Super Regulator

Hi, please see picture, shunt is at the cond not at the input. The same L(C+R) is at the out. Can I post here complete simulation?
 

Attachments

  • shunt.jpg
    shunt.jpg
    110.2 KB · Views: 195
I'm going to build the superreg for my Pass Pearl II phono preamp (1 for each channel). + and - 24V. I read the whole thread, this answered most of my questions. I will try the OPA1611 as it seems to measure very well and was stable in other builds. For the output cap I selected TDK/Epcos b41888 series 100 uF 50V with a Z of 540 mOhm at 1Mhz. I do have a question about the C and R for the sense line. Stock values are 100 Ohm, 100 pF. Somewhere in the thread it was suggested that 10 Ohm and 0,01 uF would be better (lower resistance at high frequencies). Is it better to go with the alternative values, or should I just stay with the stock values? Second question is about the power dissipation of the pass transistor. I have about 33V coming in and 100mA per rail, so that would be 0.9W. Is there more (idle) dissipation that I should take into account when choosing the heatsink?
 
I don't know about 'lower resistance at high frequencies' - the purpose is to roll off the feedback at hf to prevent instability due to lengthy sense wires.
10R and 10nF might work, you could try it.
For the dissipation, there's no additional dissipation in the reg itself to speak of, so your 0.9W seems correct.

Jan
 
Thanks for your answer. I was referring to some posts by Walt Jung (#819 and 836). As I'm not really an electronics expert I thought I'd ask. Can't find the post about resistance. Maybe meant value of the resistor + reactance of the capacitor, which indeed is higher for 100R+100pF. But I don't know if that's desirable in this spot or not. There was also a post by someone who accidentally installed a 100 nF instead of 100 pF, which resulted in oscillation.
 
I have done things diferently, instead of resistor divider I added fet, and fb is connected at the star between coil and cap, it improved things a lot, would be happy if somebody confirm improvement. Also as Didden told there should be no low esr cap at the out, instead I have added some series resistance, see picture. I'm using NE5534
 

Attachments

  • fb.jpg
    fb.jpg
    47.7 KB · Views: 221
  • MultipleJungDidden.jpg
    MultipleJungDidden.jpg
    271.5 KB · Views: 229
Last edited:
You can inrease R5/12 to lower the current to save a bit, but not necessary.
R4/11 can stay anyway.

A quick look at the data sheet shows dynamic impedance pretty flat with current.
Noise spec is not given re: current, so assume it is also flat with current, and is filtered anyway.

Jan
 

Attachments

  • 329-a.PNG
    329-a.PNG
    8.4 KB · Views: 136
Well, I've finished building my first superreg:

superreg.jpg

voltage divider resistors still mounted provisionally. Voltage is within a hair of the theoretical value given the Vref and resistor values at 23,98 V and -23,97 V (loaded with a 1k resistor as shown). Opamp is the OPA1611.

When I put the probe of my scope on the output of the reg ( + or - leg of the 1k resistor, ground clamp of the probe to the return leg of the resistor) I'm seeing some strange pulses. Similar on the pos and the neg regulator. They also show up when I measure a 7809, so it might just be some interference the scope picks up? I'm not really an expert here.

output pos reg.png

(2mV/div and 10mS/div)