I'm awaiting the next batch to be ready. Will you be updating on here when they are, or is it a matter of checking the website often?
Raj1 said:I'm awaiting the next batch to be ready. Will you be updating on here when they are, or is it a matter of checking the website often?
Both. 😉
mikelm said:just to clarify - these mods are on the IVY and not on the Buffalo ?
That is correct. 🙂
Re: Seeking help in auditioning a part change for buffalo IVY setup
Pls explain Russ. I'll gladly do the mod, but what's the hassle ?
Russ White said:
... the worry of any potential slewing of the IVY when used with the Buffalo.
.
.
.
Cheers!
Russ
Pls explain Russ. I'll gladly do the mod, but what's the hassle ?
Well put simply, the mod would eliminate the possibility of a fast transient (like a square wave) of causing slewing type distortion. Current output DACs like the Buffalo can slew quite a lot faster than the opamp. this compensates for that.
In short the mod should make the DAC sound a bit better on fast transients. 🙂
Cheers!
Russ
In short the mod should make the DAC sound a bit better on fast transients. 🙂
Cheers!
Russ
IVY Mod
So, if I'm reading the schematic right, we add 4 capacitors in shunt-to-ground position on the inputs, and in exchange we get to remove 4 resistors that are dead in the signal path for the single ended portion of the circuit? Let me check the parts bin! Of course, I could be reading it wrong....
So, if I'm reading the schematic right, we add 4 capacitors in shunt-to-ground position on the inputs, and in exchange we get to remove 4 resistors that are dead in the signal path for the single ended portion of the circuit? Let me check the parts bin! Of course, I could be reading it wrong....
The resistors (R17-R20) add a series resistance to the filter caps in the feedback loop.
They are not needed in the modified config, but should not hurt either.
Yes the caps you will be add are at the inputs to GND. (C13-C16).
See our site for the current schematic and layout.
Cheers!
Russ
They are not needed in the modified config, but should not hurt either.
Yes the caps you will be add are at the inputs to GND. (C13-C16).
See our site for the current schematic and layout.
Cheers!
Russ
avr300 said:Ready to test
Excellent, I can't wait to hear back from you folks! 🙂
Thanks!
Another Buffalo up and running! This one with Pass D1 as I/V.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1638696#post1638696
Thanks alot Russ and Brian!
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1638696#post1638696
Thanks alot Russ and Brian!
Re: Re: Torroids for Buffalo and IVY
what voltage / current will the placid be able to supply?
BrianDonegan said:
We carry the 15V trafos because they would work pretty well for all of our stuff, so one size fits all. I will, however, start carrying 9V trafos as of next week. This is primarily to support our new Placid shunt regulated power supply, but will also work well for Buffalo VD.
what voltage / current will the placid be able to supply?
Hartono said:my soldering iron is still hot....
added cap and jumper the resistor, 2 polystrene caps 4.7nf in parallel = 9.4nf
first impression........much better ^^
will listen further and see if this configuration is preferable
Excellent! I will wait for further word.
Re: Re: Re: Torroids for Buffalo and IVY
From 3V to 15V and 200ma max current.
Cheers!
Russ
luvdunhill said:
what voltage / current will the placid be able to supply?
From 3V to 15V and 200ma max current.
Cheers!
Russ
Yunick said:Another Buffalo up and running! This one with Pass D1 as I/V.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1638696#post1638696
Thanks alot Russ and Brian!
Great!
I actually used a circuit very much like the D1, I called the Haiku.
I am sure it will sound great!
Cheers!
Russ
too bad you couldn't shift things down and leave some room for single diodes instead of the bridges... looks like a neat design.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- More Vendors...
- Twisted Pear
- Buffalo DAC (ESS Sabre 9008)