Mark,
I wonder why people seem to have a bias against in-wall speakers, perhaps because most of them are poorly designed commercial ones that don't sound good? Unfortunately for me, the wall that I would want to mount speakers "in" is drywall over a brick wall w/o any space in between.
In the response graph you posted, the W5's sensitivity seems to match the tweeter, but, everywhere else I see measurements of the W5 put it anywhere from 85 - 88 db - the tweeter is over 90 db, right?
Was it not convenient for you to post a graph which also shows the individual driver's responses?
I was going to order 4 of the tweeters, but the PE website is down 🙁 I hope they didn't start blocking it on the firewall here at work because the URL has the word "sex" in it - I've seen it blocked some places because of that. I tried it again now and I got: "Bad Request (Invalid Hostname)" - strange.
Ok - now it's clear that the website is down, it asks for your username and password when you try to load it...
I wonder why people seem to have a bias against in-wall speakers, perhaps because most of them are poorly designed commercial ones that don't sound good? Unfortunately for me, the wall that I would want to mount speakers "in" is drywall over a brick wall w/o any space in between.
In the response graph you posted, the W5's sensitivity seems to match the tweeter, but, everywhere else I see measurements of the W5 put it anywhere from 85 - 88 db - the tweeter is over 90 db, right?
Was it not convenient for you to post a graph which also shows the individual driver's responses?
I was going to order 4 of the tweeters, but the PE website is down 🙁 I hope they didn't start blocking it on the firewall here at work because the URL has the word "sex" in it - I've seen it blocked some places because of that. I tried it again now and I got: "Bad Request (Invalid Hostname)" - strange.
Ok - now it's clear that the website is down, it asks for your username and password when you try to load it...