Big, strange WAW project

the Peerless is only 4.1dB more sensitive than the Pluvia

Typically you want 2-4 dB depending on the room. 6dB requires a really large room and the speaker no where near the walls.

I typically target 3dB.

And keep in mind every dB you raise the on-axis to compensate for baffle step you also increas (in excess) the room response so there is no “perfect".

dave
 
  • Like
Reactions: lewisb
Typically you want 2-4 dB depending on the room. 6dB requires a really large room and the speaker no where near the walls.
Indeed, so for DIYers, best overall IME is do the full 6 dB (or more IME with lossy rooms) if practical from a size/$$ POV and use DSP to frequency shape it in room or if have multiple switchable settings, then shape for various music genres and one for HT.
 
Hey @lewisb just having a look at it now. Made an frd file from the data provided by the sheets but the response is looking terrible 😂

This is going to take too much of my free time I'm afraid and I don't have that many.... maybe someone who's more into full range drivers can help out?
 
This is the best i can simulate the Pluvia with the data from markaudio. adding the woofer creates a load of phase issues.

looking at the frequency response.... this is terrible...

made the frd and zma files with SPL Trace inside Vituix.
 

Attachments

  • Pluvia.PNG
    Pluvia.PNG
    29.4 KB · Views: 68
  • frd pluvia_SPL.txt
    frd pluvia_SPL.txt
    18.3 KB · Views: 48
  • ohm pluvia_ZR.txt
    ohm pluvia_ZR.txt
    18.3 KB · Views: 47