Not likely -- too much volume of material to remove.Could be milled.
Machine fitted and then welded is only other option i can think of. Would seem to debink their whole better thermal transfer theory if there was a gap.
The flange on the Conrad heatsinks is perpendicular to the extrusion direction, therefore it must be a separately attached part. I wonder how it is attached.
Maybe it's all part of the same casting then machined afterward?
Is it possible to do double extrusion? First extrude the fins in one direction, then extrude the flange?
Is it possible to do double extrusion? First extrude the fins in one direction, then extrude the flange?
I believe Conrad heatsinks are sandcast.
If you read the technical specification page it describes it.
''The Conrad flanged single piece heatsink"
''The Conrad flanged single piece heatsink"
You are probably correct. The Conrad "Technical Details" page mentions the CC601 aluminum alloy is used, and CC601 is indeed used for sand casting.I believe Conrad heatsinks are sandcast.
Does anyone have any idea the resistance value of the "white resistor" near the positive side output FET?
I needed a current sensor to bias the circuit, so I put a very low shunt
value in series with the supply. It is not part of the amplifier as such.
😎
I think the transformers took/are taking a long time to get produced...?
I may have cleaned them out, but Jensen often takes a little while.
😎
As we talk about heatsinks here, I have a question not exactly about the amp, but nevertheless: I have a transformer — Antek with a static shield. Where you connect it, to the chassis?
http://www.antekinc.com/pdf/AS-4218.pdf
http://www.antekinc.com/pdf/AS-4218.pdf
I needed a current sensor to bias the circuit, so I put a very low shunt
value in series with the supply. It is not part of the amplifier as such.
😎
Baaad Pa , baaad !

(tnx)
I needed a current sensor to bias the circuit, so I put a very low shunt
value in series with the supply. It is not part of the amplifier as such.
😎
Hi Buzz,
Congratulations, you were right! 😀
And me wrong......
Am I in error in my thinking that with fets like FQA or IRF, that increased die temperature, we get higher conductance? If so, wouldnt there be an advantage to raising fet temp.
Maybe stupid but, is there any way that placing this shunt on the rail would affect THD. It would not alter upper fet response as more current flowed through the circuit?
Maybe stupid but, is there any way that placing this shunt on the rail would affect THD. It would not alter upper fet response as more current flowed through the circuit?
Last edited:
Am I in error in my thinking that with fets like FQA or IRF, that increased die temperature, we get higher conductance? If so, wouldnt there be an advantage to raising fet temp.......
look at pic - my fave IRFP150N ;
I have slight impression ( NB that I'm often completely wrong


Maybe stupid but, is there any way that placing this shunt on the rail would affect THD. It would not alter upper fet response as more current flowed through the circuit?
if talking about small white power resistor in last F6 incarnation , Pa was talking about series connected small valued one ....... same as you puttin' 10R resistor in tube cathode return - convenient place to measure Iq , nothing else
in this case 10mOhm will do the job , having negligible influence to sound/circuit operation
Attachments
Idle minds. ....
you mean - perfect state of mind for ........... F7 ?


Is the cat both dean and alive at the same time? 😀Fortunately I am entangled in other thoughts st the moment.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- F6 Amplifier