As I just released the DDDAC1794MK3 series (Dac and PSU) I thought it might be a good idea to set up a support thread for technical and background question, discussion and support.
The release post is here: http://blog.dddac.com/the-new-dddac1794mk3-dac-and-psu/
For those already interested in the construction and installation manuals:
DAC: http://blog.dddac.com/wp-content/up...tion-DDDAC1794MK3-DAC-Version-2.6-rev-1.4.pdf
PSU: http://blog.dddac.com/wp-content/up...ction-DDDAC1794MK3-PSU-Version-2.5-rev1.4.pdf
I am not a great photographer, nor do I have a product photobooth, so here is a somewhat lousy picture of my test set-up:
looking forward to some good discussions 🙂
Doede
http://blog.dddac.com/
The release post is here: http://blog.dddac.com/the-new-dddac1794mk3-dac-and-psu/
For those already interested in the construction and installation manuals:
DAC: http://blog.dddac.com/wp-content/up...tion-DDDAC1794MK3-DAC-Version-2.6-rev-1.4.pdf
PSU: http://blog.dddac.com/wp-content/up...ction-DDDAC1794MK3-PSU-Version-2.5-rev1.4.pdf
I am not a great photographer, nor do I have a product photobooth, so here is a somewhat lousy picture of my test set-up:
- Power transformer 2x12 Vac
- double DDDAC PSU
- two AE Chokes (my specs: Amorphe 1H 4 Ohm)
- DAC Board DDDAC1794MK3
- Sowter Output Transformers
looking forward to some good discussions 🙂
Doede
http://blog.dddac.com/
Last edited:
Good stuff!
Your blog post says "Two channels can be paralleled again for one channel ... Further paralleling of boards possible." I don't quite understand this. How many DAC chips can we run in parallel with the new DDDAC? 4? 8? More?
Your blog post says "Two channels can be paralleled again for one channel ... Further paralleling of boards possible." I don't quite understand this. How many DAC chips can we run in parallel with the new DDDAC? 4? 8? More?
I think you have a point, it is not very clear. I will rework this text…
ok try again
each board has two channels with each 2 chips - so you can make stereo with each channel having 2 chips in parallel. like old two deck
each board can de assigned to only R or L signal and also have both channels of the board paralleled. Resulting in one board with mono L or R and 4. chips in parallel. if you use two boards, one as L and one as R in mono mode you will have stereo again with each L and R 4 chips in parallel. Like the old 4 deck.
hope I did not make it more complex. 🤔 May be I should make a schematic drawing showing these two options
ok try again
each board has two channels with each 2 chips - so you can make stereo with each channel having 2 chips in parallel. like old two deck
each board can de assigned to only R or L signal and also have both channels of the board paralleled. Resulting in one board with mono L or R and 4. chips in parallel. if you use two boards, one as L and one as R in mono mode you will have stereo again with each L and R 4 chips in parallel. Like the old 4 deck.
hope I did not make it more complex. 🤔 May be I should make a schematic drawing showing these two options
Ok, that's just what I thought. In the blog post maybe just remove the additional bullet point saying that "further paralleling is possible", because it seems it's actually not possible. 4 chips per channel is the max.
I would have preferred more chips in parallel (8 or even 16), but I guess you had your reasons to max out at 4.
I would have preferred more chips in parallel (8 or even 16), but I guess you had your reasons to max out at 4.
Well, it is in fact possible, you can daisy chain more boards and parallel the outputs. If this is useful is unknown, as I did not test it sound wise.
i also recommended for the previous version to stop at 4 decks. Very few went beyond that because they just were intrigued and tried it. It does improve, but is it worth the extra cost ? I think no, but some went for “cost no object” 😎 after all it is a hobby….
i also recommended for the previous version to stop at 4 decks. Very few went beyond that because they just were intrigued and tried it. It does improve, but is it worth the extra cost ? I think no, but some went for “cost no object” 😎 after all it is a hobby….
On a separate note. I know my blog site has no safety certificate yet. I am working on this. My hoster Is restrictive in my current subscription and I need to move all of my database etc. I am planning to do this somewhere in may… rest assure my blog is a safe space 🙂
here is a diagram for options for stereo use (my blog post is alo updated)
sure, here you go....
If the output voltage is too high for your likings, swap orange and brown at the secondary side....
If the output voltage is too high for your likings, swap orange and brown at the secondary side....
One more question for my understanding:sure, here you go....
If the output voltage is too high for your likings, swap orange and brown at the secondary side....
common -> GND of dac board
nc -> Not Connected ?
Correct!One more question for my understanding:
common -> GND of dac board
nc -> Not Connected ?
- Home
- Vendor's Bazaar
- The new DDDAC1794MK3 (DAC and PSU) - Technical and support thread