SynTripP: 2-way 2-part Virtual Single Point Source Horn

I am printing a part that is 265cc and 12mm distance to xnull

Going to screw it in with some lath screws I had laying around so it can be removed (might try different ones to see what difference varying shapes / volumes have).
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 5.37.42 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 5.37.42 PM.png
    482.5 KB · Views: 967
  • 20160516_173825.jpg
    20160516_173825.jpg
    590.5 KB · Views: 1,188
There could be a potential to eventually chew up the wood where the screws bite in. My furniture maker friend suggested to me to be gentle with he screws to avoid this. Of course nuts would help avoid that.

I did like your idea of having one central bolt and a tnut.

Some fun foam as a gasket may work well underneath to prevent vibration during testing.
 
Last edited:
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
That is beautiful fit and finish. Truly a work of art. That tweeter aperture looks to be the perfect size for a 3.5in driver like a Scanspeak 10F/8424. Lower distortion and still 102dB with horn gain - a perfect match for dual 10CL65's. Plus you can cross over at 800Hz. Just a thought - even Weltersys has done this with a $10 TC9FD and agrees it sounds cleaner than a CD.

Here is what I was able to do with a little 2.5in SB65WBAC25-4.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full...l-range-tractrix-synergy-122.html#post4554591

Here is HD plot of 10F in the Trynergy at 1m and 100dB (mostly 2nd order and 3rd is tiny):
513199d1446925375-presenting-trynergy-full-range-tractrix-synergy-trynergy-10f-1khz-rta.png
 
Last edited:
Thanks xrk! Interesting. For now the plan is to work with what I have, a HF144 CD. I am going to make the throat adapter removable, so a different adapter could easily be made to fit something else. I am totally down to try it.

Manufacturer's response curve for the HF144 below

EDIT: just looked at the specs of the Scanspeak 10F/8424, looks to be nice and tiny depth-wise. Would be an easy fit dimensionally. Heckuva lot cheaper than a 3" diaphragm CD.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 3.39.39 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 3.39.39 PM.png
    51.9 KB · Views: 235
Last edited:
That tweeter aperture looks to be the perfect size for a 3.5in driver like a Scanspeak 10F/8424. Lower distortion and still 102dB with horn gain - a perfect match for dual 10CL65's. Plus you can cross over at 800Hz. Just a thought - even Weltersys has done this with a $10 TC9FD and agrees it sounds cleaner than a CD.
How well can these cone mid-tweets work at PA levels? Could it comfortably reach the same system SPL levels as with the CD?

Interested because it could have some significant implications if you could cut the driver cost on a synergy design similar to this.

Coincidentally, I picked up some OEM Mackie drivers off Craigslist for $15 each that look veeeery similar to Typhany FSL-1020R02-08, which in turn has very similar specs to the B&C drivers used here. Could make for a very amusingly low cost build.
 
Last edited:
Posting some progress

Phase plug is mounted (not sealed/glued yet)

Cut the side cleats and glued them

Installed the sides first (horn was just ever so slightly out of true, this will let me use the sides to true it up when the rest of the box is put together)
 

Attachments

  • 20160516_203911.jpg
    20160516_203911.jpg
    643.1 KB · Views: 514
  • 20160516_203926.jpg
    20160516_203926.jpg
    398.1 KB · Views: 472
  • 20160516_203821.jpg
    20160516_203821.jpg
    573.1 KB · Views: 446
  • 20160516_210703.jpg
    20160516_210703.jpg
    445.7 KB · Views: 458
  • 20160516_212925.jpg
    20160516_212925.jpg
    560.8 KB · Views: 476
  • 20160517_012835.jpg
    20160517_012835.jpg
    678.3 KB · Views: 501
  • 20160516_234027.jpg
    20160516_234027.jpg
    577.1 KB · Views: 1,553
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Thanks xrk! Interesting. For now the plan is to work with what I have, a HF144 CD. I am going to make the throat adapter removable, so a different adapter could easily be made to fit something else. I am totally down to try it.

Manufacturer's response curve for the HF144 below

EDIT: just looked at the specs of the Scanspeak 10F/8424, looks to be nice and tiny depth-wise. Would be an easy fit dimensionally. Heckuva lot cheaper than a 3" diaphragm CD.

That is a nice driver - wish I had one. It's actually designed for the LTH142 waveguide that I used for the bookshelf point source horn, which is now running the SB65WBAC25-4.

The 10F won't be able to generate pro level SPL's of course but is a great choice for HiFi or HT use. What it does make though will sound very clean relative to a compression driver.

Good idea to make throat adapters and easy to try at later time. You may just like what you hear.
 
A side thought in regards to the 10" driver:

The channel has been routed to permit movement to xmax, but theoretically the driver can move further than that, so there is a potential for it to crash into the horn wall piece at some point.

Peering into the holes, the most amount of movement I eyeballed was about 4-5mm peak to peak at full volume (full volume being limiters starting to nudge on the CD) So it seems there is no need to actually move right up to xmax.
If all you saw was 4-5mm peak to peak there was more than 6 dB of peak headroom left in the 10"s.

The channel is routed to avoid crashing at Xlim, not Xmax. The driver will exceed Xmax at well below full power if driven below Fb, which could happen if using the cabinet in a "full range" application- people have been known to load in the wrong presets ;^).
 
Originally Posted by xrk971
That tweeter aperture looks to be the perfect size for a 3.5in driver like a Scanspeak 10F/8424. Lower distortion and still 102dB with horn gain - a perfect match for dual 10CL65's. Plus you can cross over at 800Hz. Just a thought - even Weltersys has done this with a $10 TC9FD and agrees it sounds cleaner than a CD.

How well can these cone mid-tweets work at PA levels? Could it comfortably reach the same system SPL levels as with the CD?

Interested because it could have some significant implications if you could cut the driver cost on a synergy design similar to this.
Because of the much lower sensitivity a cone driver used for HF would limit the output to around 6-10 dB less- I'm using eight TC9FD-18-08 on 13 degree Maltese horns as center fill (4 per side) below the SynTripP cabinets.

The HF beaming of the small cone drivers limits the horizontal dispersion on a conical horn to around 45 degrees, rather than the 90 degrees the compression driver achieves.

Art
 
thunk, Fin was just telling me about somebody who recognized him from this thread while he was at a friend's place.. Is that you, maybe?

I can't wait to hear them. All of these experience reviews are getting me all giddy inside!!

Need a lathe!!

Don't think so, I have know fin for years. I had the pleasure of listening to the SynTripP outdoors where we could play with the eq for a few hours. Sitting about 100 metres back with a beer was a real moment. At one point we started getting close to flat response and they went from ok to solid gold! 😀 Have fun
 
The light at the end of the tunnel is still a ways away, but it is discernible. The box went together perfectly, and everything is square

Printing the second phase plug, then onto the throat adapter

Cannot wait for first sound. My roommates are stoked, too!
 

Attachments

  • 20160517_170904.jpg
    20160517_170904.jpg
    688.9 KB · Views: 975
My recommendation for awesome first sound experience.

Go outdoors somewhere. Away from noise and reflections if you can.

Time align the CD and Mids.
EQ flat with a measurement mic.
Put on some well recorded vocal stuff. Things your brain has references to.
Go back 25 feet and sit on a rug with some beer/cider for half an hour getting accustomed to the point source nature if it.



After a while, go for a walk around. Listen to what this thing can do from a distance. It's quite surreal.
 
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
JG,
Nice model of adapter. You might consider making it longer so that the expansion from 1.4in dia round to rectangle can be more gradual. I am thinking about 3x - 4x longer. My experience with a throat adapter on the xBush point source horn is that a gradual expansion made all the difference and reduced the cancellation dips corresponding to ten throat dia.