F5 power amplifier

I suppose your right
I will try
But I also intend to not be too hysteral about it
Meaning I wont let it lead to other compromises

Im still in doubt about the rail voltage
But I will probably stick to 25V with raised bias

Regarding Jfets
Are you sure that an effective heatsink on each Jfet wont be just as effective
And with each leg connected to solid wire
It should be able to deal with the worst temperature variations
I suppose the constant temperature variations is the problem
If temperature is more stable, DC variations should be less, even if both Jfet are not thermally connected
Just speculation

Anyway, it will be hardwired all through, and "layout" is just an overwiev, and things may change a bit once I start soldering
 

Attachments

  • F5  X6 rev 6x.JPG
    F5 X6 rev 6x.JPG
    69 KB · Views: 1,031
  • F5 supply.jpg
    F5 supply.jpg
    44.1 KB · Views: 1,007
Last edited:
Hi Uriah
Its the simple "paint", nothing special
But yeah, I like it
I think it followed with windows
At first it seems useless
But there are some useful tricks here and there

Let me know if you want to use it
I will tell you the tricks, wont take long

Also useful fore making speaker cutting plans
Just bought a used lazer printer cheap
Black and white, but ok fore simple schematics etc
 

Attachments

  • MIVOC.PNG
    MIVOC.PNG
    38.6 KB · Views: 990
Last edited:
If of any interest, I have made a small change to supply
I was tempted to put in a couple resistors at the last supply cap, fore the Jfet/bias curcuit

But soon realised I better not do that, again
Instead I have "seperated" the last caps with a "thinner" wire
May not matter at all, or may be one of those little things that might make a small difference

btw, supply caps are planned to be BC 22.000uf/40V
 

Attachments

  • F5 supply.JPG
    F5 supply.JPG
    57.1 KB · Views: 880
Last edited:
That's what I thought at first, but after looking at the pictures again the transistors I could spot (which are not located next to each other) are the CCS transistors. I assume the Jfets are hiding back in the picture toward the rca jacks.

At any rate, if it's good enough for him, it's good enough for me. I have the Cviller boards so they are physically close together, but still separated by 1-2mm.
 
If the Jfets are glued into a massive chunk of aluminium, the temperature will just be below that of the inside box, 100% stable, always

I have considered this before, but thought it was much too impractical, in many ways

But the solution is quite simple
Place the Jfets horisontal
Then the massive heatsink can be screw mounted

Oh, yeah, drill a few exstra holes fore future mods, like a cascode
 

Attachments

  • F5 Jfet heatsink.JPG
    F5 Jfet heatsink.JPG
    12.8 KB · Views: 1,176
Last edited:
i made some progress tonight - doin' it the "big dumb way".. 33,000uF Panny UP x4. Panny power resistors. red G-10 board is 3-1/8 by 6-3/4. block rectifiers will flank the board, mounted directly on the chassis bottom.
 

Attachments

  • 010.jpg
    010.jpg
    288.5 KB · Views: 1,077
  • 012.jpg
    012.jpg
    343.8 KB · Views: 1,055
  • 013.jpg
    013.jpg
    424.5 KB · Views: 1,040
Last edited:
I find that the most important details relate to the bandwidth.
The typical - 3dB point is out around 1 MHz, so without
compensation you can see all manner of effects.

Any time there is a question about this possibility, it's helpful
to throw a small capacitor across the feedback resistors and
see if it changes anything.

😎
I had to limmit the bandwith because I got oschillation(uncuntrolled heating)when connected to a DAC via transformers.Anyway I used a 2,2nf across R10 and that stopped the oschillating(heating)but I think I got some less detals after,can the 2,2nf cause that?Should I use a smaller cap to keep out of the hearing area?
 
I had to limmit the bandwith because I got oschillation(uncuntrolled heating)when connected to a DAC via transformers.Anyway I used a 2,2nf across R10 and that stopped the oschillating(heating)but I think I got some less detals after,can the 2,2nf cause that?Should I use a smaller cap to keep out of the hearing area?

Hi Ryssen,

I think R10 is a ground reference, not part of the feedback. To limit the bandwidth the cap needs to be on R5 and R6 (plus R7&R8 if used). Perhaps you can also consider increasing the gate resistors (R9, R13, R14) to see if it fixes the problem? Trimpot might be a friend here. If I'm mistaken (quite possible as my grasp is tenuous) someone please correct me.

Garrett
 
Correct, it is R6-8
I was recommended a cap in the pf range, but to be checked with instrument
I suppose that if you mount the wrong size cap you will just get a "ringing", and still have not dealt with the problem
Isnt 22-100pf often used
100pf is like 0.1nf, right

If you use multiple outputs, its also been adviced to increase R11/12 source resistors to maybe about 1ohm
 
Last edited:
In the manual it says"You can limit frekvency responce by an input capacistor across R10,and allso in the feedbackloop with capasistance across R5 and/or R8,i have choosen not to"

I tried caps across R5 and R8 with no effekt on the problem,cap across R10 had effekt,maybee to much...