Horn vs. Waveguide

Status
Not open for further replies.
badman said:
That is indeed a very cool site. The driver openings appear to be 1.4" and 1.75" respectively for the two horns though, which changes my usage (I was thinking of using a JBL 2426H)

Any adaptor is naturally going to compromise the throat geometry.

I am sure those measurements are for the voice coil and not the exit aperture. The 1.75" (44 mm) looks to be a standard 1" bolt-on diver.

The 1.4" is also a 1" bolt-on driver (apparently from Celestion), but the two-bolt pattern is backwards from standard. ie. you thread into the horn, not into the driver.

[edit] .... oooohhhh, beaten to the punch!
 
Re: Re: Where to get the QSC?

ZilchLab said:


Why do we suspect the JBL waveguide is "dogboned" at the sides?

I guess augerpro's measurements will tell us. He has both the JBL and the QSC. I like the looks of the QSC. We'll see how good my 'engineering eyeball' is and whether I wasted my 72 bucks (won't be the first time). 😉
 
Re: Re: Re: Where to get the QSC?

catapult said:


I guess augerpro's measurements will tell us.

I believe it will be revealed in the oblique.


Earl Geddes at gedlee.com said:


The first two plots are the horizontal polars. The next two are the vertical polars and the last two are an an oblique angle of about 45°. Rectangular horns often have poor response along this oblique angle.

The JBL actually outperformed the ESP12 at this angle in some significant respects:
 

Attachments

  • geddes econwave oblique.jpg
    geddes econwave oblique.jpg
    91.1 KB · Views: 626
Re: Re: Re: Re: Where to get the QSC?

ZilchLab said:

I believe it will be revealed in the oblique.

The JBL actually outperformed the ESP12 at this angle in some significant respects:

Well, we'll see how the QSC does. MY WAG theory is that most 'rectangular horns' have a problem on the oblique because they are using two different methods of pattern control for the horizontal and the vertical. I don't see why it should be a problem if there's a nice smooth 'waveguide' transition from round throat to rectangular body. But I've been wrong before. Whatever, the JBL is too small and cuts off too high for my taste. I'm looking for something to use with a 15" like the AE TD15M. Size matters. 😉
 
catapult said:
What's the throat size on that jumbo version? Do they make one a little less jumbo? 😉

That's 1.5" shown, but it also comes in 1". Less than $150 each, either variant.

Smaller? 2352 biradial is available for weenies. 😎

Actually, the PTs will play surprisingly low (~800 Hz) with large-format (4" diaphragm) throatless drivers, though I haven't assessed pattern control down there. We've moved out of the "Econo" realm with this, however.... :xeye:
 
Duh and doubleduh

MartinQ said:


I am sure those measurements are for the voice coil and not the exit aperture. The 1.75" (44 mm) looks to be a standard 1" bolt-on diver.

The 1.4" is also a 1" bolt-on driver (apparently from Celestion), but the two-bolt pattern is backwards from standard. ie. you thread into the horn, not into the driver.

[edit] .... oooohhhh, beaten to the punch!


Hahahaha, why is it that when I'm smart I get so much less attention than when I have a brainfart?

In any case, adapting these to the 2426 (which, being the quality of driver it is, I'd really like to use) is going to be problematic. Since the mounting bracket can be removed for screw-on horn usage, I'm going to give that a try with Zlich's econo waveguide 🙂

Having a solid crossover to start with doesn't hurt, nor does the presence of bass cabinets under construction that would mate perfectly 😀

I'm also playing with casting throats for an OS waveguide and I have the throat geometry pretty well worked out, I just need to get the large conical section figured out, and how to blend the two..... Suffice it to say I may have found a solution to our challenge with OS manufacture. I'd not mind the geddes units, but the cost is high (though fair, given the limited market and PITA factor).
 
Re: Duh and doubleduh

badman said:


Having a solid crossover to start with doesn't hurt, nor does the presence of bass cabinets under construction that would mate perfectly 😀

Careful, now, the E'Wave crossover is optimized for the Selenium D220Ti driver.

I have shown measurements of how 2426H behaves with that combination, and you have more work to do....
 
gedlee said:
No, of coarse they could have done that had they wanted to. But remember, only the inventor can get a patent. Others can own it but only I could patent it.

There was an error in the original filing that was missed until it was too late to file a "continuation". Thats because it had been shown publicly and the error was not discovered until after the one year lapse.

This probably could have been resolved, I dont know for sure, but JBL saw it as more expense than they had originally expected and bowed out. I could not afford to prosecute it further.

Sure I'm aware of only the inventor getting the patent.
Sounds like you didn't get a provisional patent then?
The year was only with regard to showing it?

Pete B.
 
PB2 said:


Sure I'm aware of only the inventor getting the patent.
Sounds like you didn't get a provisional patent then?
The year was only with regard to showing it?

Pete B.

A Provisional application wouldn't have changed anything.

The year thing is only in the US. There was never any possibility of a patent anywhere else since I had already published everything. Initially, I had no intention of patenting the concepts. I was young and nieve and thought that people would give "credit where credit was due". I learned my lesson.
 
I didn't say it would have changed anything just wondering if you used a provisional.

Yes, we all live and learn. I have been through the process and am the inventor on 3 patents held by one of my past employers.

Seems that the patent system mainly works for people/businesses with the funding to pay for the application and to enforce. Big business has corrupted the system. Very little help for the individual inventor.

Pete B.
 
noah katz said:
Patrick,

"I'm trying to decide if it's worth $88 to find out if that will create the "ultimate waveguide", I have an XT1086 sitting here..."

There's a fellow (penngray) at AVS who made the same offer that I did, so it wouldn't cost you anything.

Does anyone know if any of the available horn s/w can analyze axi-asymmetric geometry?

Or import a 3-D shape and analyze?

I could make another (better) plug of the XT1086 and get it digitally scanned.

Noah,

I made a mold out of my XT1086, and then I used bondo to smooth out the kink in the throat. I'll post some pics in this thread soon.

One thing that's a bit of a bummer is that it varies from oblate spheroidal more than I'd realized; it wasn't obvious until I actually created the mold. I have an OS waveguide here, I'll post some pics of both, to show the difference.

Stay tuned...

http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/diy-mobile-audio/60146-creating-perfect-soundstage-3.html
 
Patrick Bateman said:


Noah,

I made a mold out of my XT1086, and then I used bondo to smooth out the kink in the throat. I'll post some pics in this thread soon.

One thing that's a bit of a bummer is that it varies from oblate spheroidal more than I'd realized; it wasn't obvious until I actually created the mold. I have an OS waveguide here, I'll post some pics of both, to show the difference.

Stay tuned...

http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/diy-mobile-audio/60146-creating-perfect-soundstage-3.html

Thank you!!

btw, Im that guy.....I will throw $$ at a great solution.

Im out sourcing reticulating foam now with some companies. If I can get them to mold foam exactly for several waveguides maybe we have something that we can add to our waveguides.

That link is extremely cool, unity horn design???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.