The 'best' performing clock?

Status
Not open for further replies.
X is better than Y

Hacker said:
Well, I'm surprised.

4 pages into this thread and nobody has posted a comment along the lines of "X is better than Y because of Z".

Which leads me to wonder: is there any real (noticable performance) difference between an XO2, Trichord4 or Kwak? Or does it come down to implementation? Ie, avoid shoving it through a '04.


hi Hacker,
Well the difference bweteen a Tent XO2, a Trichord and a KWAK-CLOCK is......................... hahahahahahahahahaha. 😀
OK, Jocko's clock is the best! LOL
Search this forum!
😱
 
the best contribution is..... from me

poynton said:
if that is the best contribution you can make to a thread then perhaps you should stop contributing!!!

poynton,
Every clock creator finds his own clock the best. So did you expect a serious answer from me poynton? I am searching for Jocko's but why must I do all the work again?🙄
I tried a few clocks myself: LC-AudioXO2, Tent, Miniclock, KK Ho's clock.
The outcome? Highly biased (of course!) So..........??


Edit: here is the tread about Jocko's clock:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6194&highlight=
And here is mines:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=199928#post199928
 
That's my clock circuit?????

Well, it kinda looks like it................

Guess I need to call my buddies out in Arizona and see what they have been smoking. Or whose computer they have hacked into.

So, you still have a microwave job. That makes you and MikeW......and how many guys in Texas that don't.

Not counting what used to be Collins Radio. That fiber optic stuff put all of us microwave cowboys out of work.

You can keep that fiber stuff. Can't "dent tune" its waveguide.

Well, you can........it just won't work if you do. Where's the fun in that?

Jocko.........off to Widlarise the blower motor that was in the heater at the house. Had to die the day it got down to 15 (F) in Texas.
 
DragonMaster said:


I still haven't found someone which is a clock guru too.

So can someone compare clocks here?

So what do you do when someone says X measures better than Y and you then install X only to find, to you at least, it sounds awful? It matters not a jot how well something measures if you don't like the result.
 
rfbrw said:

So what do you do when someone says X measures better than Y and you then install X only to find, to you at least, it sounds awful? It matters not a jot how well something measures if you don't like the result.

Haven't we been here before??

6 pages along and nothing concrete to show!

---------------------------------------------------------

Here's a question one of the gurus may care to answer.

It was stated above that some cd-p's play faster than others. This would indicate that the bit-rate was different ( faster ). What effect on sound quality would this have if the dac clock (Kwak, Tent, Jocko or otherwise) was 'perfect'?
 
poynton said:


Haven't we been here before??

6 pages along and nothing concrete to show!

---------------------------------------------------------

Here's a question one of the gurus may care to answer.

It was stated above that some cd-p's play faster than others. This would indicate that the bit-rate was different ( faster ). What effect on sound quality would this have if the dac clock (Kwak, Tent, Jocko or otherwise) was 'perfect'?


GREAT, you can hear a 50ppm speed difference? How accurate is a tuning fork musicians use? You have a built in frequency counter in ur head, wooooow, respect!
You know how much a ppm is......?🙄
(gasping for air)
 
specs?

DragonMaster said:
I don't remember exactly if it was an half tone as it was months ago but I was A/Bing when I found this. BTW, I hear a difference between single Hertz(At least in the 17-500Hz range) while A/Bing. Playing two instruments might help 😉 😀


1 on 500= 1/500 x 100%= 0.2% best case for your hearing. How much is a ppm again? Far out of spec anyway! Anyone???
Or 1 on 17Hz ? 6% WAY out of spec!!🙄
 
Status
Not open for further replies.