it a test if you can discern A and B under the conditions of fast switching, nothing else.
Certainly not the conditions you have when you listen to music.
So true.
While it is easy to figure out any unwanted change plugging a preamp in/out in a chain, i don't see what we can conclude "objectively", when it is about Power amps or Loudspeakers.
We will hear differences, but where is the reference ?
Now, everybody can differ in its judgments/preferences, depending of a lot of parameters: room acoustic, enclosures, type of music, knowledge of real instrument's sounds, knowledge of the recorded source contents, knowledge of the audio evils (distortions, bandwitchs, transients response etc) making us more or less able to distinguish them.
Not to talk of what is revealed only in the long run with various sources, like listening fatigue, slight imbalances of the response curve etc...
Every audio designer, each sound engineer use in its work process instant tests to figure out ...
what he prefer ;-)
Everybody is free to prefer something else than his neighbor, but a minimal intelligence is to respect its neighbor's preferences and let-it free to express them.
I don't understand why a handle of naysayers, always the same since the beginning, free to express their own preferences anywhere else, are trying endlessly
with a lot of noise to prevent us from moving on this CFA subject.
With high value contributions like:
...So-called "CFAs" are rubbish for audio.
They don't like CFAs ? Perfect: They can open their VFA thread and leave-us in peace, I believe no one of the people interested in this thread will come in their VFA one to annoy them as they do here.
Are CFA fans more educated, open minded and intelligent ?