I don't believe cables make a difference, any input?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi,



I think wire really needs to be drawn in a very odd way to make it even remotely directional.
If cable were that directional just hooking up some to both channels randomly could mess up the stereo image. Does it?

Frankly, I just think that's one of those audio myths
Just my opinion though.


Cheers, 😉

Hi Frank,

I was thinking of picking a brand that was already claimed to be "obviously" directional. Sort of one where the participant has already verified in their own mind that it is indeed directional. I think they are all audio myths myself.
 
Hi,

Scott,

Not sure what JC replied to. I guess it's about that DBT test though.

To me, wire directionality is something that could be caused by the way the bare wire is drawn/or pushed through the die.
The effect, if any, could or could not be audible but I've never met anyone able to point to a wire connected backwards and asking for it to be reversed. Never.
I think the effect of just unplugging and replugging a cable into a system is greater than the assumed audibility of a preferred direction.

Furthermore I think lots of people confuse directionality of wire (as in bare wire) with the preferred direction of a shielded piece of cable.

I do recall some cable manufacturers (one that have a vested interest) claiming their goods to be directional, wire and finished cable) due to the way it was made.
I still have some of that cable and I can't say I hear any difference either way.
I don't think it sounded al that great either no matter how expensive it was.

BTW, don't know if you remember Steve Eddy's directionality contest but I particpated in it.
Those were just a couple of inches of enemalled, or was it Kapton, insulated wires of what seemed to be above average quality. Phelps-Dodge sourced, I guess.

Anyways, I wouldn't waste too much time on it.


Cheers, 😉
 
Last edited:
I'd be happy with that. And it raises a good point about the burnt not-burnt test, because Andre can hear both effects, if a burnt not-burnt test is done, the cables supplied would have to be marked for directionality.

We tried this a few years ago. The assertive fellow who called the rationalists deaf, closed-minded, and insensitive disappeared as soon as the test was ready to begin. Sic transit gloria Mr. Feedback.
 
Posted by john curl

Stick it, Scott. You know my position on this. AND how would I know that these cables are typically directional?

If not all wires are directional and the alleged differences in "directional" wires are due to how it is manufactured, than wouldn't a wire's "non-directionality" indicate it is less defective then the directional wire?

Also curious, if wires are directional, and AC current is not, how does directional wire do anything more than filter off DC offset?

Eric
 
Wait- you're saying that if you just use your ears and don't peek, the music changes timbre? Wow, the excuse bag must really be running on empty.

Well, how long has John been at it? Changing things, measuring things, listening, making mistakes? How long has he been actively training himself?

This is interesting. Listen to 6, 7 & 8. No17 is relevant also:

FORA.tv - Jonah Lehrer: How We Decide

When faced with judging and discriminating complex data, (and I think reproduced sound is complex - lots and lots of variables to consider), we don't and can't rely on consciously logical subjective activity. We have to go with "feelings" and apparently vague attributions. How did the guy know they were missiles and not planes?

I'm sure John can hear some things I can't and can reliably attribute them to specific causes. Whether or not he can always spot musical differences due to say, speaker cables, I don't know. I'd think he probably can, sometimes, at a rate better than chance.

I don't have a dog in the fight. I've never worried about the wire, but I'm a fanatic about really, really, really, really, solid connections at each end.😉
 
Hi,

Posted by john curl



If not all wires are directional and the alleged differences in "directional" wires are due to how it is manufactured, than wouldn't a wire's "non-directionality" indicate it is less defective then the directional wire?

Also curious, if wires are directional, and AC current is not, how does directional wire do anything more than filter off DC offset?

Eric

Keep'em coming and we'll end up with a Wheatstone bridge....😱

Cheers, 😉
 
I would like to point out that when audio designers refer to quality wire, we don't mean something that is normally found at the hardware store, or the Belden or Alpha catalog.
We might think of Mogami as a good start, but there is better out there.
Once, I was sent some cable for a comparison like this. They were not BAD cables, in fact, they measured better than some more expensive cables that I had around. They were therefore bad subjects for comparison, because there wasn't much different about them. If I wanted to find differences, I looked into some of the cheapest and some of the most expensive wires, to find the real odd balls, that actually had a fair amount of harmonic distortion (compared to many others). It would be the same here. Trying to compare directionality in a random wire, might well be useless, YET with another cable type, very useful.
 
If I wanted to find differences, I looked into some of the cheapest and some of the most expensive wires, to find the real odd balls, that actually had a fair amount of harmonic distortion (compared to many others).

What "fair amount of harmonic distortion," John?

A variety of cables were measured, including some of the very same cables that you have measured, on a measurement system significantly better than yours and looking 20dB below where you were capable of measuring, and there was no harmonic distortion.

The only distortion seen was the residual distortion of Bruno Putzey's Audio Precision System Two Cascade.

Clearly whatever distortion you were looking at wasn't being produced by the cables.

se
 
Status
Not open for further replies.