Yes, it is based on an audio purifier! But you need a special power cord for the laser.
Hey I have a couple of those!
Nuh-uh, mine is battery operated. A very special battery mind you. It can only be recharged on a photon quantum VHS discombobulating Betamax aperiodic magnetizer.
And those are getting hard to find.
Good point, from the passive point of view.
Try deflecting them with a field of some kind 🙂.
Cheers,
Bob
Hey, I'm a passive kinda guy...
Isn't that what we gots da earth for??
Cheers, jn
The infamous...field of dreams, better known as the wavicle field...😀
Or was it the popsicle field..yah, that sounds better...tastes better too.
jn
The famous double-slit experiment works for electrons, photons and the like, but not for Schroeders cat.
There will only be a splatter pattern as a cruel demonstration of the wave-particle duality.
Last edited:
WOW... now we have indeterminate speaker cables. How do you test that?
Maybe the electrons get to the driver via the cable, maybe not? I bet they only take that path while my meter is on... Dang you illusion of control!!!
Maybe the electrons get to the driver via the cable, maybe not? I bet they only take that path while my meter is on... Dang you illusion of control!!!
??? Very long radio waves?
"The U.S.Navy communticates with submerged submarines using 76-Hz radio waves"
Probably. 😛
As an aside (and mainly to confirm I'm not completely losing it / imagining things), was there a link to a (IIRC) French forum lurking here a couple of days ago which seemed to be discussing a wire with a battery attached?
As an aside (and mainly to confirm I'm not completely losing it / imagining things), was there a link to a (IIRC) French forum lurking here a couple of days ago which seemed to be discussing a wire with a battery attached?
There is a thread on this forum about an interconnect with a battery attached.
Stereo is like the double-slit experiment. If you want to hear music you mustn't ask which speaker the sound came from. It sounds even better when you are not listening, which may be why DBT (allegedly) fails. As Heisenberg-Fourier tell us, if you want really pure tones then you have to give up all notions of when they occured. If you want perfect timing in your music, then you can't know which note is being played so you can't tell which tune is being played!
Stereo is like the double-slit experiment. If you want to hear music you mustn't ask which speaker the sound came from. It sounds even better when you are not listening, which may be why DBT (allegedly) fails. As Heisenberg-Fourier tell us, if you want really pure tones then you have to give up all notions of when they occured. If you want perfect timing in your music, then you can't know which note is being played so you can't tell which tune is being played!
Sorry, physicist's idea of a joke. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and Fourier analysis end up essentially at the same point: there are pairs of observables which can't simultaneously be precise (position, momentum; frequency, time). Interestingly, both come together in a CD player. Heisenberg explains the laser, while Fourier limits what you can do with brick-wall filters.
This cable:
http://www.audioquest.com/pdfs/earth_feature/everest.pdf
21E3 $ for 2 x 10 ft.
Comes with free batteries.
vac
http://www.audioquest.com/pdfs/earth_feature/everest.pdf
21E3 $ for 2 x 10 ft.
Comes with free batteries.
vac
then there's the issue of negative music... analogous with negative energy or dark matter.... the more you listen, the worse it sounds... ;-)
or maybe there's an analog to a Bose-Einstein condensate... wherein all components of the music reproduction chain act as a single entity and produce absolute nirvana???
or maybe there's an analog to a Bose-Einstein condensate... wherein all components of the music reproduction chain act as a single entity and produce absolute nirvana???
- Status
- Not open for further replies.