X is better than Y
hi Hacker,
Well the difference bweteen a Tent XO2, a Trichord and a KWAK-CLOCK is......................... hahahahahahahahahaha. 😀
OK, Jocko's clock is the best! LOL
Search this forum!
😱
Hacker said:Well, I'm surprised.
4 pages into this thread and nobody has posted a comment along the lines of "X is better than Y because of Z".
Which leads me to wonder: is there any real (noticable performance) difference between an XO2, Trichord4 or Kwak? Or does it come down to implementation? Ie, avoid shoving it through a '04.
hi Hacker,
Well the difference bweteen a Tent XO2, a Trichord and a KWAK-CLOCK is......................... hahahahahahahahahaha. 😀
OK, Jocko's clock is the best! LOL
Search this forum!
😱
Jocko, please post a link to your clock design.
Now, let's get back on track with this thread.
So, Elso.......Jocko's clock is the best!
Simple question .. Why?
Now, let's get back on track with this thread.
So, Elso.......Jocko's clock is the best!
Simple question .. Why?
Hi Poyton, do you know the meaning of LOL?poynton said:Jocko, please post a link to your clock design.
Now, let's get back on track with this thread.
So, Elso.......Jocko's clock is the best!
Simple question .. Why?
LOL 😀 😀 😀
This one??
http://home.att.net/~patslab/3fe5755e.gif
if that is the best contribution you can make to a thread then perhaps you should stop contributing!!!
the best contribution is..... from me
poynton,
Every clock creator finds his own clock the best. So did you expect a serious answer from me poynton? I am searching for Jocko's but why must I do all the work again?🙄
I tried a few clocks myself: LC-AudioXO2, Tent, Miniclock, KK Ho's clock.
The outcome? Highly biased (of course!) So..........??
Edit: here is the tread about Jocko's clock:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6194&highlight=
And here is mines:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=199928#post199928
poynton said:if that is the best contribution you can make to a thread then perhaps you should stop contributing!!!
poynton,
Every clock creator finds his own clock the best. So did you expect a serious answer from me poynton? I am searching for Jocko's but why must I do all the work again?🙄
I tried a few clocks myself: LC-AudioXO2, Tent, Miniclock, KK Ho's clock.
The outcome? Highly biased (of course!) So..........??
Edit: here is the tread about Jocko's clock:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6194&highlight=
And here is mines:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=199928#post199928
Division by 3 is certainly possible but will the clocked device accept a 2:1 mark/space ratio?
It's going to be used for DEM reclocking an 1541A
poynton said:
See post 5
yes, but......
most clock manufacturers don't publish measured data so comparison is not easilly made.
For several reasons I won't publish measurements on non-Tentlabs clocks
best
Universal oscillator.....hook this to your stratum reference and play along......
http://cp.home.agilent.com/upload/cmc_upload/E8257D.large2.jpg
No- I am not joking....🙄
Seriously- a universal oscillator of today is a frequency synthesizer, and building a simple one- with virtually no phase noise - is absolutely no joke.. alas - you are left with single X-tal oscillators, - and building good ones is no joke either
http://cp.home.agilent.com/upload/cmc_upload/E8257D.large2.jpg
No- I am not joking....🙄
Seriously- a universal oscillator of today is a frequency synthesizer, and building a simple one- with virtually no phase noise - is absolutely no joke.. alas - you are left with single X-tal oscillators, - and building good ones is no joke either
That's my clock circuit?????
Well, it kinda looks like it................
Guess I need to call my buddies out in Arizona and see what they have been smoking. Or whose computer they have hacked into.
So, you still have a microwave job. That makes you and MikeW......and how many guys in Texas that don't.
Not counting what used to be Collins Radio. That fiber optic stuff put all of us microwave cowboys out of work.
You can keep that fiber stuff. Can't "dent tune" its waveguide.
Well, you can........it just won't work if you do. Where's the fun in that?
Jocko.........off to Widlarise the blower motor that was in the heater at the house. Had to die the day it got down to 15 (F) in Texas.
Well, it kinda looks like it................
Guess I need to call my buddies out in Arizona and see what they have been smoking. Or whose computer they have hacked into.
So, you still have a microwave job. That makes you and MikeW......and how many guys in Texas that don't.
Not counting what used to be Collins Radio. That fiber optic stuff put all of us microwave cowboys out of work.
You can keep that fiber stuff. Can't "dent tune" its waveguide.
Well, you can........it just won't work if you do. Where's the fun in that?
Jocko.........off to Widlarise the blower motor that was in the heater at the house. Had to die the day it got down to 15 (F) in Texas.
DragonMaster said:
It's going to be used for DEM reclocking an 1541A
You'll have to take this up with one of the TDA1541A gurus.
You'll have to take this up with one of the TDA1541A gurus.
I still haven't found someone which is a clock guru too.
So can someone compare clocks here?
DragonMaster said:
I still haven't found someone which is a clock guru too.
So can someone compare clocks here?
So what do you do when someone says X measures better than Y and you then install X only to find, to you at least, it sounds awful? It matters not a jot how well something measures if you don't like the result.
rfbrw said:
So what do you do when someone says X measures better than Y and you then install X only to find, to you at least, it sounds awful? It matters not a jot how well something measures if you don't like the result.
Haven't we been here before??
6 pages along and nothing concrete to show!
---------------------------------------------------------
Here's a question one of the gurus may care to answer.
It was stated above that some cd-p's play faster than others. This would indicate that the bit-rate was different ( faster ). What effect on sound quality would this have if the dac clock (Kwak, Tent, Jocko or otherwise) was 'perfect'?
poynton said:
Haven't we been here before??
6 pages along and nothing concrete to show!
---------------------------------------------------------
Here's a question one of the gurus may care to answer.
It was stated above that some cd-p's play faster than others. This would indicate that the bit-rate was different ( faster ). What effect on sound quality would this have if the dac clock (Kwak, Tent, Jocko or otherwise) was 'perfect'?
GREAT, you can hear a 50ppm speed difference? How accurate is a tuning fork musicians use? You have a built in frequency counter in ur head, wooooow, respect!
You know how much a ppm is......?🙄
(gasping for air)
GREAT, you can hear a 50ppm speed difference? How accurate is a tuning fork musicians use? You have a built in frequency counter in ur head, wooooow, respect!
You know how much a ppm is......?
(gasping for air)
Well it's me that told that but it was practically an half tone pitch difference. I don't know if the XTals are different or not.
DragonMaster said:
Well it's me that told that but it was practically an half tone pitch difference. I don't know if the XTals are different or not.
A half tone difference is obviously a malfunction! Redbookstandard is 50 or 100 ppm , don't remember exactly 🙄
I don't remember exactly if it was an half tone as it was months ago but I was A/Bing when I found this. BTW, I hear a difference between single Hertz(At least in the 17-500Hz range) while A/Bing. Playing two instruments might help 😉 😀
specs?
1 on 500= 1/500 x 100%= 0.2% best case for your hearing. How much is a ppm again? Far out of spec anyway! Anyone???
Or 1 on 17Hz ? 6% WAY out of spec!!🙄
DragonMaster said:I don't remember exactly if it was an half tone as it was months ago but I was A/Bing when I found this. BTW, I hear a difference between single Hertz(At least in the 17-500Hz range) while A/Bing. Playing two instruments might help 😉 😀
1 on 500= 1/500 x 100%= 0.2% best case for your hearing. How much is a ppm again? Far out of spec anyway! Anyone???
Or 1 on 17Hz ? 6% WAY out of spec!!🙄
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Source
- The 'best' performing clock?