What's wrong with the kiss, boy?

Thank you ZM, that is illuminating.

just analyze resulting inductance and load which driving stage sees, and there is your answer

I will try and take some measurements and see what I end up with.

each winding is nominally 150R

wakoo xformer logic
Oh no, more reading for me to figure out why this is.... I've never quite understood how transformer primary Z is determined. Sadly the specs for my repeat coil aren't too clear (93A, attached)

Thanks again,
 

Attachments

  • 93A.jpg
    93A.jpg
    283.7 KB · Views: 40
Sort of, not sure how much I trust my cheap LCR meter but here goes.

Coil 1 (Left Channel)
Winding ConnectionInductanceResistance
1-2 (primary, winding #1)0.69H18.8R
5-6 (primary, winding #2)0.65H18.7R
3-4 (secondary, winding #1)0.69H21.5R
7-8 (secondary, winding #2)0.65H21.5R

Connecting as autoformer (2-7):
Winding ConnectionInductanceResistance
2-5 (Full primary, series connection)2.6H37.4R
4-7 (Full secondary, series)2.6H42.9R
4-5 (Across Full primary + Secondary)10.64H80.2R

Coil 2 (Right Channel)
Winding ConnectionInductanceResistance
1-2 (primary, winding #1)0.70H19.8R
5-6 (primary, #2)0.66H21.5R
3-4 (secondary, #1)0.70H18.9R
7-8 (secondary, #2)0.66H23.5R

Connecting as autoformer (2-7):
Winding ConnectionInductanceResistance
2-5 (Full primary, series connection)2.5H37.1R
4-7 (Full secondary, series)2.5H44.5R
4-5 (Across Full primary + Secondary)10.4H80.5R

Sorry for so many figures, definitely take the inductance readings with a grain of salt.

To your point above(? or if I somehow wired things up wrong), it's interesting that measuring across 2 series windings (on each side of the xfmer) doubles the individual readings.

And measuring across both sides (4 windings) quadruples the individual values.

I don't understand transformers at all... More to read and think about!
 
Last edited:
just use them as autoformer - easier load to source (preceding stage)

simple as that - higher the inductance, higher minimal impedance seen by preceding stage

you have pretty much all the tricks in Iron Pre related threads (this one being just beginning)

regarding theory, plenty of info around

in layman terms and as general info (so sorta roughly speaking) impedance and inductance in xformer are going up by square of voltage ratio/number of turns

example - that's why full primary ( two sections in series) is nominally 600 Ohms, while half of it ( just one section) is 150R nominally; double the turns. 4 times impedance etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ranshdow and jt23
just use them as autoformer - easier load to source (preceding stage)

simple as that - higher the inductance, higher minimal impedance seen by preceding stage

you have pretty much all the tricks in Iron Pre related threads (this one being just beginning)
Thank you - I'll look through the tips and tricks thread and see what I find. Hopefully an Iron Pre SE or Iron Turtle (edit Pumpkin) will be in my future before too long as well!

in layman terms and as general info (so sorta roughly speaking) impedance and inductance in xformer are going up by square of voltage ratio/number of turns
For some reason, I never considered that inductance would be the factor that's related to the square of turns ratio. Definitely need to go back and read more carefully. (And thanks for pointing out it's a rough figure).
 
Hi,

I just quickly build the buffer as below with below 0.1mA matched K389+J109, connected to the Cinemag for 12dB.
The DC-offset behind the buffer is arround 9..10mV.
I don't like trimmers, especially not in the signal path, and was thinking how to implement a DC-servo.


Below is a concept (works in LT-spice), to not connect the cinemag primary to the GND, but to the output of a DC-servo (NOT INTEGRATING, so actually a gain 1 buffer with a low pass RC).
It this a silly idea? What can I improve to have as less impact as possible soundwise?
Other options to implement a DC-servo?
 

Attachments

  • 20250421 - Cinemag DC-servo concept.jpg
    20250421 - Cinemag DC-servo concept.jpg
    63.2 KB · Views: 37