CFA Topology Audio Amplifiers

Jump to Latest
#6,002
jan.didden said:
I've experimenting with a sort of 3D-power amp module, with the aim to a) put everything in the output stage on the heatsink, and b) make all connections including to the power supply very short but still away from sensitive circuit parts.

One implementation shown in the pictures - you can see that the (pre) drivers are on the inside of the aluminum bars. The power supply connections are short and orthogonal to the board.

As Bob noted, putting (pre)drivers on the main heat sinks can be too much for thermal stability, so I now would do it different, placing the (pre)drivers on the PCB with their own small heatsink.

However such a module approach is very good electrically, with very little crosstalk and almost no supply induced distortion. Also for servicing you can just replace a complete module very easily and quickly.

Jan
Click to expand...

Wow this looks great.

Where are you getting all the aluminum from? Do you by stock bars and mill them yourself?
 
#6,004
MiiB said:
Dadod, Damir. What was your impression for the thermal compensation on your TMC amplifier, did it thermally fit with the 4 tracking diodes you were using.
Click to expand...

I used the bias spreader suggested by B. Cordell in his book. It uses two TT diode in the bias spreader transistor emitter and has possibility to adjust the thermal compensation. With this bias spreader it's possible to use only one output TT transistor pair. You can find that in mine TT amp schematic.
 
#6,006
CFA because ---

dadod said:
I used the bias spreader suggested by B. Cordell in his book. It uses two TT diode in the bias spreader transistor emitter and has possibility to adjust the thermal compensation. With this bias spreader it's possible to use only one output TT transistor pair. You can find that in mine TT amp schematic.
Click to expand...

See if you can find your copy of Electronics & Wireless World July 1987. An article by E.MARGAN is "Crossover distortion in Class B amplifiers.

View attachment WW Class B.pdf


"..... when the class B output generates distortion the voltage gain stage is having a hard job to rebalance the error sensed by feedback, but it can only react with its own open-loop bandwidth and gain. ....... the distortion generated with class NSB operation is very close to the noise floor. These figures are the same as can be achieved with class A."

* NSB = No Switching B



THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
#6,007
Ideas always has an origin... had not expected this from 1987. Why did it not succeed..??
I do something along the same path. A non switching Class A-B OPS.
 

Attachments

  • OPS currents.JPG
    OPS currents.JPG
    65.6 KB · Views: 307
#6,010
This is the distortion (20 KHz/80V/p-p on my Non switching error correction OPS running open loop with a gain of 1.

A non global feedback amplifier is in the making.

Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized
Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg]
1 2.000e+04 4.023e+01 1.000e+00 -0.46° 0.00°
2 4.000e+04 1.033e-03 2.568e-05 12.41° 12.87°
3 6.000e+04 5.992e-04 1.489e-05 -85.51° -85.05°
4 8.000e+04 9.264e-06 2.303e-07 -94.70° -94.24°
5 1.000e+05 2.299e-04 5.714e-06 89.82° 90.27°
6 1.200e+05 3.884e-05 9.654e-07 15.11° 15.57°
7 1.400e+05 7.236e-05 1.799e-06 102.73° 103.19°
8 1.600e+05 1.987e-06 4.938e-08 -3.26° -2.81°
9 1.800e+05 4.298e-05 1.068e-06 110.33° 110.79°
Total Harmonic Distortion: 0.003032%
 
#6,013
PHEONIX said:
Hello Dadod,

I like your amplifier build, but I would like to say that it is good to use fusible or non flammable resistors on the output stage as it prevents board damage with an output stage failure . They look like carbon on the bases on the output devices I would use fusible types , I m not sure what RE (0.22R ) types you are using but I would use metal oxide types there if you are not already.
Click to expand...

hello,
there can be a couple of problems with fusible resistors.
1-they can be nonlinear near the fuse point.
2-Because each transistor is now fused when one blows it severely throws off the balance of the remaining transistors
 
#6,014
Waly said:
A short side comment, I've noticed that most implementations here are placing the output inductor on the PCB. This is, in my opinion, a very bad idea. The magnetic field couplings (in particular at high output powers) are guaranteed to add a useless spread of even order harmonics. I would place the output inductor, and the parallel damping resistor, as close as possible to the speaker connectors, and as far as possible form any signal cables.

Good night.
Click to expand...

Hello,
it is important to remember that the inductors need to be oriented at 90° to each other, ideally aligned to the center of the device to minimize crosstalk.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom