LuDEF

Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
one channel is having LU laying on its back on top of heatsink/L bracket, observing Clouds and Sunshine, in chatting company of two mosfets, each having funny glass with little umbrella in it

other channel Lu is having it's back on underside of heatsink/L bracket, seeing just bottom of case; mosfets are in same position as those of other heatsink, chatting, umbrella glass etc.
he tried having glass (if chatting is not possible) but bubblie can't stay in, you know - gravity

:)
 
Member
Joined 2019
Paid Member
Build finished

Ordinary build using 4U case. Bias current is rock solid. From cold start, it needs almost 2 minutes to reach steady state. After several hours, it will change less than 30 mA.
Offset voltage starts from -60 mV, then during Iq rise, briefly reaches +270 mV and then falls down reaching steady state of +- 10 mV. It does not change more than 20 mV range.
Heatsink temperatures at supply of +- 25 V and Iq 1.5 A are below 40 C.

Nothing left to desire.

I started measurements with output noise. Unweighted output noise in 22 Hz to 22 kHz bandwidth is 25 uV. That is among best of all FW amplifiers.
Noise is at -110 dB relative to signal level of 1 V rms, so even with super sensitive loudspeakers in quiet room, it won’t be an issue.
 

Attachments

  • LuDEF_top.jpg
    LuDEF_top.jpg
    475.4 KB · Views: 235
  • LuDEF_side.jpg
    LuDEF_side.jpg
    449.6 KB · Views: 243
  • Noise unweighted.png
    Noise unweighted.png
    54.2 KB · Views: 248
  • Nose level dB.png
    Nose level dB.png
    51.4 KB · Views: 247
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
Are the new super drek boards available for the greedy boyz yet?

soon, just to get them
in fact, I can/will send small Lu pcbs with "old" ones too

Although, it was connected the wrong way, there was no damage. Iq was 0.5 A and there was no reaction to adjusting trimpots. So, no big issue if anyone else makes the same mistake.

Soldered new pins and bended them in X fashion, and all is well.

:cheers:
 
Member
Joined 2019
Paid Member
Another interesting observation

DEF amplifiers have unbalanced AC current in positive and negative rails. Ratio is roughly 1:2.7

IIRC with Sissy SIT, current was higher at negative rail. Here is the opposite. It is higher at the positive rail. Could this be the reason for the very low THD, as there is distortion cancelation in play?
 
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
long time ago, for DEFiSIT, I wrote that SIT is acting as error correction for mosfet ...... and I was just partially joking

same applies for any OS having dissimilar parts in output, but antiphase currents are case just with SIT and Schade

all other ones I made recently are working in so-so normal PP action

edit: ratio of currents depends of dissimilarity of used parts, practically ratio of their transconductances, so different for each of recent amps

it can be altered by wish, simply using different part where possible ....... I mean - it'll be sacrilege spoiling in any other way ( introducing source resistors) pure Square Law transfer of OS

say - in case where we have IRFP240 present, we can use IRFP150

or , down - we can use IRFP9140, 9240, or FQ or 2SJ

damn, all roads are leading to Wakootalians

:clown:
 
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2019
Paid Member
you can increase them (gate stoppers) without fuss to 220R

one thing - to be sure that LU itself is not behaving badly, only way is to replace it, or to switch them (LU) between channels

if problem goes with LU, that's it
if problem stays with pcb, well, it's rest of circuit

Increased to 200R on 9140 and Iq/Vds were stable when hot, but offset kept drifting.

Put a 100R on the board in series with the SM 100R on the LU and startup went as normal, then the offset took off and went up to 1+V and I shut it down.

Will order some SM 220Rs and be ready to replace the LU I guess.
 
Member
Joined 2019
Paid Member
I made distortion measurements as confirmation that no mistakes were made during assembly and following events with one LU connected the wrong way.

Distortion at all power levels is slightly better than posted at the beginning of this thread. That is reasonably to expect for all builds, as ZM is measuring on his breadboard (T-bed) where conditions (PS, wiring) are not optimal. I’ve attached simpler version (H2 and H3 only) of distortion vs. frequency for both channels.

From graph, we can also determine that – 3 dB FR is at 40 kHz.
 

Attachments

  • Distortion_1kHz_1W_8Ω.png
    Distortion_1kHz_1W_8Ω.png
    60.6 KB · Views: 234
  • R_cahnnel_sweep.png
    R_cahnnel_sweep.png
    47.5 KB · Views: 219
  • L_cahnnel_sweep.png
    L_cahnnel_sweep.png
    47.2 KB · Views: 224