Same test run on the Dell. Something going on at LF here.
That looks like it's from the power supply. Get a -160db log spectrum for more detail.
The difference between Opal and Ruby is much much more than that. And then some 😀
OK. I am not trying that hard. The signals are too unpleasant to listen to so there is not much incentive.
IMO, the 19 kHz is of no importance at all. It doesn't make it down the string between my two tin cans. Maybe if I stretch the string tighter?
Unfortunately, if you want a really good listening panel you have to exclude anybody above the age of about 40, because their hearing isn't what it used to be. If you want people with a lot of experience, electronic or musical, you have to exclude anybody below the age of 40. Though I hear plenty of differences, and have a preference, I trust my measurements far more than my hearing.
What the heck is that noise in the files? My worst LP transfers get cleaned up better than that. OTOH, these files seem to have more life or emotion than the earlier test, where I thought all the files were flat in some way.
Unfortunately, if you want a really good listening panel you have to exclude anybody above the age of about 40, because their hearing isn't what it used to be. If you want people with a lot of experience, electronic or musical, you have to exclude anybody below the age of 40. Though I hear plenty of differences, and have a preference, I trust my measurements far more than my hearing.
What the heck is that noise in the files? My worst LP transfers get cleaned up better than that. OTOH, these files seem to have more life or emotion than the earlier test, where I thought all the files were flat in some way.
Sure. This 19kHz line is of no importance at all. It is more than difficult to discuss with some here.
Well as you are all here 😀
If you give me 10 minutes all will be revealed. I want to include a picture of what you were listening to.
If you give me 10 minutes all will be revealed. I want to include a picture of what you were listening to.
Hehehe I believe heb1001 on this. I listened the file on very low volume but I could feel it. I wouldn't be able to stand a full volume 🙂 Fatigue due to peaks above 20kh is commonly perceived by people including me.
How that? You do not hear -65dB 1kHz single tone but you hear -78dB 19kHz totally burried in average music signal.
Firstly. thanks to fas42 for the honest comments on how it sounded (and when I listen I think I prefer Ruby too which shows just how much a part subjectivity plays in what we actually like).... however, are you all ready this.... 😀
Ruby was recorded on an original but mint and pristine Sony TCK5 Dolby B cassette deck (from around 1978). Its all discrete and electrically all original. 35 year old caps and all.
Opal was a Sony CPD 790, again unmodified.
Surprised ? or not ?
Ruby was recorded on an original but mint and pristine Sony TCK5 Dolby B cassette deck (from around 1978). Its all discrete and electrically all original. 35 year old caps and all.
Opal was a Sony CPD 790, again unmodified.
Surprised ? or not ?
Attachments
What the heck is that noise in the files? My worst LP transfers get cleaned up better than that. OTOH, these files seem to have more life or emotion than the earlier test, where I thought all the files were flat in some way.
You don't think there might be some intermodulation distortion from that 19kHz signal in the ADC?
How that? You do not hear -65dB 1kHz single tone but you hear -78dB 19kHz totally burried in average music signal.
How? Very simple. You just need to read my post. From where you can conclude that I don't hear -65dB 1kh tone burst?? Don't underestimate the intelligent people around here.
How? Very simple. You just need to read my post. From where you can conclude that I don't hear -65dB 1kh tone burst?? Don't underestimate the intelligent people around here.
You said you heard nothing from orange and kiwi samples I posted.
Firstly. thanks to fas42 for the honest comments on how it sounded (and when I listen I think I prefer Ruby too which shows just how much a part subjectivity plays in what we actually like).... however, are you all ready this.... 😀
Ruby was recorded on an original but mint and pristine Sony TCK5 Dolby B cassette deck (from around 1978). Its all discrete and electrically all original. 35 year old caps and all.
Opal was a Sony CPD 790, again unmodified.
Surprised ? or not ?
I spent my whole childhood listening to tape and it was much better than that. What went wrong?
I spent my whole childhood listening to tape and it was much better than that. What went wrong?
Nothing went wrong.
What this kind of test seems to show is that you all look first to software analysis, and then base your listening opinions on the result of that outcome.
That's how it seems to me.
Neither of your samples actually sound like a tape recorder at all. Not even remotely. They are so far off, there's no way I would have guessed.
Did you play a sound from your sound card, record it to tape then play it back and record it back with your sound card?
Did you play a sound from your sound card, record it to tape then play it back and record it back with your sound card?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- General Interest
- Everything Else
- Based on sonics... which do you prefer ?