Terminated transmission line for midbass?

I'm intrigued by what I believe is called terminated transmission line...I mean a transmission line inside a sealed enclosure, to be used for the midbass within an active 4-way system.

A couple of sealed subwoofers take care below 80hz. The midabass would cover 80 to 450Hz or so, in a sealed enclosure. Midrange and tweeter would be in sealed boxes too, I think.

Is the midbass a good range for TL? I understand the back wave of the driver bounces back against the back of the cabinet (assuming a flat, vertical surface) and out through the cone itself, out of phase. This generates distortion and is most prominent at frequencies where 1/4 of the wavelength equates the depth of the cabinet. At 80Hz the 1/4 wave is 108cm long, at 150Hz it's 57cm, and at 300Hz it's 29cm. So in my mind midbass is where TL ought to be applied. Am I right?

Are the gains worth the trouble of building this? Maybe I'm conceptually correct but this is not material enough?

Alternatively I could build a quadratic residue diffuser against the back wall to break down the back wave, or even simply place a very large chamfered piece to scatter it.

FWIW, some midbass woofer alternatives under consideration are twin Beyma 10G40 per side (each in its own enclosure), or one 12P80Fe or Nd per side.

Looking forward to your input!
 
A sealed TL is a half-wave resonator. The idea is that with the radiation going thru all the damping to the end of the line and back it is pretty much all absorbed before it gets back to the driver. 1/2 wave at 80hz (by your calc) is 215 cm. If you are XOing that low you really would like to go lower.

The leading example of such a speaker is the 4-way Nautilus.

cc851155e31fb0963bf0eab559471666.jpg


dave
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maxine01
A sealed TL is a half-wave resonator. The idea is that with the radiation going thru all the damping to the end of the line and back it is pretty much all absorbed before it gets back to the driver. 1/2 wave at 80hz (by your calc) is 215 cm. If you are XOing that low you really would like to go lower.

The leading example of such a speaker is the 4-way Nautilus.

cc851155e31fb0963bf0eab559471666.jpg


dave

Yes, I was aware of the Nautilus. I've come across some posts saying it looks better than it sounds, so wondering it it's worth the effort.

So I should look at 1/2 wave length instead of 1/4 wave. What did you mean by this, though?
If you are XOing that low you really would like to go lower.
How long do I need to make the line for 80Hz crossover?
 
This looks closer to what I had in mind. Help me with the math: 1080mm long is about a full wavelength at 320Hz, or 1/2 wave at 160Hz, or 1/4 wave at 80Hz. What is the frequency range this box is designed for?

The 2.16 m length is based on your earlier statement that 1/4 wave length at 80 Hz is 108 cm. So for half wave it needs to be 2x as long, which is what the fold does. I did not check your math.

dave
 
Yes, I was aware of the Nautilus. I've come across some posts saying it looks better than it sounds, so wondering it it's worth the effort.

So I should look at 1/2 wave length instead of 1/4 wave. What did you mean by this, though?
How long do I need to make the line for 80Hz crossover?

Any perceived performance shortcomings has nothing to do with its driver loading, which SQ-wise is theoretically as good as it gets for a given net bulk.

As Dave noted, open [and tapered] pipes are 1/2 WL resonators, so Fp = SoS/2/pipe length is the acoustic tuning and then there's an end correction calculated based on the terminus area [Av or Sm] + any boundary loading [4, 2, 1 or 0.5 pi] conditions is subtracted to make its physical [cut] length shorter in reality, so the larger the Av and the greater the boundary area the shorter it will be.

The Nautilus though is closed at both ends, so its cut length = acoustic length like a plane wave tube [PWT], ergo can be stuffed all along its length or damped just at the end opposite the driver: Resonances of open air columns

GM
 
The idea of acoustically terminated transmission lines is nice in theory, but getting it to work in practice isn't trivial. You could probably get it to sound good, but I doubt it will be considerably better than a well-damped conventional closed box. You should google "acoustic impedance tube" for some theory.

By the way, what is commonly called a transmission-line loudspeaker, in my book really isn't. It's a badly terminated transmission-line at best, which I'd rather call a tuned resonator. In that sense it is actually similar to a bass-reflex loudspeaker.
 
The idea of acoustically terminated transmission lines is nice in theory, but getting it to work in practice isn't trivial. You could probably get it to sound good, but I doubt it will be considerably better than a well-damped conventional closed box. You should google "acoustic impedance tube" for some theory.

By the way, what is commonly called a transmission-line loudspeaker, in my book really isn't. It's a badly terminated transmission-line at best, which I'd rather call a tuned resonator. In that sense it is actually similar to a bass-reflex loudspeaker.

It's not that hard to get it to work well. I have used the Nautaloss with over 20 different drivers ranging from 2.5in to 5in and they all measure smoothly with no coloration or boxy sound. I stuff mine with polyfill the whole length. Measurements and sound clips are in the Subjective Blind Test tests. In my mind, it is about one of the most forgiving and easiest enclosures to work for mid bass and up. It measures like an open back infinite baffle.

Round 1:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full...nd-comparison-3in-5in-full-range-drivers.html

Round 2:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full...ind-comparison-3in-5in-drivers-round-2-a.html