SissySIT

Cinemag CMOQ 4LPC is quadrifillar (as confirmed by guys from factory) wound thingie , each winding having 27Rdc and 1.5H (measured by your truly )

Difference between Cinemags - CMOQ-4LPC vs. CMOQ-4HPC
If the left and right have this same value they are identical.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190408_204842.thumb.jpg.0cef69a68f4b4521945d9a42049c870c.jpg
    IMG_20190408_204842.thumb.jpg.0cef69a68f4b4521945d9a42049c870c.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 735
Member
Joined 2016
Paid Member
Following the recent thread by XRK971 about using REW for distortion measurements here (https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/sol...-distortion-measurements-rew.html#post5806493), and making use of the opportunity that today is a holiday in our part of Germany, I did some quick measurements of my SissySIT using REW and my Focusrite 2i2.



With the amp cold, you see a clear dominance of the 2nd harmonic, and an extraordinarily low noise floor:


attachment.php


With the amp warmed up, there is really not much difference - minimally lower distortion, minimally higher noise (probably caused by the higher bias current when warm). Note the phase of the second harmonic - 86 degrees, does this mean positive phase second harmonic ?



attachment.php


The left channel is a bit noisier (still nothing to hear with my ear in the Fostex widebanders of my 100 dB/W Jericho Horns), but otherwise superbly matched in level and distortion profile:


attachment.php


I also did a frequency sweep for both channels. For all measurements, the output of the amp was 2.58V, so a bit less than 1W over the 8.2 Ohm dummy resistors. That was the maximum level at the current setting of the Focusrite 2i2, which had been optimized for lowest noise and distortion in loopback calibrating. Could get out a bit higher level, but for "real power" I would have to add a preamp.

Anyway, here are the sweeps, first right channel:



attachment.php


And the left:


attachment.php


Again, I think it shows the very good matching of the two channels. Also, the lowest frequency of the sweep is 16 Hz. You see the rise of the 3rd harmonic towards the low frequencies because of the transformer used in the SissySIT, but I think the CMOQ-4HPC do show very good distortion characteristics towards low frequencies. (It was no really high input voltage, though - 0.707 V).



I found these measurements interesting :).

And REW is easier to use for this (following XRK971's ver good intro to using it) than ARTA, which I had used before.



Best regards, Claas
 

Attachments

  • SissySIT right cold 2573 mV -6 dB atten.png
    SissySIT right cold 2573 mV -6 dB atten.png
    86.1 KB · Views: 5,464
  • SissySIT right 190530 warm.png
    SissySIT right 190530 warm.png
    89 KB · Views: 787
  • SissySIT left warm 190530 2130.png
    SissySIT left warm 190530 2130.png
    90.6 KB · Views: 777
  • SissySIT left step warm 190530 2130.png
    SissySIT left step warm 190530 2130.png
    67.6 KB · Views: 781
  • SissySIT right step 190530 2110 b.png
    SissySIT right step 190530 2110 b.png
    64.7 KB · Views: 5,863
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
well done

it pretty much complies with my own measurements (even if sloppier setup) using ARTA and EMU1212 , later confirmed with my friend's measurements , using AP One setup

really lost in all files , I believe I posted those with AP somewhere

so , it is confirmed , Sissy is working well all around the Globe

:rofl:

(though Germany and Serbia were never too far , someone always breathing to other one's neck :rofl: )
 
X/Chede,
Wonderful graphs. This instrument is laying bare the way tubes present sound to the listener. Actually, -55dB H2 for a 12AU7 is very good, the reflection of very high plate resistor. Most guitar amps tend to load down their plates; typically about 2.3-3 times the intrinsic plate impedance. For a 12AU7, that is 15k.
Really good work, thank you!
HD
 
Again, I think it shows the very good matching of the two channels. Also, the lowest frequency of the sweep is 16 Hz. You see the rise of the 3rd harmonic towards the low frequencies because of the transformer used in the SissySIT, but I think the CMOQ-4HPC do show very good distortion characteristics towards low frequencies.

Whether this is measured with or without the optional Borbely WCF ?
 
Power Supply Question

ZM,

In your build, I see a full wave bridge rectifier on each secondary winding of the transformer and the common ground is formed between the power supply caps.

I see this is following the F5 schematic by NP.

I also see that the F5 Turbo (also by NP) uses a full wave bridge rectifier across both secondary windings with the transformer's center two leads going to ground between the power supply caps.

I will post both for comparison.

I am wondering what is preferred and why?

I'm building this amp as we speak. Stuffed boards, back panel completed, laying out bottom plate with power supply.

As you can see I have repurposed a 12 channel Sonamp 1250.

Rush
 

Attachments

  • F5 CL60.png
    F5 CL60.png
    317.7 KB · Views: 196
  • F5 TURBO CL30.png
    F5 TURBO CL30.png
    155.3 KB · Views: 192
  • IMG_1453.jpg
    IMG_1453.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 183
  • IMG_1454.jpg
    IMG_1454.jpg
    92.4 KB · Views: 193
Last edited: