Transmission Line with 4 Drivers

That Bose (supposedly) TL is nothin more than a TH or BP6S.
I thought TL are nothing more than flared port BR's.

This...

View attachment 1158473

is the same thing as this...

View attachment 1158474

The Bose enclosure just has more drivers.
Sim individual driver positions and contemplate the response shape that would result from somehow combining them or ?
That Bose (supposedly) TL is nothin more than a TH or BP6S.
I thought TL are nothing more than flared port BR's.

This...

View attachment 1158473

is the same thing as this...

View attachment 1158474

The Bose enclosure just has more drivers.
1679964680226.png

1679964736396.png

1679964785225.png

1679964828469.png

1679964870615.png

1679964923929.png

1679964978867.png

i always found this interesting, and then wondered what the combined result(not the individual variety of simmed positions) would acually be ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BP1Fanatic
A 0.5 alignment may yet be the way I go.
Probably not the right terminology on my part, just basic concept
of dedicating drivers to a certain bandwidth like many other speaker designs

The question was how to fit 4x drivers in a TL

The approach is 2x drivers in the line. dedicated to a certain bandwidth.
like any other design which makes up for loses to full space in the bass region.

2 way design in other words, crossover for bass

Most bass amps have EQ and that has been the solution to full space loses.
A player just adds boost or gooses the low end.
So a more " efficient" design actually has same loses if not more.
Max SPL is reduced from boosting bass. Distortion is reached faster.

likewise the " wide bandwidth" speakers potential is EQ'ed out.
Ever so classic...Mid cut, bass boost.

Instead of cutting what it is good at and boosting what it cant do.

The design changes, more drivers dedicated to bass or fullspace loses
less drivers to higher bandwith. In the end same SPL
Traditional EQ not the fix anymore.

in the end less distortion, less dominance from EQ to fix the classic
stage amp scenario. no need to cut what it can do, and boost what it
can not do. On paper a more " efficient" system isn't from the traditional
approach.
 
Sim individual driver positions and contemplate the response shape that would result from somehow combining them or ?

View attachment 1158554
View attachment 1158556
View attachment 1158557
View attachment 1158558
View attachment 1158559
View attachment 1158560
View attachment 1158561
i always found this interesting, and then wondered what the combined result(not the individual variety of simmed positions) would acually be ?
You didn't mix the variations...LOL!

L12 = 10cm.
L23 = 90cm.
L34 = 80cm.
L45 = 20cm.

Or

L12 = 60cm.
L23 = 40cm.
L34 = 70cm.
L45 = 30cm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Booger weldz
Either way good reminder,
How glorious and fascinating transmission lines are to design.
The intriguing rabbit hole.

Then again good visual reminder of the roller coaster
frequency response and roller coaster impedance curve.
When you start to model live audio drivers.

4x10 in 200 liters
2x15 in 200 liters
1x18 in 200 liters

= same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Booger weldz
So what causes the saggy middle in the above sims ? tHe lack of a resonance in the system, except at the ends of the BW…. but the closer drivers together then the ‘more’ the cancel that sound increasingly (if that makes sense?) ?

I dunno how to explain it 🙈