First off, I would like to thank Carlos for the opportunity to try out a pair of the Burson Audio V6 Vivid op-amps. Also, my apologies for taking so long to write this. Nothing in 2020 seems to be going as planned.
I’m using these in a AK4497 based DAC. The board has sockets installed so swapping the op-amps is easy. After nearly 40 years in electronics, I have lots of parts sitting around to play with. Some of the op-amps that I have tried with this DAC have been the 5532, OPA2604, LM4562, OPA1612, MUSES8820 and the MUSES02. They all work fine in this DAC and I could live with any of them. However, of all of them my favorite is the MUSES02 for this application. So, I only compared the V6 to the 02.
When I first heard the V6, I was reminded of the smiley face EQ. Back when graphic EQ’s were popular you would see EQ’s with the bass and treble faders boosted and the mids flat or cut. The V6 seemed to have a U or V shaped EQ to it. The first things to stand out was a strong well defined bass, an extended and detailed upper end with a wide deep and layered sound stage. The mid’s however were missing or covered over by the high end. The extended upper range made things like horns, strings and cymbals a little grating and fatiguing over time. This was not an issue with any of the other op-amps I tried. Around the 80 hour mark, I thought I would try shielding the V6’s just to see if that would help the upper range. That is the second picture with them in a grounded copper foil. I checked the PS and outputs again with the scope. Shielding did not seem to improve anything.
Over the next one hundred hours or so, I switched back to the 02 a few times. Each time listening to the V6 was like being at a clear bright sunny beach. Switching to the 02 was like being at that same beach but with a good pair of sun glasses. With the glare and brightness gone, all the subtle details reappeared. The little breaths of a horn player or fingers moving on strings were back. Listening with the 02 was more relaxed and musical. The V6 was more on the analytical and cool side. Also, while the V6 has a large deep sound stage with a musicians in the room sound. The 02 has a huge 3D holographic sound stage that puts the listener in the room with the musicians. The V6 and 02 seem to be complete opposites in their sound. Kind of Yin and Yang.
I normally do not expect a change in op-amp sound after a few hours of warm up. However, around the 140 hour mark, something changed with the V6’s. The upper range mellowed considerably and the mid-range showed up. The FR seemed a lot flatter. With about 250 hours on them now, they are easier on the ears. The up right bass sounds fantastic, the mid’s are present with a slight warmth and horns, etc. on the upper end don’t have me reaching for the skip button. Also, the subtle details in the mid’s are there now. There is still a bit of glare and edge to the upper range. This can be an issue with some recordings or long listening sessions.
In the end I would say the V6 Vivid is a great op-amp in the right system. I have an older headphone amp that leans a little too dark. I plan on trying the V6 Vivid in that unit when time permits. I have a feeling that the V6 Vivid’s detailed and analytical nature will work well in the studio for checking final mixes, etc.
Thanks again Carlos.