The rectangular planar driver has completely different directivity from a circular cone driver, so that may be a factor in how it sounds different.
I based this statement, because, based on my small, directivity study, a rectangular ribbon ALWAYS has a different directivity to a dome tweeter.
I avoid trying to describe how it sounds because describing it is like describing wine or chocolate- unless we can come to an agreement of what we mean, we are just using flowery language to try to convey what we mean...
I based this statement, because, based on my small, directivity study, a rectangular ribbon ALWAYS has a different directivity to a dome tweeter.
I avoid trying to describe how it sounds because describing it is like describing wine or chocolate- unless we can come to an agreement of what we mean, we are just using flowery language to try to convey what we mean...
Last edited:
Try a planar mid some time. It is different. More different than any of the different drivers I have used. Hearing it was like the first time I heard a proper subwoofer in high school. Like an "oh, thats what it should actually sound like" sort of thing.I'm not quite sure how to translate this description into perceived effects.. but knowing that cone drivers are capable of proper reproduction if used properly I can only advise against jumping to conclusions.
I have 😉Try a planar mid some time.
The described audible differences might be attributable to the many circumstantial differences in the system. If configured so all these are accounted for, I would not expect that level of difference.