Power Amplifier LJM L20SE

Hi A8,
perhaps you can take a look to the LJM L20.5. That amp is sounding very well. One thing, i have read,
Transistor T9 has to get 300 pf 500V ceramic instead of 100 pf (millercapacitor). https://tonbandforum.de/showthread.php?tid=26889
Sometimes the driver transistors have changed. The chinese people build in what they get.
https://www.diy-hifi-forum.eu/forum/showthread.php?20484-Vorstellung-LJM-L20-5-Amp. The user Saarmichel has build the L20.5 in BTL.
Output stage of my L20.5 are the KEC Transistors. You can also choose 2SC5200/A1943 or similar...
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...st-data-my-design.323965/page-11#post-7469238
A few years ago i could hear my L20.5 on Manger Speakers https://mangeraudio.com/de/systeme/produkt/p1-de
The L20.5 has driven this speakers easily. Not every amp can drive this speakers with clear and brialliance sound.

Peter
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: A 8
perhaps you can take a look to the LJM L20.5. That amp is sounding very well. One thing, i have read,
Transistor T9 has to get 300 pf 500V ceramic instead of 100 pf (millercapacitor).
Hello Peter!
I hasten to warn you that increasing this capacitor from 100pF to 300pF reduces the gain of the input stage at a frequency of 20 kHz and therefore its linearity deteriorates by 6.4 dB, which is a lot. Because The input stage gain at frequency drops from +5.4dB at (100pF) to -1dB (300pF).
In this case, the pole is the frequency at which the output impedance of the amplifier begins to increase at 100pF = 740Hz, and at 300pF = 252Hz.
It is possible that an indirect improvement in sound occurs due to an increase in output impedance in the frequency range of 250-800 Hz, but one must understand that in this case the nonlinearity of the frequency response increases. The sound becomes specific.

Can it be improved with the L20.5 mod? yes, but not by increasing the miller capacitor from 100pF to 300pF.
 
Last edited:
There is another reason why the sound with a 300pF Miller capacitor is perceived better by ear - this is the limitation of the HF spectrum when controlling the Shiklai output stage, this almost always reduces distortion at HF, perhaps this is associated with an audible improvement in sound.
and from here comes the logic of the modification of this amplifier, adjust the amplifier so that, on the one hand, it does not reduce the linearity of the input stage, and on the other hand, limit the control spectrum of the Shiklai output stage.
 
Hello Hennady,
thanks for your warning. It seems to be not a good idea to change the miller cap. No fear, i havent changed anything. I am satisfied with my L20.5.
"Never change a running sytem" in some case true...
You see..i have to learn a lot...
I will write your statement to one else, because he decide to do..

Peter
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hennady Kovalsky
Pictures of my L20.5...
Top aluminium plate was laser cut, very interesting..time 30sec...i could see a video...
The case bought on Ali Express i found never again. The shop was banned, the reason i dont know.
No more pictures of other amps in this thread now...
I am waiting for the delivery of the L20SE kits, measure and send the zip files to jlcpcb...exiting...
 

Attachments

  • front.jpg
    front.jpg
    248.9 KB · Views: 129
  • innen.jpg
    innen.jpg
    600.8 KB · Views: 127
  • Top.jpg
    Top.jpg
    272.6 KB · Views: 120
I'll have to disappoint you, mods will bring the circuitry to life in terms of load characteristics, but for high sound quality I think this solution will not be enough.
But Surround Sound Stage will work better with these mods.
Ok, and I too think it should be good for the surrounds if I could get rid of what I assume is power-supply harmonics. The odd thing with it is that it seems to be more harmonics over 500hz at the output compared to what's on the rails.

Any idea if this would be cleaned up with the mods you suggested?

No Signal FFT speaker output:
no signal.jpg


This is the supply voltage FFT taken directly on the rail+- 40 volts and yes I have them filtered so its pretty good. 0dBFS is around 3 volts RMS on the "no signal FFT" and around 10 volts relative to 80 volts DC across both rails on the below FFT:
railvoltage fft.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMD FFT.jpg
    IMD FFT.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 57
  • 1khz fft.jpg
    1khz fft.jpg
    86.7 KB · Views: 64
I have been thinking it was a ground problem for a long time and have made changes over the last few months to see if it makes a difference but it does not matter what "sane" changes I did, it stays pretty much exactly the same. Cant be heard though, even close to the speaker its silent.

Anyways, I have 8 unpopulated pcb's on order now so will try out the mods and see what it does to the measurements and sonics.

Thx.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hennady Kovalsky
You see..i have to learn a lot...
I will write your statement to one else, because he decide to do..

Peter
Here is an example of modding the MX50SE using progressive correction, see attachment. This is the effect of correction on the linearity of the input stage. Therefore, when I did this, everything sounds very clean and beautiful...)))

HenK
 

Attachments

  • don't look up.jpg
    don't look up.jpg
    293.6 KB · Views: 137
  • Like
Reactions: Kleinhorn and A 8
At the first look, simple.. but not for me 😕
I have to learn a lot. If my last projects done, i first will take my new scope, remaining here over one year unused, learn to use it. I have done never before, not necessary in my life until now, but heard from it...😀
I have to read a lot, get my first book about circuit technology.
And so on...

Best regards

Peter
 
At the first look, simple.. but not for me 😕
I have to learn a lot.
I also strongly recommend reconsidering the design preferences when laying out the grounding wires of the GND, because linear and broadband amplification will require minimizing power supply and grounding wire loops.
The methodology that you use is relevant for monoblocks, when each channel has a separate power supply. This book was written when large tube amplifiers were being manufactured as monoblocks, but in an integrated design, when there is 1 block power supply for 2 channels,the absence of an additional ground loop between the channels is of great importance; in this case there will be no desire to “listen to the wires” and their effect on the sound.
Unfortunately, your design has a lot of unnecessary ground loops.

HenK
 
If my L20.5 is powerd i cant hear no hum or withe noise at all in my speakers. There is dead silence.
You think that there are groundloops because i have only one smps for powering the boards ? I can build a "starground" with one pcb in front of the smps.
That is a possibilty to cut the second connection to the output. The protection board only need one ground connection to measure.

Peter
 
Hello Peter!
Attached are design options
maybe it seemed to me - on the left is your option
On the right is my version of the design - this version is currently working for me at home.
Can you comment? Maybe I’m still wrong and yours is not turned on correctly and I’m also not designing the wiring of the grounding wires correctly.
 

Attachments

  • Henk GND.jpg
    Henk GND.jpg
    48.8 KB · Views: 116