The SIT-3X Amplifier

Attachments

  • old-man-black-hole.jpg
    old-man-black-hole.jpg
    76.8 KB · Views: 450
  • looney-tunes-hole.jpg
    looney-tunes-hole.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 443
Operating a push pull pair partly in push push (or pull pull I suppose) is very inefficient, worse than single ended class A. Also, as you say, this does not correspond to the lowest distortion either so there must be a very compelling reason to employ it. What am I missing?

Wacko -voodoo ...


And, yes, with the P6 pot A=1 that is the behavior of the SIT3X, but the distortion is much higher than when operating in the "normal" push-pull region. The harmonic falloff rate is about the same at -15dB per harmonic.
 
Today I have been looking at the H2 behavior of the folded cascode front end (FCFE). This project turned into two circuit development projects instead of only one for the output stage, because of the need (or desire) for a non-feedback, low output impedance front end. Additionally, in order to obtain negative H2 phase for my chosen region of operation of output stage, it was necessary to have an inverting front end and reversed speaker connections to the output. That is how I ended up choosing the folded cascode topology.

Until today I did not realize how difficult it is to adjust the 2nd harmonoic (H2) of the folded cascode. I have played around with at least 2 approaches, both in simulation and the actual build, and discovered that the relative JFET Idss is about the only parameter that have much affect on H2 without causing a big shift in the DC offset of FEOut. In the case of my right channel FCFE build, I can minimize H2 with an output offset of about 4 volts. That might actually be acceptable, but increasing Idss of the J74 JFET or reducing the Idss of the K170 JFET would reduce that offset.

The front end design has been a learning experience for me.
 
Am about ready to order revised versions of the SIT3X FCFE and OS PCBs. I have made revisions that look to be compatible with installing in a chassis with suitably large heatsinks, such as the diyAudio 5U chassis with 400mm depth. The image below shows right CH heatsink, top-view, and left CH heatsink.


I need to get an idea of how many are interested in purchasing the boards. The first run of 4 each boards will cost me about $360, but will also produce Gerber files that can be used by a lower cost PCB fab facility. The cost will depend on the vender and the quantity ordered.
 

Attachments

  • SIT3X-5U-400mm-complete-left-right-bottom-1b.pcb.jpg
    SIT3X-5U-400mm-complete-left-right-bottom-1b.pcb.jpg
    445.7 KB · Views: 408
I have designed a new power supply capacitor board for the SIT3X (and other amplifiers). The board is to be fabricated for a stereo pair of channels, but can be cut in half into two separate boards.

The board was lair out using ExpressPCB, but the cost of fabricating it by them would be excessive. I am looking for a volunteer to convert my layout using a design program to can export Gerber files. The layout is shown below, in 3 images:


  • Both sides
  • Top side
  • Bottom side
 

Attachments

  • cap-only-board-pair-2b1.pcb.jpg
    cap-only-board-pair-2b1.pcb.jpg
    526.7 KB · Views: 403
  • cap-only-board-pair-2b1-top.pcb.jpg
    cap-only-board-pair-2b1-top.pcb.jpg
    515.9 KB · Views: 397
  • cap-only-board-pair-2b1-bot.pcb.jpg
    cap-only-board-pair-2b1-bot.pcb.jpg
    483.2 KB · Views: 391