Incorrect. science is pretty much the opposite of a belief system, it's a process and a set of tools, in that *everything* should be tested and verified, not taken as given. There is nothing taken as a given.
Yes, the IMES is lab size. I do only design and it helps to put an FPGA on a prototype
board. My customers have the production machines, all vapour phase with
placement robots.
Galden as a liquid and as vapour is harmless. It is the industry standard for
quality soldering.
But if you overheat the vapour so much that it starts decomposing chemically, then
you better run.
So the oven must be temperature-limited to safe levels by design. And there also
must be enough liquid Galden above the heater. That limits the working temperature
to the typ. 240°C required for leadless solder. The board does not get hotter than this,
but the condensing vapour makes sure that the required temp. is reached everywhere.
There is a lot of energy absorbed and set free at the boiling point.
Compare that to the typ. 370°C used for hand soldering or the ill-defined
temperature for infra-dead. The Chips are usually black and the leads are
metallic-reflective. Just the opposite from that what's required for stress free
soldering. What the thermometer shows has not much to do with the
solder joints.
have a nice Sunday,
Gerhard
Last edited:
Yes, who cares about the proposed explanations, the important part is that according the researchers the effects described were consistent and repeatable....the implications of this research are immense.
We are moving into 5G age of blanket coverage of mm wave radiations and already people are reporting adverse effects.....IMO (and not just mine) this is of great concern and the biophysical reasons need to be discovered and remedy or prevention implemented.
Dan.
.
I’ll be sure not to shorten them any more than I have to when I cut the connector off. And will leave the zobel alone.
Since you assert that the universe is not rationally explicable, how do you go and use the process and tools to do science? 😀
Sorry Dan, explanations of creating entangled particles can be found in numerous scientific journals. Shining a laser pointer through a bottle of water with aspirin dissolved in it does not create entangled photons. This stuff reads like Machina Dynamica or Bybee copy.
Ummmm, that's why I said who cares about their theories, the important part is their experimental findings.
If the explanation is not to do with 'quantum entanglement ' then what is the mechanism explaining the experimental findings ?.
Also what is quantum entanglement really.......resonance coupling/phase locking/energy transfer at a distance ?......or what ?.
Dan.
If the explanation is not to do with 'quantum entanglement ' then what is the mechanism explaining the experimental findings ?.
Also what is quantum entanglement really.......resonance coupling/phase locking/energy transfer at a distance ?......or what ?.
Dan.
Interesting then that the wires on one set are 1.5” longer....about 20% longer than the total length of the shorter set......apparently they didn’t get the memo in Taiwan?
What you describe is not science, more like the electric universe crack pots (Aussies IIRC 🙂).
Last edited:
You guys are talking past each other, fyi. Both what you and DF96 write is correct and complementary.
Under the hood of every theory we have is "we believe this is the way it works", which gets tested and tested again to a point where this belief is essentially proven, but unless somehow we manage to sample the entire universe (or truly whatever it is), there's no way for us to say that there are no exceptions to the rules we make.
Semantic difference in practice, but nonetheless a real one. 🙂
True... But people referring to science as a belief IME are often at the next step saying "so it's not so different from any other belief" (I don't put DF96 in that group). Which is wrong, as most beliefs are not tested, etc. The problem is the word "belief" carries a lot of baggage - more so over there than here... eg...
Ark Encounter - Wikipedia
Ark Encounter - Wikipedia
I think people choose to believe in things that make sense to them, ie. they have "tested" them to their own satisfaction.
In everyday life I shake my head and roll my eyes more than I believe I should......probably much like y’all do when I post. 😛
Sure but the problem arises when some of those people are unable or unwilling to distinguish the difference between anecdote and evidence.
Nobody will seriously look into these, unless you or anybody else can show reliable experimental findings (meaning, relevant data of a reproducible experiment). Your prose does not qualify, therefore the only ones jumping in are crackpot scientists.
It's more likely that it was just written off as wire parasitics. I wonder if anyone here knows how to find an objective target for the parasitic pi filter or if it is all just guesswork and rule of thumb.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.