Revisiting some "old" ideas from 1970's - IPS, OPS

Valery
I was thinking about this from the beginning...
btw what is output impedance/DF of your NS-OPS?

Hi Pawel,

I did not measure on the live prototype yet, but simulation shows the following:
- OPS within GNFB: Zo = 0.4 mOhm (milli-ohm);
- OPS out of GNFB: Zo = 0.1 Ohm.

250 times difference = 48db, that's exactly the feedback loop gain :)
Laws of physics are working as usual :p
 
Maybe a moderate of global fb would be best, say 25-30dB?

Hi Hugh,

You're revealing my "secret" :D
Yes - nested feedback. In fact the best result is achieved when splitting these 48db loop gain between the global loop and the loop around the front-end.
I'm still experimenting with regards to the best proportion, although in principal it seems to be a very good approach. Our "production" PCB for Vertical + NS-OPS (designed by Jeff) already incorporates this feature.

Cheers,
Valery
 
Another "old" possibility as an alternative FB method:
The ALTMANN SPLIF Amplifier Topology
Or you can adjust it to the "middle" with a (0 - 1R) resistor between the protected pair and the load driver pair(s).

Altman's approach does not make too much sense to me as the protected pair works with no load - so, it's almost the same as just connecting the feedback to VAS output. Connecting the protected pair to the loaded one with resistor - yes, that's interesting. Some room for experiments ;)
 
A first test done putting 47pf in position of c18,19 .This test wasn't successful. Then the compensation increased to 68pf. That's it!The problem solved.
A full test later this afternoon.
Thimios

OK - VAS does not like that additional pole from the OPS :)
BTW, this cap value increase will practically not slow down the overall front-end's step response. Looking forward to seeing your test results :cool:
 
Testing vertical CFA+Slewmaster

Power supply +/-50v
54000uf/rail
Idle current 54mA/Pair
Offset 0mV
1V RMS INP 27 V RMS OUT/6R=120W RMS.Before a visible clip.
 

Attachments

  • DSC09679.JPG
    DSC09679.JPG
    585.2 KB · Views: 671
  • DSC09689.JPG
    DSC09689.JPG
    515.5 KB · Views: 143
  • DSC09688.JPG
    DSC09688.JPG
    540.6 KB · Views: 134
  • DSC09687.JPG
    DSC09687.JPG
    548.8 KB · Views: 155
  • DSC09686.JPG
    DSC09686.JPG
    519.5 KB · Views: 152
  • DSC09685.JPG
    DSC09685.JPG
    548.2 KB · Views: 204
  • DSC09684.JPG
    DSC09684.JPG
    562.6 KB · Views: 602
  • DSC09683.JPG
    DSC09683.JPG
    559 KB · Views: 608
  • DSC09682.JPG
    DSC09682.JPG
    607 KB · Views: 604
  • DSC09681.JPG
    DSC09681.JPG
    563.8 KB · Views: 652
the rest
 

Attachments

  • DSC09701.JPG
    DSC09701.JPG
    577 KB · Views: 138
  • DSC09699.JPG
    DSC09699.JPG
    511.8 KB · Views: 137
  • DSC09698.JPG
    DSC09698.JPG
    611.8 KB · Views: 136
  • DSC09697.JPG
    DSC09697.JPG
    535.7 KB · Views: 128
  • DSC09696.JPG
    DSC09696.JPG
    533.6 KB · Views: 127
  • DSC09695.JPG
    DSC09695.JPG
    582.6 KB · Views: 115
  • DSC09694.JPG
    DSC09694.JPG
    536.9 KB · Views: 88
  • DSC09693.JPG
    DSC09693.JPG
    597.1 KB · Views: 97
  • DSC09691.JPG
    DSC09691.JPG
    530.4 KB · Views: 108
  • DSC09690.JPG
    DSC09690.JPG
    597.2 KB · Views: 134
Looks good, huh? ;)
Did you listen to it?
Not yet....just for a little.
I have some other test
Doing this test i see that,connecting speaker GND on power amplifier board is a bad practice.
Star GND is better.Even better a second clean GND position.
 

Attachments

  • DSC09724.JPG
    DSC09724.JPG
    540.4 KB · Views: 693
  • DSC09725.JPG
    DSC09725.JPG
    591 KB · Views: 673
  • DSC09723.JPG
    DSC09723.JPG
    607.9 KB · Views: 672
Last edited:
I think there is some loop in your grounding scheme in this case - mine is dead silent with the input connected to the pre-amp.

Am I right - at the previous measurements the speaker ground is connected to PSU ground?
Yes in all the previous measurements the speaker gnd is connected to psu gnd and the devider gnd on psu gnd.Hot cable of devider is connected to speaher out on pcb, behide R.L
How you avoid the gnd loop?
 
Last edited:
In the meanwhile i made some minutely tests on my vertical ns-ops. I am very curious if thimios confirms them.
Pros:
The most distortion-less and clear CC Catch playing that i ever heard
Cons:
Heights-a little too sterile for my taste. My classA amp sounds sweeter.
Lows-too flat, week and heartless.I am exaggerating!!! Hint: i only use 20000uF per rail
Conclusion: if you like CC Catch this is the amp
 
In the meanwhile i made some minutely tests on my vertical ns-ops. I am very curious if thimios confirms them.
Pros:
The most distortion-less and clear CC Catch playing that i ever heard
Cons:
Heights-a little too sterile for my taste. My classA amp sounds sweeter.
Lows-too flat, week and heartless.I am exaggerating!!! Hint: i only use 20000uF per rail
Conclusion: if you like CC Catch this is the amp

There is a special option for this kind of situation now - Vertical VFA with nested feedback - it's warmer and sweeter (NS-OPS is the same). Listening to it right now - jazz trio sounds brilliant :cool: