Uhhhh, no. You might reread the posts. ZeroD's started this line of discussion. Start with the wrong assumption and everything that follows is nonsense.
right.. all BayBee would have to show is that they suffered financial damage due to slander. that's why I suggested the inevitable cross suit when then they find out from the biz records there isnt much billing time for either side.
Last edited:
You obviously have no idea what works. Two types of electrons, I almost pissed my pants laughing. Do you know anything about physic?
There are elastic and inelastic electron collisions. Apparently the 'state' of the individual electrons makes them different from each other.
I was at a deposition once where one guy had the first page of the other guy's patent taped inside the front cover of his lab notebook.
Last edited:
Nonsense. Complete and utter nonsense.
Doesn't this stuff embarrass you even a little bit?
When SY measured a small Bybee which is a carbon nanotube resistor he could find no difference between that and any other resistor.
Now I believe the only proper day to discuss Bybees is on April 1st. So if reminded a bit ahead I will post some measurements then. No I won't discuss until then what is measured or the results.
Meantime those who have never even seen one are welcome to post their opinions. Maybe even those who have played with them also...
Now on to more important issues like anti-gravity and how it improves the high frequency response of left-hand wound dome tweeters.
Now I believe the only proper day to discuss Bybees is on April 1st. So if reminded a bit ahead I will post some measurements then. No I won't discuss until then what is measured or the results.
Meantime those who have never even seen one are welcome to post their opinions. Maybe even those who have played with them also...
Now on to more important issues like anti-gravity and how it improves the high frequency response of left-hand wound dome tweeters.
No. All electrons behave randomly. It's their very nature. It has nothing to do with how they interact with other particles. But the randomness is only visible at the microscopic level. At the macroscopic level the randomness becomes insignificant.
I think you're confusing quantum noise with thermal noise:
http://ecee.colorado.edu/~ecen5014/Oliver-noise-1965.pdf
Secret sources I can't disclose.... (I bought each type and took one apart. BTY you mentioned you were playing with a small one as I recall. If not the biggie is a metal film resistor coated with a powder I have yet to bother getting analyzed. But one cousin at least used to have an FFT mass spectrometer.)
Right, the demons are kept busy at night unwinding them and weaving 1000's in parallel. 🙄
Last edited:
Why are we talking about...
wave -particle theory. Wave-particle theory is obviously in its infancy (yes, I'm calling it infantile). And isn't the current theory that an electron is a cloud/shell, not a particle?
If we start talking about wine, I'm call the cops.
wave -particle theory. Wave-particle theory is obviously in its infancy (yes, I'm calling it infantile). And isn't the current theory that an electron is a cloud/shell, not a particle?
If we start talking about wine, I'm call the cops.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.