The REAL problem with audio is MARKETING! They are the people who, when they get something that proves to be popular, make the BIG MONEY.
Even advanced test equipment salesmen can make BIG MONEY, if they have the right personality, and I suspect more than the actual designers of the test equipment.
Even advanced test equipment salesmen can make BIG MONEY, if they have the right personality, and I suspect more than the actual designers of the test equipment.
John,
On this I can agree with you that this is not an easy business to make an honest dollar for the work involved in bringing a product to market. You only have to look at the consumer market to see what happens. Do any of us really think that the Dr. Dre headphones are worth anywhere near the price or that this company should be a dominant player in the industry? It is all celebrity driven and marketing money that has created this monster, not a quality product for the price. Selling a superior product will not guarantee success, it takes more than a great product these days to make a honest living.
On this I can agree with you that this is not an easy business to make an honest dollar for the work involved in bringing a product to market. You only have to look at the consumer market to see what happens. Do any of us really think that the Dr. Dre headphones are worth anywhere near the price or that this company should be a dominant player in the industry? It is all celebrity driven and marketing money that has created this monster, not a quality product for the price. Selling a superior product will not guarantee success, it takes more than a great product these days to make a honest living.
or car fuel consumption reduction devices.
Something wrong with that also LOL
For less than $30 I reduced the fuel consumption with 35% and increased torque by the same percentage ;-)
Standard the car had full acceleration up to 140 km/h, after up to 180 km/h..
For additional $600 I got another 20% increase in torque and full acceleration up to 200 km/h..
No electronics - only pure metal parts...
True.Kindhornman said:Selling a superior product will not guarantee success
Selling an inferior product will not guarantee failure.
Calling a significant number of people in the audio business, either ignorant or dishonest...
Only in the fashion audio sector. People working at mainstream companies offering honest product are generally pretty competent.
Much depends on how success is defined.Selling a superior product will not guarantee success
I'll bet in x number of years Dr. Dre will be a trivia question and Koss will still be making headphones.
Somehow I don't think Dr. Dre will call that a failure when they're laughing all the way to the bank 😉
jan
jan
"A man's got to know his limitations" Eastwood- A Man's Got to Know his Limitations - YouTubeI have only worked in fields where a reasonable degree of competence was a requirement. There was of course a range of abilities among my colleagues.
I have never worked in audio, over-the-counter medicine, or car fuel consumption reduction devices.
Unfortunately we're living through an age where 'in your face', overtarting is the norm. Just look at the current crop of "reality" TV efforts ...Even advanced test equipment salesmen can make BIG MONEY, if they have the right personality, and I suspect more than the actual designers of the test equipment.
"In yer face" has totally taken over here in the large UK cities, TV, comedy, telesales, and even here in quiet rural well mannered Scotland, although less blatent, is catching on as being the new charismatic (I don't think) approach to all personal interactions amongst the younger people. It is repulsive and needs to be stopped pretty quickly....if not, the outcome is inevitable.
Last edited:
Interesting material: Design News - Features - Liquid & Tape Conductive Adhesives for Electrical Interconnection ...
Fas42,
While those materials may be interesting for something like making an RF seal or something on a radome or even some simple contact circuit I would say the electrical impedance of these types of conductive adhesives would have no use in an audio circuit. These types of material can never have enough conductive material added to the adhesive and still function as an adhesive or a tape.
While those materials may be interesting for something like making an RF seal or something on a radome or even some simple contact circuit I would say the electrical impedance of these types of conductive adhesives would have no use in an audio circuit. These types of material can never have enough conductive material added to the adhesive and still function as an adhesive or a tape.
I'm interested in making gastight electrical connections, and adhesive material mixed with the conductive may be the answer in some cases. I've played with silver-filled liquids on a number of occasions, and have found them to be the most effective solution quite often.
Look at MIL-C-5015 type connectors, or aerospace connectors, there are plenty out there without having to re-invent the wheel. I would have to ask why for use in the benign domestic environment...
Power Frequencies Matter....
Recently I bought one of these via Ebay.
Kikusui PCR-500L AC/DC variable voltage, variable frequency power supply.
http://www.kikusui.co.jp/kiku_manuals/P/PCR_L_E7.PDF
It puts out 0-300V AC, 1Hz-999Hz, 500VA at 0.3% THD, or 0-420V DC, or AC with DC offset, or DC with AC ripple !.
An experiment I have wanted to try since forever is to run musically related power frequencies and hear what happens....now I can. 😛
Preliminary findings so far, confirming suspicion is that neither 50Hz or 60Hz are actually ideal on gear with less than perfect power supply/earthing arrangements.
Switching to 55Hz causes an immediately subjective cleansing of the sound, reducing a veil of intermods and harshness.
Bass gains solidarity and 'correctness', mids lose harshness, highs gain extension.
This is on active speakers fed by directly USB soundcard (Edirol UA-25ex).
Of course this is probably not revelatory news to advocates of high quality DC regulation stages and high PSRR stages (JC and others).
Currently I am running clean sinewave output...programming via GPIB interface, this box can output clipped sinewave, sine plus noise, DSO captured waveform or just about any arbitrary waveform, including varying/stepped output voltage, varying/stepped frequency and momentary brownouts/surges.(once I get a USB-GPIB interface cable 🙁)
All in all an interesting and very useful piece of gear for simulating/measuring power quality effects on audio gear.
Dan.
Recently I bought one of these via Ebay.

Kikusui PCR-500L AC/DC variable voltage, variable frequency power supply.
http://www.kikusui.co.jp/kiku_manuals/P/PCR_L_E7.PDF
It puts out 0-300V AC, 1Hz-999Hz, 500VA at 0.3% THD, or 0-420V DC, or AC with DC offset, or DC with AC ripple !.
An experiment I have wanted to try since forever is to run musically related power frequencies and hear what happens....now I can. 😛
Preliminary findings so far, confirming suspicion is that neither 50Hz or 60Hz are actually ideal on gear with less than perfect power supply/earthing arrangements.
Switching to 55Hz causes an immediately subjective cleansing of the sound, reducing a veil of intermods and harshness.
Bass gains solidarity and 'correctness', mids lose harshness, highs gain extension.
This is on active speakers fed by directly USB soundcard (Edirol UA-25ex).
Of course this is probably not revelatory news to advocates of high quality DC regulation stages and high PSRR stages (JC and others).
Currently I am running clean sinewave output...programming via GPIB interface, this box can output clipped sinewave, sine plus noise, DSO captured waveform or just about any arbitrary waveform, including varying/stepped output voltage, varying/stepped frequency and momentary brownouts/surges.(once I get a USB-GPIB interface cable 🙁)
All in all an interesting and very useful piece of gear for simulating/measuring power quality effects on audio gear.
Dan.
Of course this is probably not revelatory news to advocates of high quality DC regulation stages and high PSRR stages (JC and others).
Well, that would be me, but if it's actually true, it would be revelatory news. How have you verified that this remarkable observation is correct?
I suspect that if all mains equipment ran at 55hz that the same test would indicate that 50 or 60hz sounded best.
Hi Dan,
Nice piece of kit, good to see you are putting your money where your ears are.
Much interested in further results. I hope you will be able to objectify your findings by doing some controlled listening tests.
One question I have is about your suspicion that 55 Hz would be better than 50 or 60. What is the reasoning behind this? I can imagine that a marginally designed transformer with a core that saturates @50Hz might benefit from more cycles per second. But why would 55 be better than 60 Hz?
Nice piece of kit, good to see you are putting your money where your ears are.
Much interested in further results. I hope you will be able to objectify your findings by doing some controlled listening tests.
One question I have is about your suspicion that 55 Hz would be better than 50 or 60. What is the reasoning behind this? I can imagine that a marginally designed transformer with a core that saturates @50Hz might benefit from more cycles per second. But why would 55 be better than 60 Hz?
Not Interested In Any ABX Arguments For Now....
Testing regime for now is sighted testing with one other person present...we both expressed the changes in the same ways.
No blind testing yet...that will follow when I get a GPIB interface.
Another observation is that US (60Hz supply) recordings sound slightly less bad with 60Hz supply than with 50Hz supply.
I find also that the converse is true...I have always found AUS/European recordings sound subtly more correct with my local 50Hz mains than do US recordings.
110Hz sounds good, 100Hz and 120Hz sounds less good also.
Just some preliminary informal findings so far, maybe a heads up for some.
Actually it confirms justification for very high performance regulator stages, power amp capacitance multiplier power supply stages and importance of correct earthing arrangements.
These factors are typically to be found wanting in 'average' audio gear.
Dan.
I'm saying that power frequency injected hum, ripple, etc is discernible on sub-optimal gear.....it's a modulation in addition to the audio modulation = intermodulation.Well, that would be me, but if it's actually true, it would be revelatory news. How have you verified that this remarkable observation is correct?
Testing regime for now is sighted testing with one other person present...we both expressed the changes in the same ways.
No blind testing yet...that will follow when I get a GPIB interface.
Another observation is that US (60Hz supply) recordings sound slightly less bad with 60Hz supply than with 50Hz supply.
I find also that the converse is true...I have always found AUS/European recordings sound subtly more correct with my local 50Hz mains than do US recordings.
110Hz sounds good, 100Hz and 120Hz sounds less good also.
Just some preliminary informal findings so far, maybe a heads up for some.
Actually it confirms justification for very high performance regulator stages, power amp capacitance multiplier power supply stages and importance of correct earthing arrangements.
These factors are typically to be found wanting in 'average' audio gear.
Dan.
Thanks, Dan, it will be interesting to see your results in the testing round. That's a very nice piece of gear that you scored!
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II