Hypothesis as to why some prefer vinyl: Douglas Self

Status
Not open for further replies.
Without wishing to stray too far OT, but thinking about things that are not there, one of the problems for those not willing to splash out for the likes of the AT150Mlx is that there is a distinct resonant peak around 16KHz. Some attempts have been made to come up with a better MM stage, but nothing to deal with the high frequency problems. One could argue that MC has won the hi-fi race, but looking at it dispassionately MM/MI should be a better solution if you get the interfacing right. Deep dive is another topic, but worth considering in a discussion of 21st century vinyl interfacing...

[/offtopic]
 
Definately !

I'm sure that JLH did something on this subject, but can't seem to remember where/when; possibly in 'the Gramophone' or have I imagined it ?

The only one that comes immediately to mind is a design from "Modular Preamplifier Part 2" in Wireless World Nov 82. It uses no known filter structure.

It has a 0.6 dB peak before turnover, and has a response sagging unhappily by 1dB between 60 and 200Hz. It claims to be 3rd-order but the slope is only 12dB/octave below 20 Hz.

I'm afraid it is a typical JLH filter 'design'.
 
Thanks, for that.

I've have found a JLH article, with a brief mention of rumble filters, attached (hopefully)
 

Attachments

  • TG-Mar71-p1.jpg
    TG-Mar71-p1.jpg
    338.6 KB · Views: 257
  • TG-Mar71-p2.jpg
    TG-Mar71-p2.jpg
    267.2 KB · Views: 254
Barley
Horizontal motion of the stylus reads the in-phase signal.
If you add the two stereo channels you are effectively reading the horizontal motion.

Vertical motion of the stylus reads the out of phase signal and also the difference between the two channels.
If you subtract the two stereo channels you are effectively reading the vertical motion.

Ignoring noise, if you have two identical signals in the groove, then you have ONLY horizontal motion of the stylus. There will be no vertical motion and the difference signal will be zero (except for that noise).
 
A+B = horizontal motion and A-B = vertical motion. This is ridiculous. To see this, just think about applying this to two arbitrary signals. What does this methodology tell you when applied to a CD or tape?

If low frequencies are recorded in mono, then A+B delivers a few dB improvement of S/N for low frequencies. This requires foreknowledge of how record is made.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.