I need advise on how to prevent this from happening again, as PCB and wiring was barley savable this time and next time the amp will definitely be history.

The damaged components indicate the failure mode is as described here: Audio Innovations
quote: "....the EL34's do their special internal short-circuit trick and destroy the cathode resistors (those who have seen their output valves glowing like fluorescent carrots before the sound expired on one or both channels ..........."

Is this an issue particular to Audio Innovations or is it general for EL34 tubes running UL Class A?

Diagram can be found here
Are there any precautions I can take to increase life expectancy of my latest pride amplifier?

Instead of EL34s I'm now using TAD 6L6 WGC-STR tubes. Matched Pairs for both left and right channels. Paraphase phase splitter is using no-name 12AU7 and input stage is Phillips Miniwatt ECC83.
There used to be a large difference (approx 10%) between Cathode resistors for "Push" and "Pull" sides. These are now within 0.5% of 395ohms.

Cathode decoupling caps had busted and are now replaced by 100V types.
Burned out grid stopper resistors on the "UL" grid has been replaced.

Unloaded B+ is 400 volts. I have not been able to measure B+ under load.

Any other measures I should take?

Thanks
Lars

Carver M500 Cap Reversed?

Hello!

I have received a Carver M500 that blows its main AC fuse at power up.

Studying the schematics and looking inside, I notice evidence of previous cap replacement except the solder joints on the two biggest black caps looks original.

Yet, the orientation of one big black cap seems reversed: C509 should have its Neg leg on the Neg trace below--but it doesn't seem so; it appears they both face the same way:

Shared album - Daniel Martinic (Dan) - Google Photos

Mind you, the one in question is oddly turned about 30 deg.. not sure if that's usual.

Should I unsolder this cap and turn it?

REW room Simulation

Hi,

I have a little room (W)2.38m x (L)2.50x (H)2.70m with some acoustic treatment (2" Owens Corning SelectSound® Black Acoustic Board) in the front and back wall, and I am trying to learn to use REW's Room Simulation to get the proper location for my subwoofers (2x).

My questions are:

-. What I am trying to achieve here? The flattest frequency? Or just to lower the modal resonance lines? A peak its better than a null, as it can be equalized?

-. What is a "good" graph? At some models I have peaks of around 20db, and at others it's much flatter but at lower db. Although a total flat graph it's not achievable.

Thanks in advance!

Attachments

  • Capture2.JPG
    Capture2.JPG
    149 KB · Views: 468

Subwoofer project, opinions plesee.

I'm new to this forum so please bear with me with my lack of knowledge, that is why I'm here after all ☺️

I currently have a Bk monolith plus sub which I'm very happy with and want to add another one. This is where my problem begins.

My wife, who has been incredibly tolerant over the years with my hifi & home theatre purchases has finally put her foot down and said NO to another monolith plus. Not because of the expense, to use her words "were not having another big black monstrosity sat in here".

So, we came to a compromise. If i build two subs and make them look like side tables (walnut veneer, the works) she will be happy with that. I'm no stranger to joinery and confident in my skills, also having a brother as a joiner helps!

The subs are for home theatre only.

My initial thought is to use the same driver and plate amp that go into the monolith, but I'm hoping for opinions and suggestions on drivers and amps. I've been comparing drivers, cabinet volumes and port sizes in Winisd to get ideas but I'm no expert!


The maximum cabinet size I can go to is 18.5"W x 19"H x 32"L and would prefer them to be downfiring, vented subs keeping to a similar tuning as the monolith.
Budget around £1000 for the pair.

What do you think?

Altec-Lansing ACS-340/ACS-295 Questions

have come across a pair of ACS-340 Subwoofers and a pair of ACS-295 Satellite speakers. The Woofers have an 8-pin mini-DIN input receptacles and the Satellites have 7-pin mini-DIN plugs. Anyone have a schematic for either the ACS-295 or the ACS-340 systems?

I would like to "marry" the 295's satellites to BOTH '340 subs for a TRUE stereo subwoofer setup. In my humble opinion, bass is not as non-directional as some would have us audiophiles and DIYers believe.

FYI, the ACS-340's specs are as follows:

Satellites: 13W for both channels (I assume this is 6.5W/Ch)
Mono Sub: 27W total (Probably 13W x 2 channels.

I do not have specs for the '295 satellites.

I have to assume that even these systems have rudimentary active crossovers, and if they do, then I maybe I can take advantage of "retro-fitting" them for some reasonably good performance.

I have tried to contact Altec, but they do NOT release schematics.

Anyway, any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks and '73,


Steve

Road Kill

I can't seem to help myself
I just couldn't resist stopping to pick these all up Yesterday
I have no idea what I am going to do with all of them but the small boxes will soon be speakers for the 11YO Grand-daughter.
I hate building boxes because my woodwork sucks and the speakers I was building for the femme was vetoed by her mother because they were too big, these little ones might just pass muster tho
Your average big box cheap Chinese speaker system but the Teac subwoofer seems to be working
Fortuitously the little 4" woofers I like to play with are a prefect fit in the woofer hole, all I need now is to find a suitable tweeter, I really don't like those $2- Mylar ones at all

Attachments

  • IMG_1338.JPG
    IMG_1338.JPG
    132.5 KB · Views: 362
  • IMG_1339.JPG
    IMG_1339.JPG
    136.3 KB · Views: 361
  • IMG_1340.JPG
    IMG_1340.JPG
    150.5 KB · Views: 369
  • IMG_1341.JPG
    IMG_1341.JPG
    117.9 KB · Views: 352
  • IMG_1343.JPG
    IMG_1343.JPG
    138.3 KB · Views: 356
  • IMG_1344.JPG
    IMG_1344.JPG
    120 KB · Views: 167
  • IMG_1345.JPG
    IMG_1345.JPG
    144.9 KB · Views: 141
  • IMG_1346.JPG
    IMG_1346.JPG
    124.1 KB · Views: 129

which FW diy for Zu Omen II

Hi

first time posting here, though I we been lurking for some time now 🙂

Was looking for a FW amp for my Omens for some time now, but living in Europe they are relatively rare - and pretty expensive, even 2nd hand (especially J2). Economy being what it is i decided to go DIY way and try to build one but I am unsure which one - F6, F5 or perhaps even Aleph J. From what I read it seems that F5/F6 have more authority over bass (which I fell Omens need); though on the other hand there are some that praise M2 for its tubesque qualities - which usually work well with Zu's. Essentially I would be grateful if you have any input and or experience with the said - or similar speakers - and FW amps.

All the best

Gordan

I want to make a pair of 2 ways loudspeakers reusing the drivers from two old identic

Hi out there!

I have two identical 5.1 systems that doesn't work (I think the problem in both are the power supply, but I don't care about that, I'm interesting on reusing the drivers, they are working fine). The pair of 5.1 sets are logitech x-530 models, detailed specs: (Logitech X-530, Continued - 5.1 Surround Sound on the Cheap | Tom's Hardware).

I have the idea of reusing the satellites drivers and the subwoofer of each old system, to build a pair of stereo two ways speakers. I want to build two boxes to accommodate the 10 small drivers for mid/high frequencies, and install the sub to cover the low frequencies. I would buy a pair of two ways passive filters to separate the frequencies (2 ways passive crossovers). I will power the new resultant speakers with a regular 2.0 channels amplifier (38 RMS watts per channel, 4-8 ohms capable).

I have some questions about this project:

1.- how can I wire the 10 small speakers to connect them to the high-pass filter with a total of 4 or 8 ohms resistance?
2.- What point do you recommend for crossing frequencies with these drivers?
3.- Do you miss any aspect in my thoughts about this project?

Many thanks!

"dead" marantz cd 4000

Hello

I have a marantz cd4000 cd player which has been in storage (dry, safe) for several years and was working when went in...now I am wanting to use it, its not responding at all when plugged in - nothing on screen, no response to keypresses, I can hear a slight hum so internal transformers may be active...
I have downloaded schematics and will try to test power distribution - just wondered if anyone had seen anything like this and maybe there's a common cause (e.g. a fuse or weak connector) - also any tips on where you would start looking for the problem would be welcome!

Cheers
John

Some Class A pcbs for sale designed by xrk971/AKSA/JPS64/Jhofland...

Hi, I have some Class A pcbs to sell. Prices are marked at a good discount already, but all offers considered. Shipping is not included. Shipped from Western Canada.

Image 1: Alpha 20 pcb. I have 2 pairs of these with pads and 1 pair without pads. $30 USD / pair.

Image 2: Dual Rail SLB pcb. I have 6 of these. $12 USD / each.

Image 3: ABBB pcb. I have 2 of these. $75 USD / pair.

Image 4: Alpha BB pcb. I have 2 of these. $45 USD / pair.

If interested, please PM me. Also have a look at my other 3 threads posted earlier for some other deals on Tube, Class AB, ClassD pcbs.

Regards,

Myles

Alpha 20 with pads.JPG

Alpha 20.JPG

SLB's.JPG

Alpha Big Boy Buttah.JPG

Alpha Big Boy.JPG

Horn design help me!!

Greetings all!

Im a broke 21 year old college student from Illinois and im usually active on the audio karma forums. I avoid posting here because the site to me is cluttered and confusing, however it seems there are more people on this website and more participation in the threads and just more in depth knowledge in general.


I am planning on getting a CNC mill soon and want to start making flat pack DIY kits for horns to sell to people, and would love to make some two way and three way systems, I just need to know where to start.


Im only 40% through with my degree in mechanical engineering, so my grasp and ability to understand papers and technical mumbo jumbo (which people have showed me and I have read) isn't that great. Its like a can partially grasp what I read on horn design but not fully.

The smartest people are really, the smart people who can explain things in a way easy enough for the common folk to understand it and im hoping one of you are good at this!

What is the best horn geometry? I realize that some horn types are better than others depending on the situation, and wanted to list all the pro's and cons of the different types fo horns.

Ive narrowed it down to 3 designs
can anyone give me a simplified explanation or list of the pro's and con's of
Tractrix horn
Bi-Radial Horn
Conical

any help??

Styroflex Caps Q

Hi Guys,
Are there better sounding caps then the Styro's.
Using it to shunt HF. Notice that different brand
different sound. Overall it's a little too zinggy for
my taste & bright sounding. Toshin have some
PPSD which are cooper foil not cheap & wondering
if it would be better.
Perhaps you guys can advice on other types.
Btw Silver mica also not for me tried Soshin.


Thanks in advance

Book Recommendation for Newbies

I received a book for Christmas and I'm delighted with it. Thought I'd pass the information along.

"Vaccum Tube Amplifier Basics," by EJ Jurich, Fourth Edition. I got the large paperback edition, but there is also a Kindle edition available from the usual places. Very inexpensive.

This is a book aimed at newbies like myself. It explains in clear and concise language how a tube amplifier works, but it's more than dry theory. It contains formulas throughout for calculating resistor and capacitor sizes, how to select a transformer (power and output) and explains different theories such as cathode bypass capacitors, negative feedback, ultralinear design and so on.

It explains and diagrams how to read the kind of schematics one finds on the web, explaining differing styles of notion and layout and what they mean. It shows the symbols for different types of devices, such as caps, pots, resistors, and so on. It explains how they are constructed in limited detail and how to decipher the values from the writing or colors on them, including 'old style' values.

It also talks about mechanical design, layout and construction, with diagrams and photos as well as the schematics for the circuits being built.

It also contains some common tube data at the back of the book, but more importantly, explains what values are important and what they are used for when designing a circuit.

There is a chapter on instrument (guitar) amps, including a project amp one can build, but it is mostly focused on hi-fi uses (although of course there is a huge amount of carryover between the two).

The book has several complete projects that one can build, including an SE 6V6 amp and a RIAA phono preamp and so on. It has some tone controls and explains how to design and then insert them into a circuit.

This book would probably be 'old hat' for anyone who has been building for a long time; most would probably already know this material (and might have differing opinions on some of it). But for newbies such as myself, this book seems to be exactly what I needed for now. Until I become much more advanced, this is what I was after.

One word of warning; the author appears to have a firm belief that expensive components are generally a waste of money and states it at several points in the text. Whether one agrees with that assessment or not is a matter of taste; I merely point out that it is present for those who have a visceral reaction to such statements.

I hope everyone is having great holidays and I thank you for the help you have already given me. Perhaps this may help to give back in some small way.

Help, small 3 way speaker with crossover Rock/Metal

Hello!

Really sorry for long post, i tried to keep it short and detailed. Hope some kind person can help me out, i tried to search clips on youtube and various threads here but i just can't seem to you know.. Decide

I need some help with choosing speakers for my little room. And when i say little its really small, dimensions: 1,75x2,75x2,30 ^^

I want to make a cheap system around 50-150USD if possible.
I have amp (citronic plx 3600) and 5band mixer collecting dust. However i dont think i want to use PA speakers on this but unless you feel like i should then go ahead and please tell me why 😀

I listen to everythyng, but mostly powerfull rock or metall
So aiming on a system that will play rock, heavy metal. and if possible id like to feel the punch in my body but maybe that is hard to achieve with this price tag. If that is the case then please let me know and i will go higher

Biggest outer dimension is 30cm in width, speakers will be placed on a table 1 meter away, I feel like there is room for a 10" bass driver

I have built a ported subwoofer box before which actually turned out really good. so im atleast not completely new to the building part. I've dabbled with my car audio for 10 years but never really dived into this hi-fi world like i intend to do now gradually.

This is my first system so i just want to try it out and take it from there



But like i said in the beginning, i need help choosing a crossover and a set of speakers that work well for the specifications above
Is there kits that can be found or can you point me in the right direction maybe?

If you have questions just fire away and i will get back to you asap!

CS4396 DAC With Transformer Balanced Out

CS4396 Based DAC that had the output OPAMPS removed and Sescom M-14 Transformers installed for balanced out. I built this years ago - used it for quite some time until I started using my Wolfson based DAC...

To keep everything intact, I encased all of the delicate circuitry in hot glue...works great.

More info on DAC

Experience with this DIY DAC ?

$75 + ship or pickup in West Sub of Chicago?

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    961.3 KB · Views: 349
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    823.3 KB · Views: 341
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    718.8 KB · Views: 338

SoundStream L1.2100d pwm driver output

Good morning everyone, friends, this time I come to ask you for help, an amplifier of the soundstream brand has arrived again and in my last experience I had with another like it, it went wrong but this time the failure is that I have frequency very low in the output fets of only 16khz, what I have been looking for is how to increase their frequency ?, I have seen them working at 118khz in advance greetings

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20200418-125851_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20200418-125851_Gallery.jpg
    286.5 KB · Views: 117
  • Screenshot_20200418-125933_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20200418-125933_Gallery.jpg
    258 KB · Views: 111
  • Screenshot_20200418-125945_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20200418-125945_Gallery.jpg
    290.6 KB · Views: 110

Newbie question about F6 PS

I just finished building the PS for my F6 project. Using the Universal Power Supply board, I stuffed it with parts from the BOM in the build here:
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1006/5046/files/P-PSU-1V30-bom.xls?15967766640867126881

I'm using an Antek AS-4218 (400VA, 18V).

I'm getting 26.8 volts out of each side. I was expecting 24.

Is this going to be too much for the F6? If so, should I chose differs values for R1 through R8?

BTW: I'm using 25V 15,000uf caps.

Thanks,
Peter

RCA Switch Box Help...

Hi.

Hope everyone is managing OK through this crazy time.

Helping a friend build a switch box for his system.

Here is the challenge...

There are two sources in his system. A turntable, and everything else...

He has two phono stages. One Tube with volume control (EAR834P) and a solid state one.

He wants to be able to switch between the two pending music played. This part is simple...

As the solid state Phono Stage is fed into a different preamp, and the EAR834P is bypassing it, they need to be isolated from each other. Still simple.

Both the the signal paths go through a High Pass filter in all cases to the Amp.

The signal is also split prior to the high pass from both sources and is sent to the Subwoofer.

The signal paths here also need to be separated from each other.

Getting more complicated.

What I am hoping to do is do all this switching with a single rotary switch, and put the switching as well as the high pass filter in a single box solution.

Too many wires running around the way it sits now...

I've attempted to draw a breakdown of how the flow needs to happen. Hope it makes sense...

Option 1 is using the EAR834P, Option 2 is running it through the SS Phone Stage.

How can I achieve this with a single rotary switch? Don't want to have three separate switches for him to have to flip back and forth.

Thanks!!!

P

Attachments

  • Swich Box 1.jpg
    Swich Box 1.jpg
    191.9 KB · Views: 123
  • Switch Box 2.jpg
    Switch Box 2.jpg
    191.8 KB · Views: 126

Keeping busy during lock down more projects

Having fun trying to amuse myself since the lock down started. Figured I was line stage poor so I started drilling holes and putting stuff together or I should say mocking it up. Waiting for parts to arrive but I can share what I have so far for your criticism.

Aikido 6Au6/5687 And Aikido 6SJ7/6SN7 with 5693's and 5692's in the sockets.

Attachments

  • DSC04710.jpg
    DSC04710.jpg
    446.3 KB · Views: 262
  • DSC04711.jpg
    DSC04711.jpg
    405.3 KB · Views: 260
  • DSC04712.jpg
    DSC04712.jpg
    426.2 KB · Views: 246

Sony XM-3060 RCA

Hi there,

Picked up a Sony XM-3060 with a missing RCA shield, hoping it would be an easy fix. Well turns out not so easy finding the 10 pin RCA jack that Sony used. I checked all the other RCA"s I had to see if I could remove a shield and pop it on with no luck. I can find 9 pin RCA's that look like they may work. As far as I can tell A-F are the positive inputs and the three G's are the negative shared ground. I don't believe the tenth pin between D and E does anything

here's a couple possible replacements?
thanks for your time

Amazon.com: uxcell AV Concentric Outlet 6 RCA Female Jack 9-Pin Connector Socket Panel Mount 5pcs: Electronics

Input RCA jack for HiFonics, Autotek, Crunch,Lanzar, ect | eBay

Attachments

  • AA00CFF0-223C-4EB7-BC0F-AAC8EB015485.jpg
    AA00CFF0-223C-4EB7-BC0F-AAC8EB015485.jpg
    795.3 KB · Views: 111
  • 74B6DDEB-597A-4119-A22C-06B59682D005.jpg
    74B6DDEB-597A-4119-A22C-06B59682D005.jpg
    812.2 KB · Views: 234
  • F9FA41CB-53ED-4C23-9EA8-8088AC3B2776.jpg
    F9FA41CB-53ED-4C23-9EA8-8088AC3B2776.jpg
    862.6 KB · Views: 109

Luxman M120-A, Flameproof Resistor?

I’m servicing my M-120a power amp that had a noisy right channel. Swapped out a 2Sc2240 and 2SA970 in the input stage - seems to have fixed it.

These two components are on a part of the PCB that appears to have suffered some long term heat damage - nearby a 1W 39k resistor that seems to be the culprit.

Interestingly the service manual states this as needing to be a “flameproof metal film resistor”. I’m tempted to just replace with a 3W normal metal film resistor, and mount this on the reverse side of the board to keep heat away from other components. Any problem with this approach? What’s different about flameproof specd resistors apart from obviously not catching alight if overheated? Do they behave differently when heat stressed? Do they fuse? Should I be using one as a replacement?

After nine faithful years my beautiful sounding SSE DIED last night. Please help!

True, she's not much to look at. It was my first project and I was expecting it to blow up when I switched it on for the first time so I didn't put too much thought into the cabinet, or anything much really, as you can see. But it worked a treat from the get go and I loved the sound so much, and was lazy, so there it stayed for nearly ten years.

Now it's dead.

First the right channel would drop out sometimes, then reappear. Eventually it stopped working altogether. I put it down to ten year old tubes so I replaced the lot. No change, still just the left channel. Then that promptly died too, and the fuse blew.

I've turned it upside down and got the toolbox out, but it was a long time ago and I don't know what I'm looking at any more. I've checked obvious things like physical connections and they're fine, or at least look it. Nothing obviously cooked that I can see. I'm just about to remove the board and have a look at the other side.

:sad:

Attachments

  • deceased SSE.JPG
    deceased SSE.JPG
    126.8 KB · Views: 239

marantz cd4000

Hi everybody

Currently have a marantz cd4000 everthing works fine apart from
the display says no disc the disc does not spin just twitches a fraction stops and twitches again

Is this a simple vam1201 replacement or could it be board trouble instead .

The laser has been cleaned once with a dry brush disc and with alcohol on a cotton bud still same....

Appreciate any help as dont want to waste money on laser

Doctorjohn Cheaptubeaudio: Audio Reviews

Please stay tuned..
Full review of TU-8800 with Lundahl will be available soon..


Doctorjohn Cheaptubeaudio: Audio Reviews and More: Elekit TU-8800VK Lundahl Tansformers Tube Rolling TU-8300


Review: Elekit TU-8800 (VK), Part II, Lundahl Transformers, Tube Rolling
Review: Elekit TU-8300, Part II

Elekit TU-8800, Part I (has a pic of stock output transformers; tested with LS3/5A)
Elekit TU-8300, Part I

Klipsch Heresy Part III (for system description and general characteristics)

Note: This is a very long article, particularly the section on Tube Rolling. You may want to jump to the section(s) that interest you the most.

Prologue After I wrote my Elekit TU-8800, Part I, the LTA MicroZOTL arrived and I basically just got deeply immersed for quite a long while. This article is mainly about the detailed tests I am doing now. But in the interim I did re-visit a bit. with YL Horns I did pair it up briefly with my (104 db) YL horns. With the Siemens Top O-Getter 12AT7 and current production Russian "Genalex" KT88, the sound was somewhat too sharp, especially at high volume. This was interesting to me as the same tubes worked very well with my much less efficient (87 db) LS 3/5A's. I took this to mean a little too much power/gain for my horns. 6V6 I then swapped in my RCA 6V6's. Sound audibly improved but was still not entirely satisfactory. I then got diverted by other things. Used as an amp/Gain Issue As I usually have too many sources, I almost always use these Japanese amps (just an amp with a volume knob) as amps, preceded by an active preamp. With Elekit TU-8800, as with my TU-8300, the gain is very high, so the volume knob could not be turned up too much. Even then I encountered a unique problem: occasionally, with a dirty LP, a loud click or pop was enough to trigger the protection circuit of the Elekit, which would then mute itself and the green indicator lamp would partially turn orange red. Turning it off and on again would regain normalcy. This indicated to me again the issue of gain and the amp would better be used as an integrated amp (or as an amp with a passive preamp or TVC). This has happened with my TU-8300 before too.

This unit of TU-8800 is a fully assembled loan unit from vkmusic. I was told it is bone stock except for 2 coupling caps.

With the Klipsch Heresy I System
So, now that I have set up my living room system, I set out to do more testing on it. For those not familiar with my Heresy system, please first read the Heresy link above. A brief re-cap of the system:


Turntable (stereo): Thorens TD-124 Mk I with Thomas Schick 12" arm and Goldbug Clement II MC Cartridge.
Turntable (mono): Technics SL-1200 Mk II with Denon DL-102 Mono Cartridge。
Phonoamp: Arcam rPhono (to Gotham GAC-2111 interconnect)
CD Player: Magnavox CDB 262 (to Gotham DGS-1 interconnect)
Amp: Elekit TU-8800 (Belden 9497 loudspeaker cable)
Speakers: Klipsch Heresy I (alnico)
Subwoofer: Pioneer SW-8 (connected to amp with generic cable)

I started with the same Siemens 12AT7 and Russian KT88. It was immediately apparent that the sound was better than with the YL horns. It was already enjoyable but a little more sweetness in the massed strings, particularly when they really dig in (this is very challenging for systems), would not be amiss.

Pearl
12AT7 First, I swapped in a pair of old-stock GE D-getter 12AT7, and the sound immediately and considerably sweetened. The massed strings now only had a trace of the metallic about them. The soundstage moved back quite a bit. Yes, I lost a little resolution but I got more music. This confirmed much of what I believe of Siemens tubes - many of them are forward and lean (almost transistor-like sometimes) and are best used in vintage systems that are overly warm (usually not in spec).

Output Tube Rolling It is not often that I have the time to do much tube rolling. I usually do the minimal necessary to get the sound I want. With more time on hand at the moment, I decided to do this review justice. I randomly pulled out a few types (all old stock; see pic at bottom) to test. I tested them in no particular order, and as I went along, I pulled out more and more tubes. So this is a lengthy read. I shall also talk more about these tubes after I finish the review proper, to make it yet lengthier. You have been warned.


6V6GT Then, I dropped in a pair of RCA smoked glass 6V6GT (lowering the output to around 2 watts; remember to switch the Power Mode to Low) and the sound further improved. Now, I could play anything. It doesn't have the grunt of the KT88 but the power is enough for me even in this large room for Arethra Franklin's I never loved a man the way I loved you and Janis Joplin's Pearl. No pounding bass but the full impact of the music comes across loud and clear. Those 4 live bonus tracks (1970 Canadian Festival Express Tour) in the Joplin CD are even better than the album proper; the immediacy is life-affirming! Similarly, Celibidache's 1969 performance of Bruckner's 4th with the Swedish RSO (DG) is coherent and compelling. Now, all these albums mentioned, though reasonably well recorded, do not belong to the top tier in audio quality, but musically they are compelling. Triode/UL I tried both again and found the difference in sound quality as well as nominal power much less than expected (probably more apparent with higher powered tubes) and so left the amp in Ultralinear Mode. vs LTA MicroZOTL The Elekit with 6V6 is roughly in the same power envelope as the LTA. But, as expected, the LTA has a more naturally fast transient and reveal more rhythmic felicities and subtleties.

6550 I next dug out a pair of old-stock 3-getter Tung-Sol 6550 (this is a very fine tube, best of the 6550's) and installed them. By now I was listening to Rudolf Serkin playing Mozart Piano Concertos (with Abbado; DG). A repeat showed the sound to be further improved. The soundstage is larger and there is more detail compared to the 6V6GT. It is still quite smooth. Then I found out I had not changed the Power Mode before the swap (still in Low Power Mode). I turned off the power, changed to High Power Mode and turned it back on. Even more air and definition. I replayed the Janis Joplin CD. Surely it sounds more punchy, more controlled, and the vocals and instruments become clearer. An unqualified success. It got so good that I played Hugh Masekela's Hope and played a few track with relish. The attack and presence of the Heresy is highly gratifying (the non verbal expletives highly stirring), and the percussion and bass are very decent. The audiophile's favorite stimela plays with momentum, virility and satisfactory slam. Of course, again, with the 8" subwoofer, when it comes to bass it is not as good as my YL's 15" woofer, but it is satisfying enough and tightly argued. I'd not think of playing this track with 2 watts (6V6) for enjoyment (testing is a different matter). But it is not all about impact; the system brings out all the atmosphere in Nick Cave's The Boatman's Call. In this outstanding album, the mournful, the confessional and the spiritual create a groove of their own, as powerful as any uptempo material. Sparse but beautifully shaded instrumental effects punctuate the landscape established by the moody keyboard and Cave's voice (one thing I like about him is his clear vocals; you don't have to read the lyrics). Yes, horns let you feel the mood better than conventional transducers. So far so good.

Nick cave and the bad seeds-the boatman's call.jpgPower Mode I want to take the time here to emphasize the importance of checking this when one changes Power Tubes. The amps has 3 positions: LOW (6V6, 6F6); MID (6L6 family, 7591, EL34) and HIGH (KT66, KT77, KT88, 6550, KT 120/150). When I changed to the 6550 (above) I by mistake (using the 6V6 setting previously) started with the LOW, which gave it a softer sound because of the lower B+. That was OK. BUT, if I now want to swap back to the 6V6 and forgot to set it back to LOW, I would likely run into trouble as now I'd be running the 6V6 at too high a B+, even if I am sure Elekit runs the amp conservatively. Keep in mind you can safely run a power tube at a lower B+ (with a change in sound, as per my experience) for fun and experiment, but not the other way. I am not sure whether I can do this on the fly, so I didn't try. So, always check.

5881 This is a rugged 6L6WGB type that can withstand higher voltage (as per instruction, I used the Mid Position). The pair are Tung-Sol's, even if one is marked RCA. Here I got my first disappointment. It has neither the sheer brilliance and output of the Tung-Sol 6550 nor the musicality of the RCA 6V6.

EL34 Keeping the Mid Setting, I swapped in a pair of Mullard xf2 EL34 (labelled HP). The sound is very good. It sounds detailed and powerful, enough to almost rival the Tung-Sol 6550, yet is musical enough to rival the RCA 6V6G. In fact, it made the 6V6GT sound just a little veiled. It is also a little smoother than the Tung-Sol 6550, which likely means different things to different people. To the average vintage lover who crave tube warmth (usually overly so) that is great; but to someone like me the leading edge is just a little too rounded, making the sound, sweet as it is, not as life-like, and isn't that the primary goal of horn users? But one can see why this tube is popular in SE amp configuration. My first SE amp was the first generation Audion Sterling over 20 years ago, and it was a good sounding amp. Later I got into Direct-Heated Triodes, and one of my 300B amps was again the (first gen) Audion Silver Night. There is no doubt in my mind about which Audion amp is better.

6V6G Given the findings above I set my sight on testing more 6V6 types. I wasn't thinking of 6L6G but I chanced upon a pair of Zenith 6V6G and used them (Low Setting). An utter surprise! It gave a mesmerizing, flesh-and-blood performance! It is not the surprisingly detailed sound that is so impressive. Images are larger and more palpable. In the Nick Cave album, the second half is a little less somnolent than the first, and there are more instrumental flourishes, which I dig (including a violin). In Idiot Prayer, Nick Cave's voice acquires more gravitas and urgency, and the various instrumental flashes have the truest timber (nowhere is this more apparent than the pizzicati). The most impressive thing is, good as some of the other tubes are, this sets down the mood more effortlessly. You don't have to get it; it gets to you. Downside? Yes, for the first time I hear some clipping in loud passages. This is known, the G has lower power rating than the GT. But for simpler music (I count this Nick Cave album among them) it is hard to best.

6L6G Inspired by the 6V6G and, given the uninspiring performance of the related 5881, I swapped in a pair of RCA smoked glass 6L6G. Mind you, the 6L6G sounds magical in my WE 124B amp, albeit in push-pull. As expected, the sound is very good and has much of the same qualities of the 6V6G. But there are differences: it is slightly less detailed; the images are a little less fleshy and the instrumental timbers a little sweeter (not to the extent of EL34). While in terms of presence it is edged out by the 6V6G, it has the advantage of more power (doesn't clip). A very fine effort.

6V6GT/VT-107A I continued my 6V6 testing by swapping in an older pair of 6V6GT that is also marked with the military designation VT-107A (the RCA logo is also larger). In my experience, early VT- designated tubes are usually superior, and it so proved. Compared to the first pair of 6V6GT I used, it upped the game considerably. This older GT tube has a little more detail and even better presence, dynamics and flow. Like the other pair of 6V6GT, images are smaller and it is less dramatic than the 6V6G. It has the advantage of greater power and is quite effortless with most material. Overall performance is excellent.

KT66 The sound of the (old-stock) GEC KT66 proved yo be as fat as its profile. It is a rich sounding tube, even smoother than the EL34, but its transient edge is even slower. It is obvious the Nick Cave album moves at a more deliberate pace. Of course, presence is not its strong suit. When I replaced it with the VT-107A I was immediately revived by more air and pace.


KT88 Now, although this amp has 3 power modes and allows you to use all kinds of tubes, I suspect it was voiced with KT88, as it is the only tube marked in bold on the Power Mode sticker label. So I was curious about the old-stock GEC KT88., made by the UK to counter the high-powered US 6550. The US never made this tube, and in my experience all latter-day and current productions don't hold a candle to it (as evidenced here by the Russian "Genalex"). Sure enough, this excellent (and very expensive) tube performed wonderfully, very much in the vein of the 6550, though a little warmer and also a little less excitable. With all the power available (like the 6550, the chassis is notably warmer than when the 2 lower power modes are used), Chabrier's Espana (Ansermet, London) was well controlled yet crackled with excitement. With plentiful air, this tube effortlessly separated the various strands in the back-up to Cave's vocals, and the violin and pizzacati are truthful. Compared to its British cousins EL34 and KT66, it does less beautifying, and has better air, leading edge and transients. Although it is still not as neutral and doesn't convey the mood as well as the best of the 6V6/6L6 family, it is still highly musical and has more power to boot. Wonderful!

Back to 6L6G To check on myself, after the very good performance of the KT88, I re-installed the 6L6G and, sure enough, I stand by my words. Whether it is the vocals or timbers of the various instruments (like the burst of the Hammond or the wail of the violin), this tube is still more truthful than the KT88. And the music moves along even more. And, yes, the mood. I firmly know, for me, since I can get away with it, I'll stick with 6L6G, 6V6G and VT107A.

Back to VT-107A At the end of tube rolling, I re-installed the VT-107A, and the impression is the same. This is the tube I am going to use day-to-day.

Enter the TU-8300 (pics at bottom of article) At this point I swapped in my TU-8300 (see Part I). Design vs TU-8800 The two amps have a lot of similarity. The first half of the 12AT7 is capacitor coupled to the second half, which then is capacitor coupled to and drives the output tube. Both amps employ feedback from the 8 ohm output tap. Both amps have protection circuits. The biggest difference is that the TU-8300 is Triode only (for 300B as well as medium to high powered beam and pentode tubes, such as 6L6GC, EL34, 6550, KT88, though sadly not 6V6) whereas the TU-8800 is switchable between Triode and Ultralinear and can also use low powered tubes like 6V6 (but no 300B). Of course, due to the ultralinear feature, the output transformers of the TU-8800 require extra taps and are more expensive to make. It should be noted both amps belong to Elekit's top offerings. The older 8300 does not even have an earphone output, and has only one input (a nuisance). The 8800 is much better ergonomically, has 2 RCA inputs (one wired parallel to a minijack input) and does have an earphone output connected to the transformer output. Unlike the desktop-driven design of TU-8150 (here), for someone like me who use only the RCA inputs, these extra's do not interfere with the signal path. 8300 Mods As mentioned in Part I, I did some modifications to the TU-8300 (pic at bottom). I replaced the input RCA sockets, hardwired the input with Belden 8451, changed the potentiometer to an older generic type (unlike others, I regard older designs as better, and they are really cheap) and hardwired it to the circuit board with the conductors inside the same Belden 8451. I also changed the two coupling caps on each side to Russian military PIO. Earlier, in an attempt to lower the input sensitivity, I had wired resistors to the input but I later took them out as it was not very effective. The resultant sound is a little warmer than the original. Used as Integrated Amp As discussed at the start of the article, due to high input sensitivity, both amps are better used as integrated amps. For the purpose of this article I did that for both amps. For the 8300 I had to change cables when I switched sources. I had actually never previously used the 8300 as an integrated amp. Used this way, it is actually much quieter than I thought. 300B I started with the Shuguang 300B. Initially, I was taken by surprise. Using the same albums, the vocal and instrumental placements in the soundstage were noticeably different than before, the color was darker, the bass was muddy and things fell apart with orchestral tutti. I was not happy and after some thought swapped out the Mullard 12 AT7's and swapped in the GE's I had been using in the 8800. Good Lord! Now the 8300 with the 300B sounds almost identical to the 8800! A lot of people go for Mullard, but not me. Aside from a few specific types, it has its own colored, usually fat and veiled sound. The GE sounds much more neutral and correct. Thus tubed, the 300B turned in an equivalent performance to the best of the beam/pentode tubes. I expected this, as imho the 300B is one of the few successful modern tube production stories (of course NOS true WE300B is better, but that's untouchable). Russian KT88 Satisfied, and as I was not going to do all that tube rolling again, I just tested what I started with, the Russian "Genalex", and the result was pretty good, much as it performed in the 8800. Pointers vs. 8800 Keep in mind the 8300 had been modified to yield a warmer sound, so it is right to conclude the 8800 is a little warmer than the stock 8300. Even more obvious, although the 8300 is quite quiet, the TU-8800 is dead-quiet. With some of the tubes, there is no noise whatsoever; with some others, there may be a little noise, but I am confident it is tube noise/rush. Keep in mind with 97 db loudspeakers tube noise is an issue.

The Lundahl Transformers!
And, now gentlemen...the high point of this review. It is not every day that one gets to compare transformers! VK of vkmusic is a perfectionist who for the longest time has been offering upgrades for many of the Elekit kits he sells. These were usually capacitor and resistor upgrades (some of the resistors had to be custom made). Since the acclaimed TU-8600 300B amp, VK Music has gone further, offering upgraded transformers in cooperation with Lundahl. It is an arduous and time consuming task. VK informed me that the final version has three previous prototypes. In the top pic you can see they are even beefier and heavier than the stock ones. Installation This proved to be a bit challenging. It was not difficult to remove the stock transformers and wires, but the metal bracket they are mounted on was a problem. This is because there was not enough clearance on the right side of the chassis to allow lifting of the bracket. And because the screws of the Lundahl transformers have to be mounted from the bottom (see pic). I did not want to do the unsoldering needed to remove the circuit board. What I did was to stand the chassis on its right side. This way the bracket can be tilted 45 degrees from the chassis, allowing tight room to work (especially with the right output trans). I first got the screws in with my hand holding just the bit, then use a 90 degree screwdriver for the final tightening. The obvious message is it is much easier to have the upgraded trannies when one starts to build the kit! If not, one can upgrade with a little more effort.


Cover shows a close up of Cash's face, looking at the camera.TU-8800VK--Sonic Impressions I continued to use the GE 12AT7, the Low Power Mode and VT-107A. Brand new transformers take quite a while to run-in, but I'll cut to the chase: Now I am at around 30 hours; even without much run-in, the Lundahl Transformers are a significant Upgrade! From the first note of the Nick Cave album I noticed the difference. I replayed every album and also a few new ones. How one transformer is better than another is sometimes a subtle (but very important) thing that is hard to describe, harder than say the difference in sound between resistors or caps. Changing the transformer changes everything and it is hard to separate the impovement into components, but I shall say a few words on the sonic merits:
Ease of Flow Elekit, especially the 8800 (and the 8300), has a neutral and resolving sound. With the right tubes, as described in the tube rolling section, the flow can be impressive, but with the Lundahl's, it is significantly enhanced. This is as true for Nick Cave as for classical music. Paray's Dvorak 9th (Mercury CD) was as exciting as ever, yet totally non-grating. To me, better ease of flow is at least partly due to better microdynamics. As in real life, ease is a precious thing; unlike in real life in this case you can for sure buy it with money.
Enhanced Bandwidth This is immediately obvious and the most objective parameter. There is more air in the treble and a cleaner, more tactile, yet punchier, bass. It changes Nick Cave's vocals and the piano tone, now even clearer (sometimes even ethereal) and more resolving. All the instruments have more sheen. In classical music, it is obvious the soundstage is also significantly deeper and airier.
Sweet Presence Generally speaking, presence, or the feeling of a live performance, requires a fast transient attack (and horns) and can come at the expense of a little sweetness. Not so here. The Lundahl, even with increased bandwidth, makes everything sweeter, yet presence is enhanced. Johnny Cash At Folsom Prison (Legacy) is an excellent live recording. Here, the audience is perfectly captured, Cash's voice smoky, the guitars sweet and beautifully delineated. In Jackson, a duet, June Carter is just dynamite!
More Forgiving of Tubes As you have read from the Tube Rolling section, I roll tubes a bit to find out what I like (usually a neutral sound, but it has to convey presence and mood). Given the increased ease in sound, I suddenly had the idea to give some of the tubes I did not quite like before another shot. I rolled in the Russian "Genalex" KT88 and, surely, the performance is significantly better than before, less etched when the going gets rough. Keeping the output tube the same, I then tried out the 12AT7's which are so critical to the sound. The Siemens 12AT7 is still a little forward but it is now quite acceptable. The Mullard 12AT7 is still a little too dark and veiled for my taste, but it also performed very well. So, "rolling" transformers is even more effective than rolling tubes, when done right.
TU-8800VK--Earphone Tests I use earphones only on occasion, so this is brief. I first connected my Beyerdynamic DT880 (97 db, 600 ohms) and listened with satisfaction to Otto Klemperer conducting the Philharmonia in Dvorak's 9th (Angel, LP). But when I played the Nick Cave CD I realized the proceedings were a little heavy and the bass not well resolved. I was sure that is an impedance question, and so switched to the lower impedance AKG K701 (105 db, 62 ohms). Sure enough, that immediately cleaned up the sound and improved the flow, and now it resembled the sound via the loudspeakers. I see there are internal 6-position dip switches that select resistors, surely for impedance and level matching, but lacking the manual and not willing to open the chassis again I will leave it at that.
Comments on TU-8800(VK)
Stock Version As I'd expect from Elekit, the TU-8800 is a very capable amp. A decade on from the TU-8300, the TU-8800 is a lot more versatile and ergonomically desirable. As I'd also expect from Elekit, it is a very neutral amp that reveals every change in tubes and components. Even with current production tubes, it turns in a very good performance. Highly Recommended.
Lundahl (VK) Version The million dollar question is, at a premium of roughly half the cost of the stock amp, is the transformer upgrade worth it? Experienced tube users, especially vintage aficionados, know just how important, and how costly, good transformers are. Personally, I am very impressed by these Lundahl transformers. They confer abundantly that most precious Final Touch, and that elevates a very good product to an outstanding one. A lot of DIY people spend a lot of money upgrading caps and resistors but, I tell you, as reported just above, changing the transformer is even more transformative! Old stock tubes are expensive and, unless one already has a stash (like I), to me it pays to start with the better transformers. Enthusiastically Recommended. In fact, it had me thinking about upgrading the transformers of my TU-8300 (this Lundahl is not suitable). Also, if I don't already have the TU-8300 and the 6V6 based TU-8150, I'd buy the TU-8800VK without hesitation. It is also time for me to do some surgery on the TU-8150 (bypassing the earphone and mini-jack input that I don't use) to bring its performance closer to the 6V6 in TU-8800 (though unfortunately there is no transformer upgrade).
Tube Rolling Given the versatility of the amp, tube rolling is a temptation most cannot resist. Yet I'd like to give some guidelines here. In general, I think, even with the most humble of tubes (the current stuff) one can get a good sound. Get your system right before you go crazy rolling tubes! There are priorities. No amount of tube rolling is going to save a system that is intrinsically unbalanced. But, when you get your system to sound right, tube rolling becomes the coveted final touch. In this article, because of my stash, I can indulge in some of the best, but this is just for reference as to how far one can take the amp to. Here, I'd like to remind you upgrading to the Lundahl transformers is more essential than spending a large sum of money rolling tubes.
12AT7 This is very critical, and your system and taste shall likely come into play. Experienced tube users know that the input/driver tube(s) have as much, if not more, effect as the power tubes. Unlike the many tube "gurus" out there I usually shy away from a recommendation, because I believe there is no best tube (aside from old-stock tubes are better than current ones), and context (a system approach) is just as important. That said, I do believe the old-stock GE D-getter 12AT7 (not that rare) is a very fine mate with this amp. A new pair is not that expensive and used and test good tubes much cheaper on Ebay.
High Power Output Tubes With higher B+, more inefficient loudspeakers can be driven adequately, as evidenced in my Part I Report with the 87 db LS 3/5A. But, even with my 97 db Heresy's, the higher power mode still performed admirably. Basically, I think the designer designed it using the KT88 as prototype. Even the Russian "Genalex" KT88 sounds pretty good (especially with the Lundahl's), and I'd wager the KT120/150 would too. I'd avoid the KT66. And the performance of the genuine old-stock GEC KT88 propelled the amp into another league altogether. But the genuine item is very expensive and off-putting to most people. The old-stock Tung-Sol 6550 is almost as good, but cheaper. Enough said.
Medium Power Output Tubes I'd think EL34 is worthwhile. If you already have a stash of EL34 or 6L6GC/WGB etc you would have some fun. I certainly have not tested the vast 6L6 family extensively, but for now I can recommend only 6L6G.
Low Power Output Tubes If your system allows the use of low powered tubes, greater power to you! For me, I just love the flea-powered 6V6. Old-stock 6V6's are very reasonably priced, but I know not many can use this kind of flea-power. But, if your loudspeakers are efficient, and your room is small, try it for not that much money! You will be surprised! For me, a horn user, it is my preference.
Power Mode Switch I'd like to implore you once again that it is imperative for you to check the position of the switch when you change power tubes.
Integrated Amp vs. Power Amp If you want to connect more than 2 sources and if you have to use a preamp, make sure it is one without gain (passive, TVC, or even Elekit's own TU-8500 in Unity Gain mode).
There! It took forever to write this article on a Windows XP!

Top, L to R: 6V6GT, VT107A, 5881, 6V6G, 6L6G;
Bottom: L to R: EL34, 6550, KT66, KT88




Elekit TU-8300 in action

Innards of the TU-8300

New build Class A amp temperature question

I usually build Class AB, never built a Class A amp before.

My first build Class A amp, I think output is 15W pure Class A.
Each channel using two pairs NJW1302 / NJW3281 running 500mA idle current per transistor with +-22.5V supply voltage.

The heatsink size 30cm x 12cm base thickness is 5mm with 12 mm small fins.

Now my room temperture is around 27'C and the heatsink temperature will be 65'C, my finger can touch the heatsink but can not stay on the it more than 2 second.

I want to know for a 15W output Class A amp, how high a temperature the transistor will be in danger. Summer is coming, at that time the heatsink temperature must be very high, I want to know the safety temperature range to run the amp in Summer.

Best regards,
Patrick

Attachments

  • class a_170407.jpg
    class a_170407.jpg
    272 KB · Views: 159
  • class a_170149.jpg
    class a_170149.jpg
    332 KB · Views: 150
  • class a_170201.jpg
    class a_170201.jpg
    181.2 KB · Views: 154
  • class a_170238.jpg
    class a_170238.jpg
    143.8 KB · Views: 155
  • class a amp 1.jpg
    class a amp 1.jpg
    160 KB · Views: 182

DIY Power supply for a Szekeres headphone amp

Hi all!
I'm new here. This forum looks great 🙂 I hope I'll find my answears here.


I'm going to build my first audio DIY project: a szekeres amp


First: I choose the szekeres because of it's simple design, and I've heard it sounds good. I'll use it for a Sennheiser HD565 on a computer (with sblive).
Is this a good choice? Or do better amps exist (better and not really more complicated) ?



Do you have some advices on the szekers model that sound the best? (DC coupled; CCS...)
My first choice is to build the latest one that is on headwise's site: (if nobody tells me it's a poor choice)

http://headwize2.powerpill.org/projects/showproj.php?file=szeke1_prj.htm
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.




Now, I'm working on the PS. I've heard the szekeres are very sensible to ps quality, anr ripples. So I'm going to buils th PS myself, and not buy a regulated PS (a friend gave me a torroid transformer 2 days ago, so I haven't to buy the main part)

I'm thinking about using this model:

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


It's a ZenV4 PS. IMHO the design is good. But the values (especially for the condensers) are to be changed.

The problem is: how much will be good?

The transformer is a 230V (primary) 12V (secondary) 50VA. Will it be enough to drive a stereo szekeres?

What do you think about all this?
Can you give me some good values for the condensers?



Thanks a lot 🙂

5HA7 5HC7 tubes quantity 56

There are 56 in the box. $35 shipped 48 states for all of them in the box shown.

These are new old stock as when I got them a few years ago. They must have been really dirty as it looks like someone cleaned them and took the numbers right off!

5 volt filament for two triodes, one section is a 12AX7 and the other is a 12AU7

Attachments

  • 5ha7 (1).jpg
    5ha7 (1).jpg
    724.6 KB · Views: 71
  • 5ha7 (2).jpg
    5ha7 (2).jpg
    568.8 KB · Views: 80
  • 5ha7 (3).jpg
    5ha7 (3).jpg
    587.9 KB · Views: 70

Musical Fidelity integrated amp compatibly question

Hi. My friends have an old musical fidelity B1 integrated amp - currently only used to listen to CDs. I want to buy them a new Rega Planar 1, but I’m concerned about whether these two would be compatible due to the age difference? It’s a surprise present & (also due to current social distancing rules) I can’t see a way of finding out what connections are on offer with the MF. The Rega states that the amp must have phono MM. So, basically, can someone tell me if it’s possible to plug a new Planar 1 into an old Musical Fidelity B1 and for them to work? 😕
PS please don’t go all technical on me - I have only a very basic understanding of all things electrical. Cheers

STK082G module from old DUAL amp

I used brutal force to open STK082G hybrid module from old DUAL amp. Most people, including me, presume that defunct module is due to fail output transistors but it seems to me that output transistors are OK, nothing seems fried. But there is one SMD component, I am not sure if it's resistor or cap, that seems like the color of body is spilled around the component.

I am so sorry to see such advanced component to be discarded just because SMD component failed, if that's the reason. After all discrete components could easily be serviced, but if you have to throw away complete power amplifier just because one SMD component... Hybrid modules looked like such smart idea...And they sound very good too...

Attachments

  • STK082G inside photo.jpg
    STK082G inside photo.jpg
    587.7 KB · Views: 228

Sumo Polaris: What capacitors should be replaced?

I have a couple of original Sumo Polaris amps which are over 30 years old. I would like some suggestions on what capacitors I should and shouldn't change. I just replaced all the capacitors in a Sumo Athena. I also purchased identical spec power supply capacitors for the Polaris (Nichicon Super Through). However, some of the capacitors for the amp's PCB I can not find replacements with identical specs. For example the C9 (Culver, 16 uF - 50vdc - NP). Would it be alright to go higher in capacitance on that capacitor? My guess is it would not be ideal. I would also like suggestions on brand and types of replacements. I don't mind doing slight modifications either if it will result in better sonics and open to all suggestions. I am looking for the best possible replacements. I care about the amplifier as its been in my family for a long time. Thank you!

Attachments

  • SumoPolarisPCB.jpg
    SumoPolarisPCB.jpg
    751.5 KB · Views: 267

Letting amps clip or running a limiter?

In a situation where your speakers would have a peak limiter set higher than the maximum peak output voltage of their connected amplifier would it be better to set a zero attack limiter with a short release time (4mS) just below the clip limit of the amplifier or to let the amplifier clip? if so how far below the maximum output voltage of the amplifier would you set the limiter?

Hello and Thanks!

Hi Guys.

Im a real rooky with Amps, I really love electronics and love amps and music gear, recently finished a technician electronics so I know some of it, but want to learn the real deal and since I like Amps I think I will go for investigating and creating a few ones, I just recently finished a TDA2050 amp which works fine but not satisfied yet.

Thanks and looking forward to learning together.
Projects by fanatics, for fanatics
Get answers and advice for everyone wanting to learn the art of audio.
Join the Community
507,856
Members
7,890,996
Messages

Filter

Forum Statistics

Threads
406,379
Messages
7,890,996
Members
507,856
Latest member
MHLumber