Low distortion current driven Class-B output stage

some measurments (global feedback was not applied)
spectrum 1W/4R 1kHz and 10kHz

attachment.php


attachment.php


THDvF 1W 10W 50W /4R

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • LeXaN Buffer K4 LNFB 1K 1W 4R.png
    LeXaN Buffer K4 LNFB 1K 1W 4R.png
    71.4 KB · Views: 1,663
  • LeXaN Buffer K4 LNFB 10K 1W 4R.png
    LeXaN Buffer K4 LNFB 10K 1W 4R.png
    66.6 KB · Views: 1,657
  • LeXaN Buffer K4 LNBF THDvF 1W 10W 50W into 4R.png
    LeXaN Buffer K4 LNBF THDvF 1W 10W 50W into 4R.png
    33.7 KB · Views: 1,097
When global feedback is applied, even harmonics are less reduced than odd ones. What could be the explanation?

1W/4R 1kHz, no global feedback
2H 0.0028% -91dB
3H 0.00077% -102dB
4H 0.00062% -104dB
5H 0.00051% -106dB


1W/4R 1kHz, global feedback
2H 0.00053% -106dB
3H 0.000026% -132dB
4H 0.00022% -113dB
5H 0.000030% -131dB


Distortion reduction by global feedback
H2 15dB
H3 30dB
H4 9dB
H5 25dB


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • LeXaN Buffer K4 GNFB 1K 1W 4R.png
    LeXaN Buffer K4 GNFB 1K 1W 4R.png
    70.4 KB · Views: 1,052
First measurments of the Class B+G prototype.

Outer PSU +-48V
Inner PSU +-24V
Yellow trace = output into 4R
Blue trace = upper/inner transistor collector voltage
Magenta trace = lower/inner transistor collector voltage
 

Attachments

  • LeXaN-BUFv2-sqr10k-60Vpp-4R.jpg
    LeXaN-BUFv2-sqr10k-60Vpp-4R.jpg
    118 KB · Views: 164
  • LeXaN-BUFv2-sin20k-70Vpp-4R.jpg
    LeXaN-BUFv2-sin20k-70Vpp-4R.jpg
    129.8 KB · Views: 141
  • LeXaN-BUFv2-sin10k-70Vpp-4R.jpg
    LeXaN-BUFv2-sin10k-70Vpp-4R.jpg
    126.6 KB · Views: 175
  • LeXaN-BUFv2-sin1k-lim-4R.jpg
    LeXaN-BUFv2-sin1k-lim-4R.jpg
    122.9 KB · Views: 153
  • LeXaN-BUFv2-sin1k-70Vpp-4R.jpg
    LeXaN-BUFv2-sin1k-70Vpp-4R.jpg
    129.5 KB · Views: 194
  • LeXaN-BUFv2-on-bench.jpg
    LeXaN-BUFv2-on-bench.jpg
    712.4 KB · Views: 184
The distortion is bad when high voltage rails are involved. The transition is somewhere between 11-12 Vrms. The 100Hz modulation is also very strong above the transition line, but acceptable at higher outputs like 18Vrms. Tony, what do you think ? Where is the problem ?
 

Attachments

  • LeXaN-Bufv2-sin1k-11Vrms-4R.png
    LeXaN-Bufv2-sin1k-11Vrms-4R.png
    86.4 KB · Views: 348
  • LeXaN-Bufv2-sin1k-12Vrms-4R.png
    LeXaN-Bufv2-sin1k-12Vrms-4R.png
    130.4 KB · Views: 333
  • LeXaN-Bufv2-sin1k-18Vrms-4R.png
    LeXaN-Bufv2-sin1k-18Vrms-4R.png
    116.6 KB · Views: 349
Yes, the 100Hz problem also disappeared. I soldered 150R directly to the mosfet gate and 51R is on the pcb (200R total). Besides that I also put 100R+47pF zobel between D and G, see picture.
 

Attachments

  • mosfet-gate-stopper.jpg
    mosfet-gate-stopper.jpg
    491.2 KB · Views: 263
🙂:up:
Congratulations! The IRFPs do not like longer legs!
Have you tried to short circuit the 0.1R resistors R37 and R38 (schematic post #63).
I have used 150R gate resistors as close to gate as possible. (see picture in post #1408).

AFAICS you are using only one MOSFET per rail so current sharing is not a problem. Should better the THD a little bit.

BR, Toni
 
Last edited: