GC Preamp Suggestions

Status
Not open for further replies.
They are to close yes.

Open up BUF634 in library and open device TO220-G5, the pins are 67 mil apart i think. I change that to 75-80 mil i think.

After that open up DRC in "BOARD" and "RESTRING" tab, edit the three "PADS" to something like: "min"=6mil "%"=16%

Then "LIBRARY" -> Update all
 
Just a suggestion

I know that everyone has an idea what is "best" but if you are planning to make a board that will eventually be a group buy it would be nice to have pads for optional components

ideas for optional components.

Output resistor to ground (after series out resistor)

Pads between OPA output and - IN (used for a stabilizing cap or "sub" feedback resistor )
according to Ti data sheet with OPA 627, a 200pf cap must be there

OPA out to -Vs for CRD (a la n00ber)
 
neutron7 said:
Just a suggestion

I know that everyone has an idea what is "best" but if you are planning to make a board that will eventually be a group buy it would be nice to have pads for optional components

ideas for optional components.

Output resistor to ground (after series out resistor)

Pads between OPA output and - IN (used for a stabilizing cap or "sub" feedback resistor )
according to Ti data sheet with OPA 627, a 200pf cap must be there

OPA out to -Vs for CRD (a la n00ber)

Some thing like this neutron7?
Right, time I got to bed :moon:

Thanks again for input

Craig.
 

Attachments

  • pre with ground plane v2.1.png
    pre with ground plane v2.1.png
    27.9 KB · Views: 407
To Tobias : My name is Pavel ( Paul ), the same as PMA have , you are correct 😎. Upupa Epops is latin name of one bird ( in english Hoepoe ), which is my surname ( Dudek ) 😎. And about bypassing : sound of amp make concrete connection and certainly stability by every conditions and loads. Exist only two results - stability and unstability. Every manufacturers recommend to give bypass caps as possible to rails pins, but nobody says, that if you give them far then several mm, circuit will be not functionaly in every cases, it is only Carlos's fanthasy, without any measurable proofs. " Sound of PCB " is funny and very simplify 😉 - but he like simply claiming. Not all is only black or white. 😉
 
neutron7 said:
n00b, icant really see, but it looks like you have the "extra component"

between output of OPA and -supply in parrallel with ur CRD thingy

i meant between output of
OPA and - IN

sorry for confusion.

BTW great job at the out resistors.


Oops! yes you are right, I have updatd my layout, thanks for that
:hphones:

Not your fault neutron7, it will teach me to go to bed on time 😛

I have left out the ground plane to make things easier to see😀

Thanks for the responses guy, much appreciated :angel:
 

Attachments

  • pre with ground plane v2.1.png
    pre with ground plane v2.1.png
    23.6 KB · Views: 488
Upupa Epops said:
Every manufacturers recommend to give bypass caps as possible to rails pins, but nobody says, that if you give them far then several mm, circuit will be not functionaly in every cases, it is only Carlos's fanthasy, without any measurable proofs. " Sound of PCB " is funny and very simplify 😉 - but he like simply claiming. Not all is only black or white. 😉


There are some datasheets that "scratch" this point, you just don't know how to read them.
It seems that you don't understand that most op-amps are not made for AUDIO, and the datasheets reflect this fact.
Your way of designing is good for video or other high frequency signals, but not for MUSIC.
Stable or not stable is not enough, it's a very simplistic way of seeing things.
You really have to LISTEN and compare.
Too many times I didn't replace the op-amps on a circuit, I just bypassed the op-amps in a proper way and the sound improves in a way that even a deaf guy would hear.
Like on a Krell integrated I'm working on now.
Seriously, it plays like a decent amp now (it didn't), starts to justify the original 6,000 euro (!!!!) price.😱

Call it my faltasy if you want, and live in the darkness.:zombie:
 
Upupa Epops said:
To Tobias : My name is Pavel ( Paul ), the same as PMA have , you are correct 😎. Upupa Epops is latin name of one bird ( in english Hoepoe ), which is my surname ( Dudek ) 😎. And about bypassing : sound of amp make concrete connection and certainly stability by every conditions and loads. Exist only two results - stability and unstability. Every manufacturers recommend to give bypass caps as possible to rails pins, but nobody says, that if you give them far then several mm, circuit will be not functionaly in every cases, it is only Carlos's fanthasy, without any measurable proofs. " Sound of PCB " is funny and very simplify 😉 - but he like simply claiming. Not all is only black or white. 😉


carlosfm said:



There are some datasheets that "scratch" this point, you just don't know how to read them.
It seems that you don't understand that most op-amps are not made for AUDIO, and the datasheets reflect this fact.
Your way of designing is good for video or other high frequency signals, but not for MUSIC.
Stable or not stable is not enough, it's a very simplistic way of seeing things.
You really have to LISTEN and compare.
Too many times I didn't replace the op-amps on a circuit, I just bypassed the op-amps in a proper way and the sound improves in a way that even a deaf guy would hear.
Like on a Krell integrated I'm working on now.
Seriously, it plays like a decent amp now (it didn't), starts to justify the original 6,000 euro (!!!!) price.😱

Call it my faltasy if you want, and live in the darkness.:zombie:

OK, you've both made your oppinion and we are very gratefull for that as you are both quite experienced :angel: ........but please just leave it at that, we dont want another one of those threads :whazzat: ...... 😉 🙂 😎
 
OK, you've both made your oppinion and we are very gratefull for that as you are both quite experienced ........but please just leave it at that, we dont want another one of those threads ......
I second that🙂 It is starting to get annoying, that this cr@p is being dragged into other peoples threads. Most of us, have heard all this so many times that we are getting a bit bored😱

Steen.
 
steenoe said:
I second that🙂 It is starting to get annoying, that this cr@p is being dragged into other peoples threads. Most of us, have heard all this so many times that we are getting a bit bored😱

Steen.


😡



I'll "third" that...honestly unless you have something to say that will help improve the design...or at least a pleasent way of expressing another option keep it to yourself. There are lots of ways to design a circut...and nearly as many ways to measure/evaluate them. We won't agree on these all the time but we should certainly keep an open mind.

End of my rant...now back to the preamp design 😉
 
maxw said:
OK, you've both made your oppinion and we are very gratefull for that as you are both quite experienced :angel: ........but please just leave it at that, we dont want another one of those threads :whazzat: ...... 😉 🙂 😎


Thanks, a warning was needed.:angel:
It is always Upupa who starts these discussions, and I was only answering him.
Taking threads off-topic is his speciality.
While I try to help with some suggestions, there always jumps that guy with attacks.
NOTICE: I will always defend myself from childish attacks.
I'm beginning to get tired of all this.
My advice is: stay with him, look at his board and judge.
How can he give good advice with such a lowsy design?

I'm out now, need a rest.
I don't have any necessity to loose my time with this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.