Slewmaster - CFA vs. VFA "Rumble"

trimmer range ....

With the values on the posted Schema , (below) is the VAS current range.

With your (1K trimmers) .... your range should be 2-8ma VAS current (or more)
with 1K R13/16 !! That is why I added them - no other values need to be
changed with such a range on the CCS's !
PS - also with the trimmers .... read the servo output voltage , by setting one
a little different from the other ... the servo voltage will drop (<1V) , as it is not
compensating for as much of a input pair imbalance.
OS
 

Attachments

  • trimmer.jpg
    trimmer.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 678
Last edited:
With the values on the posted Schema , (below) is the VAS current range.

With your (1K trimmers) .... your range should be 2-8ma VAS current (or more)
with 1K R13/16 !! That is why I added them - no other values need to be
changed with such a range on the CCS's !
PS - also with the trimmers .... read the servo output voltage , by setting one
a little different from the other ... the servo voltage will drop (<1V) , as it is not
compensating for as much of a input pair imbalance.
OS
Ok OS problem has already been solved.Sorry for this.
Here is shematic with measurments
 

Attachments

  • gnome final.jpg
    gnome final.jpg
    616.3 KB · Views: 695
Ok OS problem has already been solved.Sorry for this.
Here is shematic with measurments
I see you have 1.266V
at servo output ... like I said , try to manually offset one of the IP pair CSS's
to see if you can reduce the servo voltage.

The servo correction voltage is the "window" to see what kind of input
pair imbalance pre-exists. Trimmer tweaks can reduce this. The gnome is
the best of the current DIYA CFA's as far as "fine tuning" the IP stage.
(servo + trimmers) 😎
 
I see you have 1.266V
at servo output ... like I said , try to manually offset one of the IP pair CSS's
to see if you can reduce the servo voltage.

The servo correction voltage is the "window" to see what kind of input
pair imbalance pre-exists. Trimmer tweaks can reduce this. The gnome is
the best of the current DIYA CFA's as far as "fine tuning" the IP stage.
(servo + trimmers) 😎
Ok OS, i can try this tomorrow morning.
keep in mind please that i have matched nothing!😉
I must mention that from a quick test, i see that some instability appears . Square wave test
 
Last edited:
Almost ready for moving electrons...

A few pics to show an almost fully completed board.

One question OS, connecting G2 points - what is your vision for that? A wire under the board perhaps?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1156.JPG
    IMG_1156.JPG
    485.5 KB · Views: 422
  • IMG_1155.JPG
    IMG_1155.JPG
    434.4 KB · Views: 443
  • IMG_1154.JPG
    IMG_1154.JPG
    404.8 KB · Views: 450
  • IMG_1153.JPG
    IMG_1153.JPG
    547.8 KB · Views: 607
A few pics to show an almost fully completed board.

One question OS, connecting G2 points - what is your vision for that? A wire under the board perhaps?

That is the Real THING ... MAN ! 😱

G2 is meant for under the board. A couple dabs of glue to keep it over
near one of the rails. It is the "clean ground".

PS - more exactly (anally) , follow the negative decoupling trace back
to G2. No massive currents there , like near the OP trace(s) or main inductor .

OS
 
Ok OS, i can try this tomorrow morning.
keep in mind please that i have matched nothing!😉
I must mention that from a quick test, i see that some instability appears . Square wave test

I am 😱😱 , "If it's not broke , don't fix it ! "

(below 1) is the "fix" ...

Too low of a value for R13/16 and R7/8 reduced phase margin just enough
to create overshoot. Lower current feedback resistor values also help (1.5k/56K for R18/17).
Increasing Hawksford LED current closer to the V1.2 (R22-47K) is also best , trimmers can be re-adjusted for optimum 4.5-5ma VAS I.

Resulting CLG bode is nearly the V1.2 (below 2).
PS- the servo change had no effect (ran the same inverting or non inv.).

ALL MY FAULT. 🙁 Sorry !

Edit R21/23 (VAS shunt) can be 220-330K , resulting in 52 -48db LF gain.
OS
 

Attachments

  • gnomeschemaupdate.jpg
    gnomeschemaupdate.jpg
    141.7 KB · Views: 687
  • ideal gnome.jpg
    ideal gnome.jpg
    66.7 KB · Views: 653
Last edited:
The film caps you used instead of 22u lytics will resonate madly. I suggest that anyone should build it with the lytics first, listen to it that way, then ADD film decoupling across the lytics. You need the lytics to provide some damping; the larger the film cap, the larger the lytic should be.
 
Measurments after updates.
The instability remain.
Amplifier oscillates after clipping also, (sinusoidal wave test)
I measure 2mv A.C on out even when input is sorted but can't hear any noise from speaker.
 

Attachments

  • gnome upd.jpg
    gnome upd.jpg
    451.1 KB · Views: 580
  • 100_0532.JPG
    100_0532.JPG
    414.1 KB · Views: 547
  • 100_0533.JPG
    100_0533.JPG
    438 KB · Views: 265
Last edited: