ostripper said:
I didn't mean to point out a problem , but I don't want to be
a contributer to burning amps .![]()
![]()
I've tried both including or omitting the diamond current
stage in the NFB loop with little effect other than ,with the
isolated current stage, no change with load. (As you pointed out.)
Another interesting note is that by degenerating the darlington
(470r - 2.2k) like a standard EF type 2, "tames" a little
bump at 5MHz (I think that is where this thing "likes" to oscillate)
and sets the phase margin.
I already did the carlos thing and nofire , so I know it works. I tested what would happen if my vbias died and it
is the safest I could imagine.. just 300ma (severely overbiased).
Idiot proof, much better than a typical amp. A total short at
the output would just burn the basestopper resistors.😎
It seems DIYaudio has gone "krill crazy" these days, even
carlos (no trashbin or buckshot) likes it, 3 seperate diamond
topology threads... you started it all ,steve, thanks!
BTW..., yours(krill) is most like the Nakamitchi 620, except they use an EF'ed diamond which is the thermal compensation .
(attached)
OS
Anything that contributes to the stability of the amp is welcome. I certainly have no issue with you pointing it out.
I haven't seen the bump at 5 Meg in the open loop design.
Audio Research placed the input pair on the hear sink for compensation in the solid state amps they released in the mid 70s.
I am glade I stirred up a little interest. I really appreciate the reception my design has received here.
Hi.
Ostripper, have you come across Andy_C's models for the 2SC4793/A1837 devices? Andy hasn't seemed to put these up on his site yet so here they are. Also there's a link to his MJL spice models.
For anyone who hasn't gotten them yet.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1656283#post1656283
http://andycpublic.50webs.com/spice_models_1.htm
- keantoken
Ostripper, have you come across Andy_C's models for the 2SC4793/A1837 devices? Andy hasn't seemed to put these up on his site yet so here they are. Also there's a link to his MJL spice models.
For anyone who hasn't gotten them yet.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1656283#post1656283
http://andycpublic.50webs.com/spice_models_1.htm
- keantoken
Also, While I was looking at your schematic in post 699 I though of the Baker clamp.
http://home.mira.net/~gnb/audio/bakerclamp.html
Not exactly similar, but interesting.
- keantoken
http://home.mira.net/~gnb/audio/bakerclamp.html
Not exactly similar, but interesting.
- keantoken
Thank you for the baker clamp link , I sucked the articles into
my pdF creator and cropped them so they will read nice.😀
I went to the Knoxville TN. Eagles concert and listened to 24
QSC 1KW amps. At first they sounded strained , later in
the show I saw the engineer "fiddling" with the board and
the sound became more to my liking.
Compared to my last concert , RUSH , in 1985 - albany, N.Y.,
with Altec lansings and 4.1 surround at 50KW+ ,the eagles
sound system "blew chunks". The performance was good,
considering the age of Henley and Walsh.
Dang ticket cost a fortune for a 3.5 hour show.(see below)
OS
my pdF creator and cropped them so they will read nice.😀
I went to the Knoxville TN. Eagles concert and listened to 24
QSC 1KW amps. At first they sounded strained , later in
the show I saw the engineer "fiddling" with the board and
the sound became more to my liking.
Compared to my last concert , RUSH , in 1985 - albany, N.Y.,
with Altec lansings and 4.1 surround at 50KW+ ,the eagles
sound system "blew chunks". The performance was good,
considering the age of Henley and Walsh.
Dang ticket cost a fortune for a 3.5 hour show.(see below)
OS
Attachments
Os If you get a chance I would recommend catching a Leonard Cohen concert - excellent value for money by superb musicians - memorable experience. Don't know what sound system was used but the sound was intimate in an open air venue which says a lot for the sound engineers.
Your amp has me intrigued - is the magic in the input stage or the whole circuit. I'm interested in an output stage only which my tube based input stage will feed.
You are using global feedback which I would lose so would there be much advantage to yours Vs the Krill output stage?
Your amp has me intrigued - is the magic in the input stage or the whole circuit. I'm interested in an output stage only which my tube based input stage will feed.
You are using global feedback which I would lose so would there be much advantage to yours Vs the Krill output stage?
is the magic in the input stage or the whole circuit
No magic, but the cfp inPut stage and holman (apt) based
front end is the best as compared to a standard topology.
The krill /nakamitchi diamond OPS has slightly better
distortion figures with global feedback but as Steve pointed
out it would go "open loop" if it burned out ,also NFB would be affected BY differences of loading on the output.
The sound of the diamond seems to be the same either
way as I have tried it.
The whole circuit is one of the best I've done both simulated
or prototyped. Only basic matching is desirable for the
diamond itself (ksa1381/ksc3503).
os
Hi OS,
Looks good on the sim to me 😀
A few points though...
1) MPSA42/92 ? They're a bit slow, only 50MHz fT. OnSemi also do the MPSW42/92 which are extended TO-92 packages that do 1W - might be better.
2) For Q11/Q12 - check out the dissipation on them, hardly any. I switched to KSA992/KSC1845 here.
3) The R-C-R filter in the current source for the LTP produces a hell of a turnon thump by the look of it - the output goes nearly full +VE rail until the current source turns on. I nicked an idea from the Cambridge A3i amp on this score.
There is also quite a difference on the sim between taking feedback from the output, and feedback from the VAS - it's a lot worse from the VAS, with a lot higher THD figure and much more prominent H2/H3/H4. I'm debating trying the "split feedback" system that's in the Leach Amp.
Looks good on the sim to me 😀
A few points though...
1) MPSA42/92 ? They're a bit slow, only 50MHz fT. OnSemi also do the MPSW42/92 which are extended TO-92 packages that do 1W - might be better.
2) For Q11/Q12 - check out the dissipation on them, hardly any. I switched to KSA992/KSC1845 here.
3) The R-C-R filter in the current source for the LTP produces a hell of a turnon thump by the look of it - the output goes nearly full +VE rail until the current source turns on. I nicked an idea from the Cambridge A3i amp on this score.
There is also quite a difference on the sim between taking feedback from the output, and feedback from the VAS - it's a lot worse from the VAS, with a lot higher THD figure and much more prominent H2/H3/H4. I'm debating trying the "split feedback" system that's in the Leach Amp.
Attachments
which components achieve the quiet turn on?jaycee said:3) The R-C-R filter in the current source for the LTP produces a hell of a turnon thump by the look of it - the output goes nearly full +VE rail until the current source turns on. I nicked an idea from the Cambridge A3i amp on this score.
R6, D1. There's still some transition but it appears to be much less. I'm not counting the charging of the NFB capacitor here.
I guess the idea is it provides a -15V rail that comes up a lot quicker, so less thud.
I guess the idea is it provides a -15V rail that comes up a lot quicker, so less thud.
not C3?
it's very low value will charge fairly quickly. Eliminating C3 completely will allow the CCS to pass almost instantly.
it's very low value will charge fairly quickly. Eliminating C3 completely will allow the CCS to pass almost instantly.
C3 is mainly there to bypass the zener.
Some bump is acceptable.. and it settles within 2-3ms..
Some bump is acceptable.. and it settles within 2-3ms..
build it , man!!!by JC - Looks good on the sim to me
3) The R-C-R filter in the current source for the LTP produces a hell of a turnon thump by the look of it - the output goes nearly full +VE rail until the current source turns on. I nicked an idea from the Cambridge A3i amp on this score.
Now that is strange, I kept the same CCS from FA1 and 2,
with 4 in the house now..NO Thump. In fact , I was surprised
when first turned on the first FA1.. I thought I would have
hum and/or a little thump like I read about from other threads,
but no..nothing.
Of the 3 frugalamps , the 3-x series, even through it appears
unbalanced LTP wise, balances within .01mA (even better
than FA2) in the 2 tails Ic wise.
the only anomily is when you shut down the FA1/2 ,you hear a
little bit of crackle (distortion) as the rails collapse in the last
1/2 second..
If you build the FA3k (diamond) first, being untested, and like
it, I will build it ,too and make the board for it. But if you don't,
I going to make a pair of FA3's as I already have protoyped the
LPT/VAS/CCS and it rocks.
OS
ostripper said:
build it , man!!!
I know - what's putting me off is that I still don't have a 'scope, nor the funds to splash out for one 🙁
ostripper said:
Now that is strange, I kept the same CCS from FA1 and 2, with 4 in the house now..NO Thump. In fact , I was surprised when first turned on the first FA1.. I thought I would have hum and/or a little thump like I read about from other threads, but no..nothing.
It only seems to do it with the diamond - look at the first 5ms or so of the sim, using ".tran 0 10 0 startup uic" which simulates poweron. With the cascoded FA3, it doesnt happen - the output stays at 0 until the current source starts.
ostripper said:
Of the 3 frugalamps , the 3-x series, even through it appears unbalanced LTP wise, balances within .01mA (even better than FA2) in the 2 tails Ic wise.
I really like the Holman arrangement here. A very elegant solution for the VAS 🙂
Personally though I still like the "symasym" style "differential" VAS.
ostripper said:
the only anomily is when you shut down the FA1/2 ,you hear a little bit of crackle (distortion) as the rails collapse in the last 1/2 second..
Same with pretty much any power amp.
ostripper said:
If you build the FA3k (diamond) first, being untested, and like it, I will build it ,too and make the board for it. But if you don't, I going to make a pair of FA3's as I already have protoyped the LPT/VAS/CCS and it rocks.
We will see... I've got two heatsinks, 2x15000uF 80V, and a 2x35V 500VA toroid waiting to go... as well as most of the transistors... just wish i hada scope!
Os,
Your circuit doesn't have a sliding bias scheme as can be seen on the Krill amp, does it?
I thought you had built the FA3K version & likes it's sound - no?
Your circuit doesn't have a sliding bias scheme as can be seen on the Krill amp, does it?
I thought you had built the FA3K version & likes it's sound - no?
Doh - Sorry, Os, I just saw your posts way back regarding this & you have got a sliding compensation scheme somewhat like the Krill!
Has anybody built this FA3K version yet?
I'm interested in it for the output stage only - what is the PSRR for this alone?
Has anybody built this FA3K version yet?
I'm interested in it for the output stage only - what is the PSRR for this alone?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- The Frugalamp by OS