Midbass horn

Status
Not open for further replies.
Snappy perhaps, but not punchy. The only 12" that I have found models good down to 80Hz in hornresp is Hentai's DIY field coils. I would love to try them out, but $$$ so I have to save up.
Rewind,

Perhaps you missed this horn (although it uses 2x10", not a single 12):

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/mult...ual-single-point-source-horn.html#post4114406

The SynTripP horn has a measured F3 of 82 Hz, although the ports it uses "as built" are of a different size and shape than the Hornresp sim that results in the same Fb, but it measures close to the sim.

Three things for certain: the SynTripP horn is both snappy and punchy, and together the two 10" it uses cost less than most 12" with the same output potential.

Art
 
That is a very nice design. Would you draw it in see-through in an angle? I am having difficulties understanding the insides.
As I wrote before, I think Synergy horns are a compromise in regards to the amount of horn sizes and where to put them. I think a proper range of sizes of horns is more important than compactness, at least for my living room. Your horn is not very compact anyway. 😉
 
A folded Synergie horn like the old folded mid-bass horn with a square meter mouth and the cd driver above because the folded horn ?

Maybe a folded synergie will avoid more distance between the listener and the mouth of the synergie ? Or doest the direct sound is a part of the design (cd driver treble in front of the listener at the base of the synergie horn) ?
 
No design in mind. I'm just asking if someone thinked to make a folded Synergie Horn like the old-mid-bass folded horn with CD driver where the apex is looking at the celling ! those old mid bass folded horn were often with a mouth of 1 square meter with their ugly CD driver just above it because of the length (wide) needed between the apex and the mouth!

Why because I find, for home use, most of us have less place in length or width. Btw many synergies design are wider (or some also like a square like some Danleys) than deeper. Exception to the mid-bas horn which are more deeper than width (like VolvoT. in him web site or some than Carpenter member makes also!)

So folded mid-bass : we know it already from a long time, but is it possible with synergie design (or a coax) with a folded design to minimize the foot print ? Or is it not possible by design (Synergies needs a direct horn expansion for its perfect beaming ?
 
Last edited:
Horns will always take place. If you want the most horn experience per square meter, go for a regular midbass speaker design together with as large horn as you can fit with the compression driver. I think the synergy horn just saves place vertically. It will still be big if it is for midbass.
 
SPACE

Horns will always take place. If you want the most horn experience per square meter, go for a regular midbass speaker design together with as large horn as you can fit with the compression driver. I think the synergy horn just saves place vertically. It will still be big if it is for midbass.

Even that is a compromise, as almost every system is. I fully understand you mean that it took up less space. Using a compression driver in a large format round horn forces a crossover in the so-called intelligence band:
(300-3K Hz per Bell Labs) It's something I wish to avoid, but it does not bother
others to do so.
Also, horns sound best with other horns, and should be used, except for the deepest bass, where a HUGE bass reflex or infinite baffle works out better.
Just my 2 cents, & Happy Listening to all 🙂
 
Hello,
I will post here, same subject, different driver.

Currently i have OpenBaffle 3Way active. Bass- H frame 15" per side, Visaton BG20 8" mids and Philips tweeters.

I want a mid horn, first horn for me to build, and i want to use the existing Visaton BG20. Crossed at 150 and 1.2k. From there up, i have 2 drivers to play but that is a different topic. I know Visaton is crap compared to other speakers but for first time horn to experiment with i think it is OK. Or am i wasting time??

I made some simulations with Hornresp.
Please take a look and see if you can see any problem. The speaker input parameters are taken from Visaton site, Vtc and Atc is not exactly calculated yet, i entered some roughly values. I intend to build it conical, 4 sides. KISS.

Q: In group delay sim, if i will cross at 150 HP LR4, that spike in group delay will be a problem?
Q2: In acoustical impedance sim, does things look ok? What should i be after?
Q3: Phase response sim, should i be worried about that circled spikes? They are outside my intended usage.

Any other tips are appreciated,
Thank you!🙂
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    89.5 KB · Views: 705
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    59 KB · Views: 688
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    60.7 KB · Views: 683
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    65.7 KB · Views: 677
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    72.6 KB · Views: 679
I am no expert at hornresp, but to me it does not look like a great horn. The acoustic power graph should be more flat. Have a look at this horn: 135 hz Mid Bass Horn - The Paper Horn by Inlow Sound

The Eminence Alpha has a rather low sensitivity of 94 dB, but it could work. Fs is around 70-80Hz and xmax is only 3mm, which is good. Hope you have a bass driver that can be driven up to 150-200Hz with clean midbass. I found that the Eminence LAB12 cannot. JBL 15" PA bass drivers were better.
 
" I had BR before and i don't like how it sounds. "

What kind of alignment did you choose?

The SBB4 has the best transient response of all the vented alignments.

When used with a high-pass filter matched to the cut-off of the box it will sound very 'fast'

My PPSL designs will change the way you think about reflex.

gi.gif


A PPSL midbass horn.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.