LED Projector (YES YOU CAN!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
throwit said:
hey there Just In KY 2002

thanks for that link, those leds look the business, but what do you make of 4chip - are there four element thingies in each led ?

There are basically 4 LED elements in 1 housing, so yes.

In my latest setup, I am using both the 4chips leds and some narrow viewing angle LEDs. The combination of both of these helps to sharpen the picture.

Narrow-----------------Narrow



-------------4chips--------------



Narrow-----------------Narrow


I am now using around 110 4chips, and 150 of the narrow viewing angle.

I also found that the direction you place the led ( : . . ) will actually change the sharpness of the pixels as well. I am placing the narrow angle LEDs up and down : and the 4chips sideways . . .

I'll let you all know if I change again.


I'v also thought of a way to light evenly. I have some 3/4 inch plexiglass that a local hockey rink threw out. If I was to cut 1 inch strips of this, and stack them across the back of the LCD, I could then put the LED board behind and light it. I havent messed with this idea at all yet, but might in the future.
 
sorry Cordie, i can't help much with that, i'm not sure anyone else will be able to either 'cos your question could do with elaborating on






davidcw has found this company called luminus...

luminus

luminus products

some interesting stuff going on there

matt
 

Attachments

  • phlatlight lum_chip2_185_pixels.jpg
    phlatlight lum_chip2_185_pixels.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 669
Man, there's some good stuff going on here! Have to come here more often again!

I was looking at the LED spot light diagram posted by Cordie. Good idea, but won't work like you think it would. First, the focal point for the fresnel is exactly behind the lens (not off to the side). Aside from that, I've read fresnels have a useful angle of about 30 degrees. Anything more than that and the light gets scattered / useless.

But branching off of that idea, how about a prism? Take 3 light sources (all whites or R, G, and B) and place them at the appropriate "input" of the prism. Place the prism's "output" at the focal length of the fresnel. This could give you approx 3x the brightness.
 
Whoa cool Idea superdave.

I agree theres lots of cool stuff going on, Ive been away too long also 🙂.

glad to see you still at it throwit, Im heading back to the western world earlier than originally planned so I will be building my first led array sometime next month.
 
Thanks stelleg151. The prism idea isn't anything new. The concept is used on higher end projectors. But I think it could be a good way to control the coloring of the final image and you should be able to put 3 times the amount of LEDs into the same light path. Just a theory. 🙂
 
Hi there,

it would be great if the retrofitting of LEDs in a commercial projector would turn out in a success. It's all about running costs and convenience (size, quality). I think actual leds are capable of making 100lumens to the projection screen, and that's not a bad figure if the result is compact, good picture quality, low noise and consumption, coupled with basically no need for replacement. That's the major turn down of commercial units.

About the route to be taken I find using LEDs of the three primary colours the best choice. They can even sit directly behind each screen, with the polarizers in between, thus dumping all those mirrors. That may make collimation easier. But careful with those tiny 3 LCDs and the quadro prism, I suspect the arrangement is very sensitive to misalignments.

The quadro prism is a very interesting optical piece. I am not sure how it works though, how it manages to superimpose the 3 images. If each prism would only let pass towards the lens and reflect it the otherwa,y it would do, but is that it? It would be like a light valve, and I'm not sure they exist. Or is the principle related to different wavelengths and/or refraction indexes?

I found a formula for translating those pesky mcd and beam angle to actual lumen output of the led. You may find it of use:

2*pi*sin b*(1-cos b)* i

b=half the beam angle
i=rated intensity in cd

Actually the lumen output is limited by this value, but in most cases 80% of it should be quite accurate with the useful lumen output.

For example, the leds on ebay with 30deg and 150000mcd give a lm output of 8.3lm at best, more likely 6.5 lm. Not bad vs their size and power.

I have a RPTV lens myself, and I am in the process of finding a good small TFT (hard to find, any suggestions, VGA 5-6"?) using the computer CRT meanwhile, as image source!
 
The biggest problem with high powered LED's is the higher fade rate they endure thoughout their life span. I see this happen in Cinema equipment all the time and LED fade is pretty much what killed Sony's SDDS digital sound system. Also the reflector it will require to obtain even light will be dificult if not impossible to design. I doubt that direct lighting of the LCD panels will be adaquate. Any array of LED's is going to have very uneven areas between the LED's. This is easy to see when looking at the video output of a SONY SDDS CCD camera or a Dolby Digital film reader camera..... Lots of spikes in the waveform from all the dead spots between the LED's in the arrays.

Also, your LED's will generate a fair amount of heat that has to be removed to be able to get any decent life span out of them!!

Mark
 
RGB leds behind 3LCDs

They actually did just that: http://www.handtops.com/forum/1606/10//LED_Projectors_by_Mitsubishi_Samsung_an.html

Notice the leds aren't very energy efficient.

Sony is also said to have developed a special screen, black to natural light but white to RGB, making day viewing feasible.
 
Leds promise much

Although current leds are less economical than discharge lamps it looks like in the near future it will be the other way: a manufacturer demonstrated a white LED with 131lm/W!

http://www.cree.com/press/press_detail.asp?i=1150834953712

Some >1000cd/m2 lcds and ready made led backlights

http://www.litemax.com.tw/tec_led_e.htm

On the other hand I can't find a small tft panel with enough resolution for a good price. I found a relatively cheap brand new 3LCD projector with good resolution though, and if retrofitting leds isn't very difficult it would be a nice "complete kit" (Viewsonic PJ452, XGA, 600$). 3LCD seems to lose less light vs DLP. So how hard is it to make a commercial projector work without its proprietary lamp? throwit, any progress?
 
Thanks, there's so much information here sometimes it's easier to just ask😉
After reading those last posts it is still unclear if the shortcircuit trick worked for your model as well.

Modding a commercial proj seems increasingly appealing, albeit not so true to diy, I found a 515$ brand new model, only WXGA though. If they get cheaper still, there will truly remain just the hardcore diy-ers to take the build from scratch route. But I guess modding one isn't total betrayal.
 
i really think it's working !!!

an hour and a half now, and seemingly normal lp250 operation, except for the lack of heat and light !

shining a bright torch in the light engine opening reveals a murky but changing image on my palm in front of the lens

😀 😀 😀


the two terminals marked by OzOne in red, or the corresponding wires need to be linked together, then the lamp psu/ballast can be removed and not needed
 

Attachments

  • lp240 and lp250 short circuit.jpg
    lp240 and lp250 short circuit.jpg
    63.9 KB · Views: 510
I don't know if this company has been mentioned, yet, but I posted this information on the Big Screen Forums.

Take a look at this site, Goldeneye Inc.
For those that don't RTFA 😀, here's what it says:
Generating 1500 ANSI lumens in combined red, green and blue from a 2x4 mm light source, Goldeneyeª LED-based devices are easily bright enough to replace the arc lamps currently used in projection displays that use DLP, LCD or LCOS technology. Arc lamps have many undesirable properties, including short lifetimes, slow startup, lack of color control, high bulb pressures and the use of mercury. LED light sources eliminate these problems while increasing color saturation and eliminating replacement bulb expense.

In explaining their technology (there isn't much), their "Recycling Optics" pdf says, in part,
...the light-recycling cavity is in the shape of a cube. The inside surfaces of five sides of the cube are partially covered by LEDs that emit light directed toward the center of the cube. The sixth side of the cube is constructed from a highly reflective material that has an output aperture. The inside surfaces of the cube that are not covered by the LEDs are also covered by a highly reflective material. Light only exits the cavity through the output aperture.

Seems to hold a lot of promise.
Too bad there isn't anything on the shelf to purchase, as they don't have anything to show for it, yet. But, at least, they and others are working on the problem.

regards,
MAJ
 
hi OzOnE

this is the reply to your post at ywhs' thread !

...those leds arrived some time ago, but as with many things ebay, the description and the reality aren't comparable - there's no way they're as bright as suggested, but a luxeon should really give out in the region of 100lm per led, so say you get 1000lm +/- per 40mmx40mm, and you remove unnecessary obstacles in the light path, and achieve 40% efficiency (up from 15% to 25%), you've got yourself a 400lm@lens pj there mister !

if you look at led:yes you can page 3 and led:yes you can page 4 , you'll see the kinda solutions i've thought of, i had considered a 'reverse eye' like the goldeneye in the beginning, but i know of a better way (which i'd prefer to keep under my hat) but i don't think it'll be necessary to go as far as that...time'll tell


price and availability may be an issue, but these are interesting, very interesting

🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.