Mark Levinson 33H
- By montana
- Solid State
- 44 Replies
Hi friends
I am trying to understand something
I have looked over the schematic of the mark levinson 33H the base resistors consists of thick film (matal glaze) TF-20 resistors rated at 1W
What was the thinking of the designer since when it comes to resistor noise thick film are worse than thin film and off course wirewound resistor.
The only thing that film resistors are superior are rise time and higher bandwidth.
But since we have Ayrton-Perry wirewound wich has high bandwidth and rise time close to film resistors...
Still why the use of thick film instead of wirewound? since the 33H should be statement amplifier cost no object.
Do anyone use vishay mills or other Ayrton-Perry resistor in the signal path and can give me his opinion???
God bless you all
Nehoray
I am trying to understand something
I have looked over the schematic of the mark levinson 33H the base resistors consists of thick film (matal glaze) TF-20 resistors rated at 1W
What was the thinking of the designer since when it comes to resistor noise thick film are worse than thin film and off course wirewound resistor.
The only thing that film resistors are superior are rise time and higher bandwidth.
But since we have Ayrton-Perry wirewound wich has high bandwidth and rise time close to film resistors...
Still why the use of thick film instead of wirewound? since the 33H should be statement amplifier cost no object.
Do anyone use vishay mills or other Ayrton-Perry resistor in the signal path and can give me his opinion???
God bless you all
Nehoray