Mind you that original statement was general
Amazingly you supported that statement
Grammatically fine, syntax fine, physically incorrect, so I must conclude that both committed the same mistake or someone is bluffing.
Working with retarded potentials it is mathematically a bit hard, even worse, statistically you almost never write an equation, and then we must accept your statement as a gospel, so let me write again Lorentz-transformed fields
Where
It results quite obvious that you can find cases with B = 0 or B' = 0, but mind you that they are particular cases, and don't change anything, original statement is still wrong.
University had a subscription to Annalen der Physik and I could read the 1905 original article and I can assure you that Einstein wrote just c, modern theoreticians…🙄
Please, stop to say "lay people" it sounds to me pejorative, all of us we are ignorant in some degree.
Amazingly you supported that statement
Grammatically fine, syntax fine, physically incorrect, so I must conclude that both committed the same mistake or someone is bluffing.
Working with retarded potentials it is mathematically a bit hard, even worse, statistically you almost never write an equation, and then we must accept your statement as a gospel, so let me write again Lorentz-transformed fields
E∥’ = E∥
B∥’ = B∥
E⊥’ = γ [E⊥ + (1/c) v x B]
B⊥’ = γ [B⊥ – (1/c) v x E]
Where
γ = 1/ √(1 – v²/c²)
It results quite obvious that you can find cases with B = 0 or B' = 0, but mind you that they are particular cases, and don't change anything, original statement is still wrong.
University had a subscription to Annalen der Physik and I could read the 1905 original article and I can assure you that Einstein wrote just c, modern theoreticians…🙄
Please, stop to say "lay people" it sounds to me pejorative, all of us we are ignorant in some degree.
Last edited:
I don't believe the word itself is pejorative, its used to distinguish all others from the clergy (men of the cloth).
Hey Richard! 🙂 ...How's things laying off for you? ...Any idea on expansion of the universe? ...Speed of wind inside a vacuum of incessant light?
Last edited:
I think we can safely assume SNR is a real human being. An AI would never be so confused. 😉
Jan
Jan
It is possible you don't understand me, or I am misunderstood by you, either way, I will do what I can to help.
Not a good assumption. A Turing device will "learn" from its inputs. Confused inputs, confused-sounding outputs.
Well, to be fair, you're not learning from any of his inputs either.
Wait, does that mean you're human too? 😛
Arrgggh! I'm exposed! 😡
Although, to be honest, I'd been hard pressed to acknowledge that I 'learned' that c is time (expressed in seconds - I guess, now I'm not sure of anything anymore) and not, what I have always thought, a speed expressed in distance/time.
Maybe I am in the wrong universe.
Jan
Although, to be honest, I'd been hard pressed to acknowledge that I 'learned' that c is time (expressed in seconds - I guess, now I'm not sure of anything anymore) and not, what I have always thought, a speed expressed in distance/time.
Maybe I am in the wrong universe.
Jan
Last edited:
@popilin
You mentioned the Casimir effect a while back, yes it has been experimentally verified but I thought it was due to quantum fields. I'm not sure everyone's idea of there being "something" in a vacuum includes all fields. Any vacuum we create on earth will have local fields due to terrestrial communications, the earth's magnetic/electric field, etc.
Even more interesting in the current context are the slow light experiments, with Bose-Einstein condensates and other things. No gravitational lensing necessary to observe light traveling at a tiny fraction of c.
You mentioned the Casimir effect a while back, yes it has been experimentally verified but I thought it was due to quantum fields. I'm not sure everyone's idea of there being "something" in a vacuum includes all fields. Any vacuum we create on earth will have local fields due to terrestrial communications, the earth's magnetic/electric field, etc.
Even more interesting in the current context are the slow light experiments, with Bose-Einstein condensates and other things. No gravitational lensing necessary to observe light traveling at a tiny fraction of c.
Last edited:
Child's play, This is what we got...
How to Make a Fire Volcano (Mr. Wizard) - YouTube
Me, I asked my father to bring a can of powdered aluminum from the lab to mix with my polishing rouge. Some magnesium shavings helped to start the fun. I still wonder how I figured this stuff out at 15 without the web.
Last edited:
No just had a large well equiped lab supply, he actually analyzed pelletized ore mixes for HUGE castings like big Alice. I got to see it once, casting sand pits the size of basketball courts and the massive crucibles the size of a house, this American industry is gone.
Big Allis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A friend of mine is a millwright who installs big turbines in power plants, mostly in northern Ontario and Quebec. I don't know where the turbines are made though.
I think you'll have the better chance. The Dutch started strong by whipping the Spanish, but each round it got harder and harder. I think it's the end of the road for us.
Jan
Jan
I watched the penalty shoot out, close call and an amazing amount of scoreless play ahead of it.
Yeah many top level games end with no goals. That's one of the less attractive things in top soccer.
Throughout the years there have been proposals to adjust the rules so the score chances increase, but so far no joy.
jan
Throughout the years there have been proposals to adjust the rules so the score chances increase, but so far no joy.
jan
- Status
- Not open for further replies.