Monolithic SuperSymmetry with Current Feedback

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
My High Power CFB Aleph X

Well here it is latest and most probably final CFB X design.

Supersymmetry is definely possible but I am yet to full investigate the possibilities to see if i like it better than this balanced version.

I might even start a seperate thread.

Tim
 

Attachments

  • cfb aleph x (medium).jpg
    cfb aleph x (medium).jpg
    45.9 KB · Views: 787
100W Super Symmetrical Current Feedback Aleph X

Sorry i'll try again

This is the same circuit as per the CF Aleph X but with added super symmetry feedback.

super symmetry wasn't as simple to add as i though because the improved common mode rejection, would reject any common mode biasing
:bawling:

But i sorted it out and here it is.....
 

Attachments

  • super symmetrical cfb aleph x (medium).jpg
    super symmetrical cfb aleph x (medium).jpg
    48.7 KB · Views: 737
Disabled Account
Joined 2002
The.Long.and.Winding.Load

Now I am retiring from this thread, posting my final drawing.

Function: works well
Sound: much better than I expect

Many thanks: to Nelson Pass
And thanks for all of your attention and interest.

:) JH :)

PS. I am preparing to post this to PASSDIY if this has a quality for it.
 

Attachments

  • p_y3_jh_final.jpg
    p_y3_jh_final.jpg
    94.9 KB · Views: 1,129
Disabled Account
Joined 2002
Return with new-building

Last week I finished three new Monolithic SuperSymmetries for fun. To these new gears, I gave two changes. One was change of the original EI transformer of 300VA (2x12V secondary) to Toroidal of 400VA. Another was replacement of the current boosting transistor MJ802/4502 with MJ15003/4 (in the next opportunity, I would try with Darlington transistors). Oh.... I also newly arranged one thermistor (6ohms, 7A, of outer dia. of 22mm) in the primary side of the transformer.

I had 1-week listening trial before the final launching of the gears and clearly felt better sound in mid and high frequencies. In addition, I got better dynamics when I tried movie sound tracks. I have no idea whether this improvement happens due to new transistors or new transformer or both of them. It comes one step closer to my own ideal sound (imagination).

In this weekend, I am going to connect one amp for one speaker by paralleling amp’s left and right channels to one mono unit. Of course, I need two amps to do this. It is not a problem because I have three now. This is mainly to increase output current to double capacity.

By the way, in this new-building, I again used hard wiring instead of using PCB. This means inside looks rather ugly. Very much ugly compared to the beautiful inside look of Pass XA-100 which I saw from the picture in Japanese Stereo Sound. Hmmm…. I have to think about using PCB if I build any next project and make the amp case wide, flat and beautiful, for example like Pass XA-100.

:cool:
 

Attachments

  • new-construction.jpg
    new-construction.jpg
    35.3 KB · Views: 947
Disabled Account
Joined 2002
Could not wait

Here are two mono blocks. Well, it seems that the speakers no more hungry for curret. They roar from the deeper end. (Mmmm........... I should have used dalington TRs.)

To me, your ugly stuff still looks pretty. Probably, the effect is from your name behind them. ;)
 

Attachments

  • two_mono.jpg
    two_mono.jpg
    34 KB · Views: 797
Disabled Account
Joined 2002
Thanks, Hugo.

For your info. I introduced minor touch when I did paralleling circuits. The input resistors were originally arranged first 10K and behind it 47K to the ground, but their positions are now changed, i.e. first 47K to the ground and behind it 10K. In addition, I newly introduced the output ¡°ballast¡± resistors (reference: http://www.national.com/an/AN/AN-1192.pdf) of 10W 0.11Ohms (actually, 5W 0.22/parallel/5W 0.22). I have no idea about technical details of the ballast resistors, but I understand that they take role to help separation of the two amp units as independent even if they are paralleled. Anyhow, I found that, with or without the ballast resistors, the paralleled mono blocks show output offset voltages at less than 10mV. I should be happy with these low offsets as I got them with no effort of matching components.

:cool:
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2002
Hi, John-china

I got the wood from Ikea (Yi Jia) near to Shang Hai Ba Wan Ren Ti Yu Guan. They had many different panel sizes. My choice was the size of 15mm/190mm/1200mm (t/w/l). I cut them myself with Bosch GST 100 BCE jigsaw. The wood was soft for me to handle easy, but was strong enough to be part of the heavy box.

I ordered heat sinks and aluminium plates from Ke Ji Jing Cheng, Bei Jing Dong Lu. I drilled all bolt holes myself with Bosch GRS 14,4-1 cordless screwdriver drill. To keep the holes to the correct positions, I made drawings using PowerPoint, and print them out on the paper, and glued them to the plates. In addition, when I drilled the holes, I gave 1mm margins to the required hole sizes.

All work done on the kitchen table.

Hope this info. will help.

Regards
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2002
To whom has interest.

The enclosed sketches show how I tried two alternatives.
Fig.1 demonstrates how I paralleled the amps.
Fig.2 demonstrates how I did bi-amping.

Speaker is Audio Physic Yara (4 ohms 90dB).

For the tight bass sound, I vote for the alternative 1.
For overall sound, I however vote for the alternative 2

:cool:
 

Attachments

  • block dia.jpg
    block dia.jpg
    66.4 KB · Views: 717
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.