When I started this project....
Self - confidence is sometimes good thing... 😉 And what was object of NS's guys ? I belive, that your amp play good, but don't make idiots of them.... Most of people here like simply solutions, highest " meta " is some " two transistor miracle " and this way show here NP... BTW, your amp is only little modification of his ones... 😉
Self - confidence is sometimes good thing... 😉 And what was object of NS's guys ? I belive, that your amp play good, but don't make idiots of them.... Most of people here like simply solutions, highest " meta " is some " two transistor miracle " and this way show here NP... BTW, your amp is only little modification of his ones... 😉
Re: When I started this project....
Almost everyone has class AB or B amp...not Feedforward...
The difference is substantial...
Only a little?Upupa Epops said:BTW, your amp is only little modification of his ones... 😉
Almost everyone has class AB or B amp...not Feedforward...
The difference is substantial...
Feedforward ? Are you saying, that driving of load by driver is feedforward ? It's nothing new, I saw it at the first time in RCA's application manual from the year 67'...
No, the conception is older -
Harold Black (US Pat. 1686792. 9th Oct. 1929)
Let us know about your project?
Harold Black (US Pat. 1686792. 9th Oct. 1929)
Let us know about your project?
ANY?
Can you please explain what do you call a 'GC'?
Just to be more clear.
It seems you are making assumptions about things you haven't tried, haven't built, haven't heard.
Thank you.
Merry Christmas.
widowmaker said:When I started this project the basic requirement was:
Low cost, simple amp with good characteristics, better than ANY GC...
Can you please explain what do you call a 'GC'?
Just to be more clear.
It seems you are making assumptions about things you haven't tried, haven't built, haven't heard.
Thank you.
Merry Christmas.
Upupa Epops said:My project ? I don't like simply solutions.... 😉
Is this (in pdf) a simple solution or...?
Attachments
Upupa Epops said:This is better, than first one...try it in fullsymetry... 😉
Not necessary better amp with symmetrical design.
Many, including me, would say they prefer non-symmetrical amps.
I dont think this is the factor making an amp perform well.
There are good designs using both methods.
Even using single ended supply can make very good amplifiers!
Yes, it's not only the way, how to make good amp ... but most easy... nice distortion of single ended amp... here I am at the end with arguments...
We talk about sound, not about distortions 😀
The SE tube class A has more H. D. than SE solid state, but sounds better...
The SE tube class A has more H. D. than SE solid state, but sounds better...
Neverending story about nice distortion....Impressions by listening... Césane, Monet, Degas in electronic form....nothing for me...😎
Hi widowmaker you know my friend jean once told me that
a highend amp should be wideband, is yours such an amp
take a look at the stereophile amp of the year Dartzeel has
wide frequency response, that means my friend jean is
right
regards
a highend amp should be wideband, is yours such an amp
take a look at the stereophile amp of the year Dartzeel has
wide frequency response, that means my friend jean is
right
regards
mastertech said:.... a highend amp should be wideband ....
regards
Radio Frequency transmitter amplifiers should be wideband.
They should be able to more than very low frequency band of audio.
If you can not make a good audio amplifier
dont go into wideband amps ....
😉
they are not rf transmitters with good design practice they just have wide frequency response
regards
regards
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Death of Gain Clone