John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that power dissipation in resistors can be important, especially with feedback resistors, but I would not put 20 in series in order to balance the dissipation. Just use a large enough resistor for the main feedback resistor (out to input), larger than the very minimum, and use a quality 1% Dale or equivalent resistor. That is what I use. Rely on thermal capacitance primarily, rather than thermal resistance.
Richard: I was looking back through some 80's TAA mags, and there you were!

JAM has all my back issues and will make copies of each for me soon. A lot of the material and books were not able to ship to my new home in Bangkok. Cost to ship are just too high. When he copies all, we will be able to show more info to others. I had a creative spell back then and afterwards got too involved in my career and making money to write any more. But, I have always been interested in music thus audio.


-Richard
 
Last edited:
Tourny,

If you place the 20 resistors side by side (JN technique) and then have the connection essentially zig zag the the inductance will be reduced. That yields the best result. I would use the Dale metal film resistors. The power rating of the stack should be at least four times what the actual peak dissipation could be.

Another issue is that the value of the single resistor should be equal to the resistor on the source input side of a differential pair.

Some here would try the input side resistance as high as 100,000 ohms. I would use 10,000 ohms. With a normal 20/1 attenuator that would make the feedback resistor 200,000 ohms.
Even with 1/10 watt power rating of some surface mount resistors that would allow your power supply rails to be several hundred volts!

JC would probably prefer a lower resistance value to avoid the effects of stray capacitance and as he uses a DC servo matching resistances on both sides of the differential pair is not as important.
 
Tourny,

If you place the 20 resistors side by side (JN technique) and then have the connection essentially zig zag the the inductance will be reduced. That yields the best result. I would use the Dale metal film resistors. The power rating of the stack should be at least four times what the actual peak dissipation could be.

Another issue is that the value of the single resistor should be equal to the resistor on the source input side of a differential pair.

Some here would try the input side resistance as high as 100,000 ohms. I would use 10,000 ohms. With a normal 20/1 attenuator that would make the feedback resistor 200,000 ohms.
Even with 1/10 watt power rating of some surface mount resistors that would allow your power supply rails to be several hundred volts!

JC would probably prefer a lower resistance value to avoid the effects of stray capacitance and as he uses a DC servo matching resistances on both sides of the differential pair is not as important.
Nice idea: Surface mount in zig-zag serial look, indeed, a good option.
The inductance is reduced, the voltage on each as well.
My question is general. But in, my particular case, I'm in the worse situation: It is a CFA: 750 Ohms serial. ~30dB gain.

Why 4X the peak dissipation ? There is ~10db of dynamic margin VS average musical level and it is a ~200W amplifier. I doubt it will be used at full power. So I thought just the resistances have to survive at a DC rail if one power device burn in short circuit. Am-I wrong ?
 
Last edited:
You should always trust and follow those famous designers :rofl:.
Sorry, It is not because I 'listen' as much as I measure that i'm a believer or a snobbish. I just try to be open minded. When something do not look stupid, I verify if I can hear an 'obvious' difference.
Somebody, long time ago, was trying to "sell" me those magical cones under amplifiers.
So I recorded my amp with a tone and hitted-it with a hammer. Nothing, end of the story. But it was not impossible, in my mind, that some components should be microphonic.

About magnetic effects in power amps, the position of the output coil is measurable.

And, may-be, a difference between aluminium and steel enclosures, but I never tried a comparison. Do-you have an opinion ?
Or do-you think everything sound the same, topologies, fet VS bipolar in inputs and output stages, capacitances etc ?

Et pourquoi tant de haine ?
 
Last edited:
Nice idea: Surface mount in zig-zag serial look, indeed, a good option.
The inductance is reduced, the voltage on each as well.
My question is general. But in, my particular case, I'm in the worse situation: It is a CFA: 750 Ohms serial. ~30dB gain.

Why 4X the peak dissipation ? There is ~10db of dynamic margin VS average musical level and it is a ~200W amplifier. I doubt it will be used at full power. So I thought just the resistances have to survive at a DC rail if one power device burn in short circuit. Am-I wrong ?

******* use 3 of these WNE250FET Ohmite | Mouser Canada in series and be done with it. Saves space, money, they are non inductive, 20ppm/C temperature coefficient, and wire wound resistors have virtually zero voltage coefficient.

Yes, I know, I just spoiled your fun :rofl:.
 
Resistors have shunt capacitance as well as inductance and at 10K the cap dominates. It seems they tend to balance ot around 100 Ohms but nothing is guaranteed. If you are looking for precision you do want a pretty high power resistor divider and if the ratios can work the nonlinearities "may" cancel or they may add. My AC calibrator uses a 5W Vishay foil in its feedback to meet the performance requirements for 10V.

The photos are high voltage precision dividers showing some of what is involved to get accuracy for HV AC. The better ones I have seen spiral the resistors as you can see.
 

Attachments

  • HV divider.PNG
    HV divider.PNG
    754.4 KB · Views: 217
  • HV divider -2.PNG
    HV divider -2.PNG
    36.2 KB · Views: 236
Status
Not open for further replies.