inrank said:if i had two 16ohm WR125ST's i would need a tweeter so i would be veering away from my fullrange idea.
That's what I will be doing in the next little while. Two of the WR's run straight up and this tweeter. Nice integration, first order XO fairly high (read super easy XO). Approx 26 litre sealed enclosure. MTM.
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshowdetl.cfm?&DID=7&Partnumber=264-804
The truncated frame seems to match too. They seem to go together.
I may or may not need BSC, these little guys make better woofers than mids. I sometimes wonder about the W in WR. Does it really mean wide range? 😉
EDIT: I see on the PE website the tweeter is slightly different. I have the 25-302SE which seems to have a heatsink on the magnet but the one ion their site does not. Not sure if that's the only difference.
Attachments
Good for you Cal:
I see you finally took some of the good advice that has been offer to you.
I like the look of those drivers and a simple cross over to boot. You have come a long way my friend.
I can help you make a nice cabinet if you want. All you have to do is come over to the island with a soda keg and spend the weekend? We should be able to whip something up real nice and pretty like.
Nuff said for now
I see you finally took some of the good advice that has been offer to you.
I like the look of those drivers and a simple cross over to boot. You have come a long way my friend.
I can help you make a nice cabinet if you want. All you have to do is come over to the island with a soda keg and spend the weekend? We should be able to whip something up real nice and pretty like.
Nuff said for now
Sounds great Scott, especially the soda part. If you look here:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=76281&perpage=10&pagenumber=1
You'll see I am planning a slightly different shape this time. In fact I see the sun is trying to poke out so maybe I'll go get the wood now while it's dry.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=76281&perpage=10&pagenumber=1
You'll see I am planning a slightly different shape this time. In fact I see the sun is trying to poke out so maybe I'll go get the wood now while it's dry.
Hi,
go with the "real life" data from the magazines. I know both editors in person and you can trust them! I took the average of both measurements.
Qtc 0.707 is the "ideal" Q for a closed baffle, easy spoken (the Physics behind are more complicated of course)
Regards
Thorsten
go with the "real life" data from the magazines. I know both editors in person and you can trust them! I took the average of both measurements.
Qtc 0.707 is the "ideal" Q for a closed baffle, easy spoken (the Physics behind are more complicated of course)
Regards
Thorsten
ok thanks...
ill go with...
Fs: 46 Hz
Vas: 7 L
Qms: 3.8
Qes: 0.715
Qts: 0.60
and in a 11.5L enclosure +-3dB is 55Hz and +-6dB is 43Hz
sounds great to me.
ill go with...
Fs: 46 Hz
Vas: 7 L
Qms: 3.8
Qes: 0.715
Qts: 0.60
and in a 11.5L enclosure +-3dB is 55Hz and +-6dB is 43Hz
sounds great to me.
ok, this is my design for a Sealed enclosure.
freq. response taken from http://www.mhsoft.nl/spk_calc.asp using the provided parameters.....
does anyone know what the efficiency will roughly be?
what do you think?
freq. response taken from http://www.mhsoft.nl/spk_calc.asp using the provided parameters.....
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
does anyone know what the efficiency will roughly be?
what do you think?
Hey inrank, that looks like a nice speaker!
The efficency is the week point, something between 80 - 85 db depending on the BSC, but that's a fair trade off for getting so much bass out off such a tiny fullrange driver. Anyways, with your 50 W NAD and the sub, it will go loud.
The efficency is the week point, something between 80 - 85 db depending on the BSC, but that's a fair trade off for getting so much bass out off such a tiny fullrange driver. Anyways, with your 50 W NAD and the sub, it will go loud.
thinking of mabye making it in this style...
http://www.vikash.info/audio/W3-871S/
i love the look of the plywood when its finished, i have acess to bansaws etc so i should be able to make the parts well.
http://www.vikash.info/audio/W3-871S/
i love the look of the plywood when its finished, i have acess to bansaws etc so i should be able to make the parts well.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
worked out that the total build will be £140 inc delivery for everything except for the wood.
The majority is from Wilmslow Audio ( stuffing, binding posts cable and connectors) and the drivers and fixings from Mad About Sound.
will either start next week in my easter holidays or wait until the summer (two months )
The majority is from Wilmslow Audio ( stuffing, binding posts cable and connectors) and the drivers and fixings from Mad About Sound.
will either start next week in my easter holidays or wait until the summer (two months )
not to forget!
you forgot 2x 1.5 mH aircore inductors and 2 mox resistors (better get 6, 2x3.9, 2x5.6 and 2x 8.2 ohm to try out) for the BSC network.
You may also ask vikash about the BSC and what he thinks about a notch filter for the peak at 8kHz, we once discussed that in another thread and I believe the filter very usefull, I'm using 0.05mH, 15ohm and 10üF for the notch.
best, LC
you forgot 2x 1.5 mH aircore inductors and 2 mox resistors (better get 6, 2x3.9, 2x5.6 and 2x 8.2 ohm to try out) for the BSC network.
You may also ask vikash about the BSC and what he thinks about a notch filter for the peak at 8kHz, we once discussed that in another thread and I believe the filter very usefull, I'm using 0.05mH, 15ohm and 10üF for the notch.
best, LC
Two WR125STs
I guess if you can't stretch the budget for four WR125STs I'll still be your friend 😀 . But, I don't see a reason for you to NEED a tweeter because you're using two drivers.
I guess if you can't stretch the budget for four WR125STs I'll still be your friend 😀 . But, I don't see a reason for you to NEED a tweeter because you're using two drivers.
hi, can you help with the BSC, because if i do it i do not think i will notice the difference when listening in comparison.
thanks
do i even need one?
thanks
do i even need one?
Landroval said:How many are actually using BSC with FR125? Is it necessary?
Me & Yes it is necessary if you prefer a flat frequency response, like with almost every speaker, unless you have them wall or corner loaded.
inrank, you will notice the difference, your speaker will sound kind of thin without the BSC - i.e. Johnny Cash will sound like a dwarf. It's really a simple network, just put the inductor and the resistor in paralell and that package in series with the driver.
John "Zaph" Krutke gives some simple rules on adjusting the BSC to your needs, there you'll find a schematic too.
best, LC
lovechild said:Well I would not recommend an Onken, it's harder to build and you can not adjust the tunning frequency (fb) of the vents once you have build it.
True, but they sound better than any of the BR versions i've heard.... the little spiral port version is maybe even better.
dave
inrank said:which is most reliable?
None of them. Factory is probably the most reliable average.
I've measured more than 30 of them, the variation is quite wide.... and Fs was more like 75 Hz average.
Also keep in mind that there is no standard for drive when measuring the T/S parameters -- i can measure the same driver as someone else and get completely different results -- the way the results change doesn't much affect their tuning in a sealed box, and the Q is really too high for a good BR box, hence my strong preference for near aperiodic thru sealed (i'm ignorning OBs here which are sonically one of the big winners, but if you have a large room can easily exceed the drivers ability to more air and have some WAF issues).
dave
yeah, i am in a relatively small room, 8ft by 13ft and i think sealed will be best as to intergrate into my sub.
planet10 said:
True, but they sound better than any of the BR versions i've heard.... the little spiral port version is maybe even better.
dave
maybe because they have a BSC... 😉
Dave, what is a spiral port version?
LC
Re: not to forget!
Be careful about BSC... in a small room these don't need much and, like me, you may find they take away more than the give....
Attached is an in-room measure of a miniO with damping (about 3/4" of foam) added to the ports. (no filters, no BSC)
dave
belovechild said:about the BSC
Be careful about BSC... in a small room these don't need much and, like me, you may find they take away more than the give....
Attached is an in-room measure of a miniO with damping (about 3/4" of foam) added to the ports. (no filters, no BSC)
dave
Attachments
Re: Re: not to forget!
okay, you may or may not want or need it, but if you want to now, you will have to know/hear the difference, that means to try it out.
best, LC
planet10 said:be
Be careful about BSC... in a small room these don't need much and, like me, you may find they take away more than the give....
Attached is an in-room measure of a miniO with damping (about 3/4" of foam) added to the ports. (no filters, no BSC)
dave
okay, you may or may not want or need it, but if you want to now, you will have to know/hear the difference, that means to try it out.
best, LC
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- CSS FR125S Cabinet