DAC AD1862: Almost THT, I2S input, NOS, R-2R

@diyiggy I know its hard to understand without listening. It's hard to explain as well 🙂 I do not like too much highs and many times solid state gear sounds too harsh to me.

I started writing my sound impression by memory and decided to listen again. I have to say it sounds significantly better after 24 hours breaking in, actually unbelievably better 🙂 The difference with PWD is not as striking anymore and I actually might prefer this DAC now. I have to withold my opinion for couple more days to allow for more break-in.

Definitely want to try other IV options. I expect that my diy dac journey is going to end up costing significantly more than getting an off-the-shelf dac. It's a cost of the journey and a big part of fun for me 🙂 and I think for most of us here.
Maybe it was just the initial shock ... maybe DAC is warming up or maybe brain is adjusting for "new" patterns in music that were previously damaged by a digital filter in WM874x delta sigma used in that DAC :rofl:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seavan
Maybe it was just the initial shock ... maybe DAC is warming up or maybe brain is adjusting for "new" patterns in music that were previously damaged by a digital filter in WM874x delta sigma used in that DAC :rofl:
Sometimes you have to get off the two tubes you putted into the ears cause no more free area on the workshop desk , before the next listening test session! 🤣

It is easy to solve some tones problems with the knobs of the pre or passive parts around the op amps 🙂
 
more definition, cleaner deeper bass, more extended highs, cleaner and wider soundstage, etc.


After playing for a month with only small bits - different regulators, i/v stages, separate transformers for everything, etc, I still find the high end extension and the soundstage precision lacking. NOS not the main culprit as there is surprisingly little difference between red book and 176kHz.

Passive parts clearly help with the highs, at least to some extent, but i don't believe the soundstage can easily be fixed.

It is perhaps the basic 1862 character. A few decades ago i had a commercial dac with this chip and it was dull as hell. This is so much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seavan
CS8416 or 14 ? doesn't remember exactly the ref. Not a great souvenir ! You need a good suply and avoiding RCA plug helped; but I do not regret any spidf reciever either... USB was a big step ! I

also tried the Wolfson in the Subbu DAC iirc too... short and pro plugs with impedance matching helped a lot.

DIR9001 in dac with ad1865 20 y ago perhaps, always the isolation is a cork for the sound (I risked direct coupling... way better) ! Maybe it was 16 y ago, do not remember. it was just before the Squeezeboxs... I had pillls of second hand cd player I bougth for nothing 5 to 20 euros...
 
Last edited:
CPLD for very low jitter with I2S inputs selector and selectable PCM output with Stop-Clock and ReClock function in progress 😎
Schematic based approach for CPLD. It will take some time to complete and test.
The schematic quartus project with modified pins will also be possible to upload into that standard 10€ CPLD board from aliexpress, there are inputs for oscillators 🙂
 

Attachments

  • Snímka obrazovky 2024-08-06 024437.png
    Snímka obrazovky 2024-08-06 024437.png
    20.6 KB · Views: 239
  • diyAudio_I2S-PCM-CPLD-ReClock_PCB.png
    diyAudio_I2S-PCM-CPLD-ReClock_PCB.png
    128.1 KB · Views: 229
  • diyAudio_I2S-PCM-CPLD-ReClock_Schematic.jpg
    diyAudio_I2S-PCM-CPLD-ReClock_Schematic.jpg
    572 KB · Views: 225
CPLD for very low jitter with I2S inputs selector and selectable PCM output with Stop-Clock and ReClock function in progress 😎
Schematic based approach for CPLD. It will take some time to complete and test.
The schematic quartus project with modified pins will also be possible to upload into that standard 10€ CPLD board from aliexpress, there are inputs for oscillators 🙂
What is this? What is its function?
Snimka obrazovky
 
Last edited: