Apex sr 200 studio referance.
All tests as follows
Usys.+/-45v
Cpsu.51.000uf/rail.
out.transistors 2x2sc3264
2x2sa1295
idle current.45ma(25mv on 0.33R)
Vinp. 570mvrms
Vout. 24.6VRMS
Rload 8R
Finaly 3 other photos
1) 1KHz behind zobel
2) 1KHz after zobel
3) 10KHz behind zobel
4) 10KHz after zobel.
5) zero offset.
6)570mv inp ,24v out just pehind cliping
All tests as follows
Usys.+/-45v
Cpsu.51.000uf/rail.
out.transistors 2x2sc3264
2x2sa1295
idle current.45ma(25mv on 0.33R)
Vinp. 570mvrms
Vout. 24.6VRMS
Rload 8R
Finaly 3 other photos
1) 1KHz behind zobel
2) 1KHz after zobel
3) 10KHz behind zobel
4) 10KHz after zobel.
5) zero offset.
6)570mv inp ,24v out just pehind cliping
Attachments
Last edited:
I should thank you Sr for the fantastic amplifier gave us.
I hope you are always healthy and always with us.🙂🙂🙂🙂
Best regards.
Thimios.
Agrinio Greece.
Last edited:
Apex sr 200 studio referance.
I also want to thank everyone who helped in addressing the problem.
Regards.
I also want to thank everyone who helped in addressing the problem.
Regards.
Apex sr 200 studio referance.
Thank you especially Mr.Alex mm.🙂
Without your's printed circuit board construction would be impossible.🙂
Mr Apex just missed my own question.
This time circuit is with R11=8K2
R18=2K2
added 18pf between collector Q9 base Q2
Theese all modifications.
Is it necessary to keep them all?
Regards.
Oh I'm literally unpardonable for this my omission
Thank you especially Mr.Alex mm.🙂
Without your's printed circuit board construction would be impossible.🙂
Mr Apex just missed my own question.
This time circuit is with R11=8K2
R18=2K2
added 18pf between collector Q9 base Q2
Theese all modifications.
Is it necessary to keep them all?
Regards.
Last edited:
Thim,
can you post your final schematic? Add notes on what values you changed to reach that success.
And finally what values did not work for your build.
can you post your final schematic? Add notes on what values you changed to reach that success.
And finally what values did not work for your build.
sr200 studio refer.
I'm on the road for version 3.2 but at this time haven't many parts
Thanks Mr Apex🙂
Thanks Mr Alex mm🙂
I'm on the road for version 3.2 but at this time haven't many parts
Thanks Mr Apex🙂
Thanks Mr Alex mm🙂
Attachments
Dear Adrew this is shematic last modified by Apex. Red values are the modifications.
Keep in mind that original schematic is functional also with a little problem an overshot
probably.
Attachments
Last edited:
For an output zobel, you take the output/speaker leads from directly across the resistor, not the inductor. This is because the resistor needs to have as little series inductance as possible to increase damping at RF. Stray inductance of the inductor leads, as you may have guessed, does not matter. I would use carbon comp for this resistor if possible.
Last edited:
any chance to see a drawing of this
zobel..inductor...I dont understand what you are saying
(zobel cap/resistor is in parallel with output/speaker, and inductor/resistor would be in series)
zobel..inductor...I dont understand what you are saying
(zobel cap/resistor is in parallel with output/speaker, and inductor/resistor would be in series)
sr200 studio refer.
Well i did not understand . In your diagrame Zobel is in parallel to the loudspeaker?
As you say non inductive resistors is the must for that circuits but if you haven't ?
Well i did not understand . In your diagrame Zobel is in parallel to the loudspeaker?
As you say non inductive resistors is the must for that circuits but if you haven't ?
Last edited: