Bipolar discrete shunt regulators

Status
Not open for further replies.
jameshillj said:
...And it's never good practice to "bend sharp" the component leads.

I entirely agree. I use a pair of needle pliers (with the sharp edge ground to create a bend radius) to grip the lead near the body, then make the bend = no stress. It's so ugly bending from the body. Thus 0.4" on a 1/4W is about minimum.

Brian.
 
- 2250x1550mils
 

Attachments

  • toole_v34_brd.png
    toole_v34_brd.png
    38.3 KB · Views: 827
I need to apologize to all the people who contributed to this effort who may have been missed in the 'Thank You' line I put in the last image. I'm going to take the line out just to be fair to everyone, but I think we all need to recognize the efforts by Apassgear, Steenoe and Manu all especially to get us to where we are today.

Thanks guys and sorry for missing your names. I'm sure everyone appreciates all your efforts and I think it deserves to be mentioned again.

Latest changes:

- moved D1 and D3 to the left to shorten those traces
- made a single layer version for etching/testing but requires 1 jumper at R5 and not shown on the layout but the holes are there

I'm attaching the pdfs for etching if someone wants to build/test this in single layer form - copper is not mirrored, silk layer is mirrored
 

Attachments

janneman said:
It's almost looking like a board I would have designed 😀

Jan Didden


BDP said:
The board looks real good. :cheerful: I like that R5 and R6 were moved away from the power transistors. Thanks for all the effort that you have put into this layout.

BDP

😀 thanks for the kind words and thanks for your helpful emails BDP.

moving the resistors was Jan's idea :cheers:

@ikoflexer - sorry I didn't get to reply to your earlier post - today was freezing ... this weather is driving me crazy :frosty: :cuss:
 
Layout - R1

Hello Twitchie,

I was playing with the layout and am confused by your schematic in post 302 versus the layout in post 322. Is there not a connection missing from the current source (collector of Q6) to the rest of the circuit, like R1, D2, etc.. Something looks not quite right? Or is this the wrong layout ? 😕
 
Status
Not open for further replies.