Comparing LME49810, 49830 and 49811

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
811 is the mono version of 4702 with slight layout changes. 830 is specifically designed to drive mosfet output stages. 810 is beefed up version of 811 but having a classAB driver stage (811 has class A stage) to deliver extra current and has some extra features like baker clamp . You can consider that 810 is designed for hall and concert audio reproduction systems and 811 for hifi systems. You can find comments of Audioman54, a former National employee, in forum regarding these chips.

I did aural comparison with all the above chips and all of them sound different and I have read many of the audioman54 mark`s threads and replies. Agreed but my question is that if LM4702 can drive mosfets then can 811? can drive? or TI ripped off the higher Vbias feature in 811?
 

Attachments

  • Amplif..jpg
    Amplif..jpg
    323.4 KB · Views: 777
  • Extrem Edition3.jpg
    Extrem Edition3.jpg
    294 KB · Views: 748
  • P5120532.jpg
    P5120532.jpg
    993.5 KB · Views: 692
  • DSC00279.jpg
    DSC00279.jpg
    272.1 KB · Views: 666
Last edited:
I'm not really a fan of mosfet transistor type.
Class A is not for me. I become a little bit "green".

In one of his articles, Nelson Pass discusses the paranoia of some purchasers of his amplifiers ... one supposedly could hear when it transitioned from Class A to Class AB.

Here are some LME49830 modules from China using the Toshiba MOSFETs:
 

Attachments

  • LME49830A.jpg
    LME49830A.jpg
    59.6 KB · Views: 648
  • LME49830B.jpg
    LME49830B.jpg
    49.6 KB · Views: 283
Hi Mircea,

The board is very compact and and the components are neatly arrange. I have another question for you:
From the images available I did not see the component Rth NTC (thermistor) on the populated board (in the schematic is connected in parallel to potentioneter P1)
Is it an optional component?
Or it is foreseen for the thermal stablization of the output BJT bias current in case of use of BJTs without integrated diode for thermal track?

Best Regards,
Luigi
 
Hi Mircea,

Or it is foreseen for the thermal stablization of the output BJT bias current in case of use of BJTs without integrated diode for thermal track?

Best Regards,
Luigi


Hi Luigi,

Yes, it is for thermal stablization.
Unfortunately the diode inside ThermalTrak transistor is nothing else then ultrafast diode (MUR120).
However, in this configuration I have a very good thermal equilibrium.

Regards,

Mircea
 
Just another amplifier LME 49810 driving 4 pairs OT :D
Regards,Alex
 

Attachments

  • DSCN1378-001.jpg
    DSCN1378-001.jpg
    696.6 KB · Views: 617
  • DSCN1379-001.jpg
    DSCN1379-001.jpg
    911.4 KB · Views: 581
  • DSCN1380-001.jpg
    DSCN1380-001.jpg
    729.2 KB · Views: 544
  • DSCN1381-001.jpg
    DSCN1381-001.jpg
    498.3 KB · Views: 292
  • DSCN1382-001.jpg
    DSCN1382-001.jpg
    478.1 KB · Views: 294
  • DSCN1384-001.jpg
    DSCN1384-001.jpg
    920.6 KB · Views: 153
  • DSCN1385-001.jpg
    DSCN1385-001.jpg
    939.8 KB · Views: 153
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.