While they last...

@ Diyers

Ok at 1 Watt get nice distortion 2 harmonic profile many amp's can show similar figures
but at 20 or 50 Watts distortion rise super fast and % is much higher with Tokin's.
Again maybe from J Broskie article or from MEPER post # While they last...
Sakuma style solution..or new Mr. Pass ?
Can be interesting to learn and experiment.
Use LTSpice first so no danger of smell the smoke
 
Mu follower common drain THF-51S at onset of clipping (50W into 8 Ohm), left and right channels. Two percent THD is quite good and probably no worse than VFETs, except VFET can't output 50W.

20W added.
 

Attachments

  • KP926B THF-51S Mu Follower L Ch Max Out 20.0Vrms Onset Clipping.jpg
    KP926B THF-51S Mu Follower L Ch Max Out 20.0Vrms Onset Clipping.jpg
    156.4 KB · Views: 554
  • KP926B THF-51S Mu Follower R Ch Max Out 20.0Vrms Onset Clipping.jpg
    KP926B THF-51S Mu Follower R Ch Max Out 20.0Vrms Onset Clipping.jpg
    156.2 KB · Views: 540
  • KP926B THF-51S Mu Follower L Ch 8R  20W.jpg
    KP926B THF-51S Mu Follower L Ch 8R 20W.jpg
    147.1 KB · Views: 549
Last edited:
@ Diyers

Ok at 1 Watt get nice distortion 2 harmonic profile many amp's can show similar figures. . .

Use LTSpice first so no danger of smell the smoke

here my experimental set for the source followers
Various feedback, also the famous F6-style feedback.
The transformer is modelled so-so, could be improved
 

Attachments

Hi Ben,

I have similar results. I did increase the bias to 2.6 amps and it increased the 4 ohm power but it didn’t sound better. It also increased the heat dissipation so, I cut it back to 2.2 amps.
 

Attachments

  • FF0D7611-FDD4-4B87-BC60-6450F035FA93.jpeg
    FF0D7611-FDD4-4B87-BC60-6450F035FA93.jpeg
    579.5 KB · Views: 436
  • Like
Reactions: d to the g
here they are
XNJF.asy looks as follows (cant upload the symbol)
Version 4
SymbolType CELL
LINE Normal 16 16 16 80
LINE Normal 48 72 48 96
LINE Normal 16 72 48 72
LINE Normal 48 24 48 0
LINE Normal 16 24 48 24
LINE Normal 0 64 4 64
LINE Normal 4 68 16 64
LINE Normal 4 60 16 64
LINE Normal 4 60 4 68
WINDOW 0 56 32 Left 2
WINDOW 3 56 72 Left 2
SYMATTR Value NJF
SYMATTR Prefix X
SYMATTR Description N-Channel JFET
PIN 48 0 LEFT 5
PINATTR PinName D
PINATTR SpiceOrder 1
PIN 0 64 TOP 5
PINATTR PinName G
PINATTR SpiceOrder 2
PIN 48 96 LEFT 5
PINATTR PinName S
PINATTR SpiceOrder 3

Place it with a text editor where the LTSpice can find it. I have it high on the file structure, but it really should be where other ASY's are.
 

Attachments

@ Ben Mah @ Triode_al @ Diyers

Great thanks for sharing 🙂
Ok so distortion can be at moderate % level.
I guess Diyers with tigh curve traced quads hope use them in special topology amplifier
, even lower distortion (?) , single and balanced inputs and capacitors less in the signal path
 
I have a secret plan to use tight curve-traced quad SITs in a modified F6 amplifier.

Because in the F6 drain load = source load, and because the signal is applied between source and gate, the current swing is equal.
I think you need two tight matched pairs; the two pairs being roughly equal.

A little dissemetry top/bottom is not bad, gives a bit more H2, by having a volt or two difference in Vds, :Ohno: that probably works wonders.

The special F6 feedback is a requirement to get a lower output, but not mandatory because out of the box it might be in the order of 7-10 ohms, much lower than with the IRF240/250's real mosfets. So feedback can be much less.
 
Wow, that will be some project!
I do like my F6 with the FQH44N10 parts, slightly higher voltage rails (+/–26V). Have thought about trying dissimilar Mosfets on top, or bottom, such as IXFK120N20P in the larger TO-264 package. However, I'm still busy with other projects.
Something else to consider if using higher voltage rails: Replace the simple JFet buffer with a HV opamp such as the OPA551. I used a Diamond buffer in mine, but I have really been enjoying the Marauder cards in my lottery VFET amp.
 
Last edited:
I have a secret plan to use tight curve-traced quad SITs in a modified F6 amplifier.

Because in the F6 drain load = source load, and because the signal is applied between source and gate, the current swing is equal.
I think you need two tight matched pairs; the two pairs being roughly equal.

A little dissemetry top/bottom is not bad, gives a bit more H2, by having a volt or two difference in Vds, :Ohno: that probably works wonders.

The special F6 feedback is a requirement to get a lower output, but not mandatory because out of the box it might be in the order of 7-10 ohms, much lower than with the IRF240/250's real mosfets. So feedback can be much less.

Interesting! What kind of sit are you thinking about?
 
Mine shipped mid August 😬 lol maybe that ship sank off the coast of California (jk) >.>

I noticed that there are some more THF-51S left. Maybe I should pick them up for the SissySIT (even tho 182ES would also work), and sell whatever I don't end up using -- including the pair from @pras1170 if they show up for me.

I wonder how different each model operates... I think I recall reading that the audible differences between them (in some circuits) would be rather small. I think the 182ES may have a bit more 2nd order distortion than the 51S, but I'd have to try and look that up again.

I guess it boils down to how many different amps I plan to build... 😉